The Library
Do elections always motivate incumbents? : learning vs. re-election concerns
Tools
Le Borgne, Eric and Lockwood, Ben (2004) Do elections always motivate incumbents? : learning vs. re-election concerns. Discussion Paper. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. (Discussion paper (Centre for Economic Policy Research).
|
PDF
WRAP_Lockwood_DP4664.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (285Kb) |
Abstract
This paper studies a principal-agent model of the relationship between office-holder and an electorate, where everyone is initially uninformed about the office-holder’s ability. If office-holder effort and ability interact in the determination of performance in office, then an office-holder has an incentive to learn, i.e., raise effort so that performance becomes a more accurate signal of her ability. Elections reduce the learning effect, and the reduction in this effect may more than offset the positive “re-election concerns” effect of elections on effort, implying higher effort with appointment. When this occurs, appointment of officials may welfare-dominate elections.
| Item Type: | Working or Discussion Paper (Discussion Paper) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Political behavior , Elections |
| Series Name: | Discussion paper (Centre for Economic Policy Research) |
| Publisher: | Centre for Economic Policy Research |
| Place of Publication: | London |
| Date: | October 2004 |
| Number: | No.4664 |
| Number of Pages: | 24 |
| Status: | Not Peer Reviewed |
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/269 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

