The relationship between the Keirsey Temperament Sorter and the short-form Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
Francis, Leslie J., Craig, Charlotte L. and Robbins, Mandy. (2008) The relationship between the Keirsey Temperament Sorter and the short-form Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Journal of Individual Differences, Vol.29 (No.2). pp. 116-120. ISSN 1614-0001
WRAP_FRancis_0673558-ie-160210-kts_epq.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.29.2.116
The two models of personality proposed by the Keirsey Temperament Sorter (KTS) and by the short-form Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-S) both propose measures of extraversion-introversion, but in other respects the two models are quite different. While the KTS proposes measures of sensing-intuition, thinking-feeling, and judging-perceiving, the EPQR-S proposes measures of neuroticism, psychoticism, and a lie scale. In order to test the comparability of the two indices of extraversion-introversion and the independence of the other constructs, a sample of 554 undergraduate students attending a university-sector college in South Wales, in the United Kingdom, completed the KTS and the EPQR-S. The data demonstrate that the Keirsey Temperament Sorter scales map in quite a complex way onto the model of personality proposed by the EPQR-S.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education ( -2013)|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Maudsley personality inventory, Keirsey temperament sorter, Personality questionnaires -- Research, Typology (Psychology) -- Research|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Journal of Individual Differences|
|Publisher:||Hogrefe Publishing Corp.|
|Number of Pages:||5|
|Page Range:||pp. 116-120|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
Allmon, D.E., Page, D., & Roberts, R. (2000). Determinants of perceptions of cheating: Ethical orientation, personality and demographics. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 411-422.
Actions (login required)