The Library
Direct observation and theory of trajectory-dependent electronic energy losses in medium-energy ion scattering
Tools
Hentz, A., Parkinson, G. S., Quinn, P. D., Muñoz-Márquez, M. A., Woodruff, D. P., Grande, P. L., Schiwietz, G., Bailey, P. and Noakes, T. C. Q.. (2009) Direct observation and theory of trajectory-dependent electronic energy losses in medium-energy ion scattering. Physical Review Letters, Vol.102 (No.9). p. 6103. ISSN 0031-9007
|
PDF
WRAP_Woodruff_6870049-px-030210-trajectory_dependent_energy_loss_revised.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (822Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.096103
Abstract
The energy spectrum associated with scattering of 100 keV H+ ions from the outermost few atomic layers of Cu(111) in different scattering geometries provides direct evidence of trajectory-dependent electronic energy loss. Theoretical simulations, combining standard Monte Carlo calculations of the elastic scattering trajectories with coupled-channel calculations to describe inner-shell ionization and excitation as a function of impact parameter, reproduce the effects well and provide a means for far more complete analysis of medium-energy ion scattering data.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Q Science > QC Physics |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science > Physics |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Ions -- Scattering -- Research, Surfaces (Physics) -- Research, Particle range (Nuclear physics), Ion bombardment |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Physical Review Letters |
| Publisher: | American Physical Society |
| ISSN: | 0031-9007 |
| Date: | 6 March 2009 |
| Volume: | Vol.102 |
| Number: | No.9 |
| Page Range: | p. 6103 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.096103 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
| References: | 1 J.F. van der Veen, Surf. Sci. Rep. 5, 199 (1985). 2 M. Copel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 152909 (2008). 3 A. Iwamoto et al. Nucl. Instrum Methods B 266, 965 (2008). 4 S.-J. Kahng et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4931 (1998). 5 J.F. Ziegler, SRIM code, http://www.SRIM.org 6 D.S. Gemmel, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 129 (1974). 7 S. Lederer and H. Winter, Phys. Rev. A 73, 054901 (2006). 8 G. Schiwietz, Phys. Rev. A42, 296 (1990); P.L. Grande and G. Schiwietz, Phys. Rev. A44, 2984 (1991); G. Schiwietz and P.L. Grande, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B69, 10 (1992); P.L.Grande and G. Schiwietz, Phys. Rev. A47, 1119 (1993). 9 A. Hentz et al., Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006) 125408. 10 J.W.M. Frenken, R.M. Tromp and J.F. van der Veen, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B17, 334 (1986) 11 P.F.A. Alkemade, W.C. Turkenburg, and W.F. van der Weg, Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B 28, 161 (1987). 12 P.L. Grande et al., Phys. Rev. B 69, 104112 (2004). 13 P.Bailey, T.C.Q. Noakes, and D.P. Woodruff, Surf. Sci. 426, 358 (1999). 14 R.M. Tromp et al. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 2679 (1991). 15 D. Brown et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 1889 (1999). 16 W. Fritsch and C.D. Lin Phys. Rep. 202, 1 (1991); J.F. Reading et al., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 30, L189 (1997). 17 J.Bang and J.M.Hansteen, Kgl. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd. 31, No.13 (1959); L. Wilets and S. J. Wallace, Phys. Rev. 169, 84 (1968); M.R. Flannery and K.J.MacCann, Phys. Rev. A8, 2915 (1973). 18 P.L. Grande et al., Nucl. Instrum and Meth. 256, 92 (2007). 19 R.P. Pezzi et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 164102 (2008). |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2695 |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

