Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The value added tax : its causes and consequences

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Keen, Michael and Lockwood, Ben (2007) The value added tax : its causes and consequences. Working Paper. [Coventry]: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. (Warwick economic research papers.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Lockwood_twerp_801.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (285Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

Almost unknown in 1960, the value added tax (VAT) is now found in more than 130 countries, raises around 20 percent of the world’s tax revenue, and has been the centerpiece of tax reform in many developing countries. This paper explores the causes and consequences of the remarkable rise of the VAT. A key question is whether it has indeed proved, as its proponents claim, an especially effective form of taxation. To address this, it is first shown that a tax innovation—such as the introduction of a VAT—reduces the marginal cost of public funds if and only if it also leads an optimizing government to increase the tax ratio. This observation leads to the estimation, on a panel of 143 countries for 25 years, of a system of equations describing both the probability of VAT adoption and the revenue impact of the VAT. The results point to a rich set of determinants of VAT adoption, this being more likely, for example, if a country has a program with the IMF and the less open it is to international trade. In the revenue equation, the presence of a VAT does indeed have a significant impact, but also a complex one, with a negative intercept effect counteracted by positive effects that are greater the higher are per capita income and, more tentatively, openness. While the sign of the revenue impact of the VAT is thus in general ambiguous, most countries that have adopted a VAT seem to have gained a more effective tax instrument in doing so (though this is less apparent in sub- Saharan Africa), and most without it seem likely to gain from its adoption.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Value-added tax, Taxation
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: [Coventry]
Date: May 2007
Number: No.801
Number of Pages: 35
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Agha, Ali, and Jonathan Haughton, 1996, “Designing VAT systems: Some efficiency considerations,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 303–08. Aizenman, Joshua, and Yothin Jinjarak, 2005, “The collection efficiency of the VAT: Theory and international evidence,” NBER Working Paper 11539. Alesina, Alberto, and Romain Wacziarg, 1998, “Openness, country size, and government,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 69, pp. 305–21. Atkinson, Anthony B. and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1976, “The design of tax structure: Direct versus indirect taxation,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 6, pp.305-21. Bahl, Roy, 1971, “A regression approach to tax effort and tax ratio analysis,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 18 (Washington: International Monetary Fund), pp.570–612. Baltagi, 2001, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (John Wiley & Sons: Chichester). Besley, Timothy, and Ian Jewitt, 1995, “Uniform taxation and consumer preferences,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 58, pp.73–84. Besley, Timothy and Michael Besley (2007), “Fiscal restraints and voter welfare,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 91, pp.755-733. Bovenberg, A. Lans, 1987, “Indirect taxation in developing countries: A general equilibrium approach,” Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 34, pp. 333–73. Desai, Mihir A., and James R. Hines Jr., 2005, “Value added taxes and international trade: The evidence” (mimeo, Michigan: University of Michigan). Ebrill, Liam, Michael Keen, Jean-Paul Bodin, and Victoria Summers, 2001, The Modern VAT, (Washington: International Monetary Fund). Edwards, Jeremy and Michael Keen, 1996, “Tax competition and leviathan”(with Jeremy Edwards), European Economic Review, Vol. 40, pp.113–34. Emran, Shahe M., and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2005, “On selective indirect tax reform in developing countries,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 89, pp.599–623. Hicks, John, 1939, Value and Capital (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Hsaio, C., 1986, The Analysis of Panel Data (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Jenkins, Glenn, Hatice Jenkins, and Chun-Yan Kuo, 2006, “Is the value added tax naturally progressive?” (mimeo, Canada: Queens University). Keen, Michael, 2006, “VAT, tariffs and withholding taxes” (mimeo, Washington: International Monetary Fund). _____, and Ben Lockwood, 2006, “Is the VAT a money machine?” National Tax Journal, Vol. LIX, pp.905-928. _____, and Stephen Smith, 2006, “What do we know about VAT evasion?” National Tax Journal, Vol. LIX, pp.905-928. Maddala, 1983, Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Matthews, Kent, 2003, “VAT evasion and VAT avoidance: Is there a European Laffer curve for VAT?” International Review of Applied Economics, Vol.17, pp.105–11. Matthews, Kent, and Jean Lloyd-Williams, 2000, “Have VAT rates reached their limit? An empirical note,” Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 7, pp.111–15. Muñoz, Sonia, and Stanley Sang-Wook Cho, 2004, “Social impact of a tax reform: The case of Ethiopia,” in Gupta, S., B. Clements and G. Inchauste (eds), Helping Countries Develop: The Role of Fiscal Policy (Washington: International Monetary Fund), pp.353–84. Nellor, David, 1987, “The effect of value-added tax on the tax ratio,” IMF Working Paper 87/47 (Washington: International Monetary Fund). Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini, 2003, The Economic Effects of Constitution (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press). Piggott, John, and John Whalley, 2001, “VAT base broadening, self supply, and the informal sector,” American Economic Review, Vol. 91, pp.1084–94. President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform, 2006, Simple, Fair & Pro-Growth: Proposals to Fix America’s Tax System. Ring, Raymond J. Jr., 1999, “The proportion of consumers’ and producers’ goods in the general sales tax,” National Tax Journal, Vol. 42, pp. 167–79. Rodrik, D., 1998, “Why do more open economies have bigger governments?” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 106, pp. 997–1032. Tanzi, Vito, 1992, “Structural factors and tax revenue in developing countries: A decade of evidence,” in Open Economies: Structural Adjustment and Agriculture, ed. by I. Goldin and A.L. Winters (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 205–41. Triesman, D., 2002, “Defining and measuring decentralization: A global perspective,” unpublished paper, UCLA. Wooldridge, J.M., 2002, Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press).
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/271

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us