Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Judgment and the reification of the faculties : A reconstructive reading of Arendt's Life of the Mind

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Fine, Robert (2008) Judgment and the reification of the faculties : A reconstructive reading of Arendt's Life of the Mind. Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol.34 (No.1-2). pp. 157-176. doi:10.1177/0191453707084279

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0191453707084279

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The core argument in this paper is that, to reconstruct the last unwritten section on Judging in Hannah Arendt's Life of the Mind, it is necessary to address what Arendt was doing with the book as a whole and how the different parts relate internally to one another. This is no easy matter, especially as the existing sections on Thinking and Willing are quite different in tone from one another. My proposition is that the work should be read as a critique of the life of the 'modern' mind, and especially of the differentiation of the modern mind into distinct and reified faculties. The work as a whole is an attempt to understand the distorted forms of modernization that result from the division of the life of the mind into opposing faculties. It is, so to speak, a critique of the combined and uneven development of the life of the modern mind. While Arendt famously argues that the activity of thinking itself conditions people against evildoing, the spectre that informs her analysis of both thinking and willing is the danger of nihilism inherent in these mental activities. The work raises vital questions concerning the conditions under which this danger is actualized and the means by which it might be averted. What this entails for our reconstruction of the missing section on judgment is that, rather than see it as the core of Arendt's contribution to political thought or as the promised solution to an impasse, we should explore the equivocations of judging. This aporetic reading of the text helps clarify Arendt's concerns over the separation of the life of the mind from the world and the role of both judging and understanding in renewing its connections to the world.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Arendt, Hannah, 1906-1975 -- Criticism and interpretation, Thought and thinking, Philosophy, Modern
Journal or Publication Title: Philosophy & Social Criticism
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 1461-734X
Official Date: January 2008
Dates:
DateEvent
January 2008UNSPECIFIED
Volume: Vol.34
Number: No.1-2
Number of Pages: 20
Page Range: pp. 157-176
DOI: 10.1177/0191453707084279
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us