Barnutz, Sebastian (2009) What do they mean by saying ESDP? Exploring the social construction of European security. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

PDF WRAP_THESIS_Barnutz_2009.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (987Kb)

Abstract

This thesis addresses the question of how actors of the EU’s security policy were able to say ESDP at the turn of the 21st century. Despite previous attempts to implement a security policy at the EU or EC level, ESDP was first launched in 1999 and became operational in 2003. The very interest of the thesis is how central EU actors – who were responsible for the institutional development and implementation of ESDP – understood security; that is: what they perceived as referent object, what they perceived as threats or as security problems, and how this made possible the implementation of a security policy at the EU level. By asking these questions the thesis does what discourse analysis is best in: discourse analysis enables the researcher to discover the underlying rationalities which led EU actors to presume a security policy as being necessary at the EU level.
This argument on discourse analysis is derived from Nicolas Onuf’s work, which most plausibly conceptualises the role of language in the construction of social reality. The thesis starts from a constructivist perspective arguing that actors’ behaviour is based on their identity and that they perceive the world from this intersubjective perspective. The rational of security is based on this intersubjective perspective and constructed by relating identity to the perception of threats or security problems. This relation of threats and referent objects lead to the construction of rules of appropriate behaviour in the case of security. These processes of social interaction take place through language and can best be studied from a discursive perspective.
The concept of security established at the EU level leading to the institutionalisation of ESDP is understood to be a result of this type of social interaction. Overtime, it led EU actors to a robust construction of the EU as an international actor in the field of security facing dynamic security problems by a cooperative and multilateral approach but also by using civilian and military capabilities.

Item Type:	Thesis or Dissertation (PhD)
Subjects:	J Political Science > JZ International relations J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	European Security and Defence Policy, Security, International -- European Union countries, State governments and international relations -- European Union countries, Discourse analysis -- Research
Official Date:	August 2009
Dates:	Date Event August 2009 Submitted
Institution:	University of Warwick
Theses Department:	Department of Politics and International Studies
Thesis Type:	PhD
Publication Status:	Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor:	Croft, Stuart
Sponsors:	Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)
Format of File:	pdf
Extent:	347 leaves
Language:	eng
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2739

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads