Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Apparent non-statistical binding in a ditopic receptor for guanosine

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Likhitsup, Asawin, Deeth, Robert J., Otto, Sijbren and Marsh, Andrew. (2009) Apparent non-statistical binding in a ditopic receptor for guanosine. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Vol.7 (No.10). pp. 2093-2103. ISSN 1477-0520

[img]
Preview
Text (Article text)
WRAP_Marsh_OBCb812969j_postprint.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1274Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Image (Graphical Abstract)
websiteabstract.jpg - Supplemental Material

Download (29Kb) | Preview
[img] Other (Curve fitting for dilution of monoalkyne receptor 1 (dimer))
WRAP_Marsh_cc_dilution_pvalues.xls - Supplemental Material

Download (99Kb)
[img] Other (Curve fitting for dilution of dialkyne receptor 2 (dimer))
WRAP_Marsh_cc_dilution_pvalue.xls - Supplemental Material

Download (109Kb)
[img] Other (Curve fitting for dilution of guanosine guest 3 (G dimer and G tetramer))
WRAP_Marsh_g_self-association_pvalues.xls - Supplemental Material

Download (82Kb)
[img] Other (Global curve fitting for 2:1 complex 3•1•3 assuming receptor dimer and guanosine tetramer)
WRAP_Marsh_monoalkynecc__2g_pvalues.xls - Supplemental Material

Download (146Kb)
[img] Other (Global curve fitting for 2:1 complex 3•2•3 assuming receptor dimer and guanosine tetramer)
WRAP_Marsh_cc__2g_pvalues.xls - Supplemental Material

Download (146Kb)
[img]
Preview
Text (ESI-Part1)
WRAP_Marsh_marsh_obcb812969j_si1decfinalrevision.pdf - Supplemental Material

Download (506Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (ESI-Part2)
WRAP_Marsh_marshgraphicsobcb812969j_reviseddec2008.pdf - Supplemental Material

Download (904Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b812969j

Abstract

Analysis of stepwise association constants for guests binding to more than one site in a receptor is expected to give a ratio of the first association constant to the second of about 4 : 1 on statistical grounds (since a second guest should have an equal chance of binding to a different site on the same, or a new molecule). Taking account of self-association in our analysis of a system in which the binding sites are close together, we observe a ratio closer to 1 : 1, indicative of non-statistical, or cooperative binding. The longer homologue built around two alkynes displays a very different ratio of stepwise association constants of about 7 : 1. We discuss the origins of this unusual behaviour in terms of steric interactions within the receptors and their corresponding complexes with guanosine derivatives.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QD Chemistry
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Chemistry
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Binding sites (Biochemistry)
Journal or Publication Title: Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry
ISSN: 1477-0520
Date: 2009
Volume: Vol.7
Number: No.10
Number of Pages: 11
Page Range: pp. 2093-2103
Identification Number: 10.1039/b812969j
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Description: Attached MS Excel spreadsheets that enable curve fitting of NMR titration data and calculation of probabilities of binding for molecules above. Monoalkyne is receptor 1, dialkyne is receptor 2, guanosine is guest 3. Also attached are PDF files of Supporting Information here including methods used for NMR and ITC titrations and analysis.
Funder: University of Warwick. Dept. of Chemistry
References: 1. J. D. Badjic, A. Nelson, S. J. Cantrill, W. B. Turnbull and J. F. Stoddart, Acc. Chem. Res., 2005, 38, 723-732. 2. G. Ercolani, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 5052-5057. 3. A. Marquis, J. P. Kintzinger, R. Graff, P. N. W. Baxter and J. M. Lehn, Angew. Chem. Intl. Edn., 2002, 41, 2760-2764. 4. W. P. Jencks, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1981, 78, 4046-4050. 5. M. I. Page and W. P. Jencks, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1971, 68, 1678-&. 6. G. Ercolani, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 16097-16103. 7. G. Ercolani, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 803-805. 8. A. D. Hughes and E. V. Anslyn, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2007, 104, 6538-6543. 9. G. Ercolani, C. Piguet, M. Borkovec and J. Hamacek, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111, 12195-12203. 10. J. L. Sessler, C. M. Lawrence and J. Jayawickramarajah, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 314-325. 11. A. Marsh, N. W. Alcock, W. Errington and R. Sagar, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 5595-5601. 12. S. Stoncius, E. Orentas, E. Butkus, L. Ohrstrom, O. F. Wendt and K. Wärnmark, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 8272-8285. 13. F. G. J. Odille, S. Jónsson, S. Stjernqvist, T. Rydén and K. Wärnmark, Chem. Eur. J., 2007, 13, 9617-9636. 14. K. A. Connors, Binding Constants. The Measurement of Molecular Complex Stability., Wiley, Chichester, 1987. 15. L. Fielding, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 6151-6170. 16. K. Hirose, J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem., 2001, 39, 193-209. 17. C. S. Wilcox, in Frontiers in Supramolecular Organic Chemistry and Photochemistry, eds. H.-J. Schneider, H. Durr and J.-M. Lehn, VCH, Editon edn., 1991. 18. H.-J. Schneider and A. K. Yatsimirsky, Principles and Methods in Supramolecular Chemistry, 1st edn., Wiley, 2000. 19. M. Saunders and J. B. Hyne, J. Chem. Phys., 1958, 29, 1319-1323. 20. S. C. Zimmerman and B. F. Duerr, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 2215-2217. 21. SpecFit, http://www.bio-logic.info/rapid-kinetics/software.html, Accessed 7 November, 2008. 22. C. Frassineti, S. Ghelli, P. Gans, A. Sabatini, M. S. Moruzzi and A. Vacca, Anal Biochem, 1995, 231, 374-382. 23. P. Kuzmic, Anal. Biochem., 1996, 237, 260-273. 24. Prism, http://www.graphpad.com/prism/prism.htm, Accessed 7 November, 2008. 25. M. J. Hynes, J Chem Soc Dalton, 1993, 311-312. 26. C. Frassineti, L. Alderighi, P. Gans, A. Sabatini, A. Vacca and S. Ghelli, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2003, 376, 1041-1052. 27. A. P. Bisson, C. A. Hunter, J. C. Morales and K. Young, Chem. Eur. J., 1998, 4, 845-851. 28. M. D. Cowart, I. Sucholeiki, R. R. Bukownik and C. S. Wilcox, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 6204-6210. 29. V. G. H. Lafitte, A. E. Aliev, P. N. Horton, M. B. Hursthouse and H. C. Hailes, Chem. Commun., 2006, 2173-2175. 30. J. P. Clare, A. J. Ayling, J. B. Joos, A. L. Sisson, G. Magro, M. N. Perez-Payan, T. N. Lambert, R. Shukla, B. D. Smith and A. P. Davis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 10739-10746. 31. H. Dodziuk, K. S. Nowinski, W. Kozminski and G. Dolgonos, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1, 581-584. 32. G. Pistolis and A. Malliaris, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1999, 310, 501-507. 33. G. Pistolis and A. Malliaris, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1999, 303, 334-340. 34. L. D. Williams, N. G. Williams and B. R. Shaw, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 829-833. 35. J. Sartorius and H. J. Schneider, Chem. Eur. J., 1996, 2, 1446-1452. 36. D. C. Harris, J. Chem. Educ., 1998, 75, 119-121. 37. S. Walsh and D. Diamond, Talanta, 1995, 42, 561-572. 38. R. B. Martin, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 3043-3064. 39. Y. Cohen, L. Avram and L. Frish, Angew. Chem. Intl. Edn., 2005, 44, 520-554. 40. K. A. Dill and S. Bromberg, Molecular Driving Forces: statistical thermodynamics in chemistry and biology, Garland Science, New York, 2003. 41. L. D. Williams, B. Chawla and B. R. Shaw, Biopolymers, 1987, 26, 591-603. 42. G. Gottarelli, S. Masiero, E. Mezzina, G. P. Spada, P. Mariani and M. Recanatini, Helv. Chim. Acta,, 1998, 81, 2078-2092. 43. G. Gottarelli, S. Masiero, E. Mezzina, S. Pieraccini, J. P. Rabe, P. Samori and G. P. Spada, Chem. Eur. J, 2000, 6, 3242-3248. 44. T. Giorgi, F. Grepioni, I. Manet, P. Mariani, S. Masiero, E. Mezzina, S. Pieraccini, L. Saturni, G. P. Spada and G. Gottarelli, Chem. Eur. J, 2002, 8, 2143- 2152. 45. M. C. Masiker, C. L. Mayne and E. M. Eyring, Magn. Reson. Chem., 2006, 44, 220-229. 46. C. Nativi, M. Cacciarini, O. Francesconi, A. Vacca, G. Moneti, A. Ienco and S. Roelens, J Am Chem Soc, 2007, 129, 4377-4385. 47. C. S. Wilcox, J. J. C. Adrian, T. H. Webb and F. J. Zawacki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 10189-10197. 48. A. Vacca, C. Nativi, M. Cacciarini, R. Pergoli and S. Roelens, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 16456-16465. 49. S. C. Zimmerman, P. S. Corbin and B. Xie, Struct. Bond., 2000, 96, 63-94. 50. MOE2006.08, Chemical Computing Group, Montreal, 2006. 51. Z. Rodriguez-Docampo, S. I. Pascu, S. Kubik and S. Otto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 11206-11210. 52. S. Otto, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2006, 2861-2864. 53. J. Hamacek and C. Piguet, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 7783-7792. 54. A. Horovitz and A. R. Fersht, J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 214, 613-617. 55. J. Wyman and S. J. Gill, Binding and linkage: functional chemistry of biological macromolecules, University Science Books, Mill Valley, Calif., 1990. 56. E. Di Cera, Thermodynamic theory of site-specific binding processes in biological macromolecules, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/27963

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us