Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Evidence for an attentional bias for washing- and checking-relevant stimuli in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Moritz, Steffen, von Muehlenen, Adrian, Randjbar, Sarah, Fricke, Susanne and Jelinek, Lena. (2009) Evidence for an attentional bias for washing- and checking-relevant stimuli in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Vol.15 (No.3). pp. 365-371. ISSN 1355-6177

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709090511

Abstract

There is equivocal evidence whether or not patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) share ail attentional bias for concern-related material and if so, whether this reflects hypervigilance towards or problems to disengage from disorder-related material. In a recent Study, we failed to detect ail attentional bias in OCD patients using an emotional variant of the inhibition of return ([OR) paradigm containing OCD-relevant and neutral words. We reinvestigated the research question with a more stringent design that addressed potential moderators. A new IOR paradigm was set up using visual stimuli. Forty-two OCD patients and 3 1 healthy controls were presented with neutral (e.g., cut)), anxiety-relevant (e.g., shark), checking-relevant (e.g., broken door), and washing-relevant (e.g., dirty toilet) Cue Pictures at one of two possible locations. Following a short or long interval sensitive to automatic versus controlled processes, a simple tat-get stimulus appeared at either the cued or the uncued location. OCD patients responded significantly slower to targets that were preceded by in OCD-relevant cue. Results lend support to the claim that OCD patients share a processing abnormality for concern-related visual Material. (JINS, 2009, 15, 365-371.)

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Obsessive-compulsive disorder, Attention, Selectivity (Psychology), Anxiety disorders
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 1355-6177
Date: May 2009
Volume: Vol.15
Number: No.3
Number of Pages: 7
Page Range: pp. 365-371
Identification Number: 10.1017/S1355617709090511
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/27971

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us