Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The development of the Meaning in Life Index (MILI) and its relationship with personality and religious behaviours and beliefs among UK undergraduate students

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Francis, Leslie J. and Hills, P. R.. (2008) The development of the Meaning in Life Index (MILI) and its relationship with personality and religious behaviours and beliefs among UK undergraduate students. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, Vol.11 (No.2). pp. 211-220. ISSN 1367-4676

[img] PDF
WRAP_Francis_0673558-ie-160210-mili_pub.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (258Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13674670701243758

Abstract

The scales available for assessing meaning in life appear to be confounded with several related constructs, including purpose in life, satisfaction with life, and goal-directed behaviour. The Meaning in Life Index (MILI), a new instrument devised as a specific measure of meaning in life, was developed from responses to a pool of 22 items rated by a sample of 501 undergraduate students in Wales. The nine-item scale demonstrated sufficient face validity, internal consistency, and scale reliability to commend the instrument for future use. With respect to personality, the MILI scores were most strongly predicted by neuroticism (negatively), and less strongly by extraversion (positively) and psychoticism (negatively). With respect to several religious behavioural variables, those who attended church at least weekly returned significantly higher MILI scores than those who attended church less frequently. Intrinsic religiosity was the only orientation to be significantly associated with the MILI scale scores, although the magnitude of the association was smaller than anticipated. These results suggest that meaning in life is associated more strongly with individual differences in personality than with specific religious behaviours and attitudes. The implications of these results are discussed in terms of individual's personal values and attitudes that might underlie their experience of a meaning in life.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Meaning (Philosophy), College students -- Conduct of life -- Wales, College students -- Psychology, Psychological tests -- Research
Journal or Publication Title: Mental Health, Religion & Culture
Publisher: Routledge
ISSN: 1367-4676
Date: March 2008
Volume: Vol.11
Number: No.2
Page Range: pp. 211-220
Identification Number: 10.1080/13674670701243758
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432-443. Aspinwall, L. G., & Staudinger, U. M. (2003). A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Battista, J., & Almond, R. (1973). The development of meaning in life. Psychiatry, 36, 409-427. Bolt, M. (1975). Purpose in life and religious orientation. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 3, 116-118. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, Illinois: Aldine. Bugental, J. F. T. (1965). The search for authenticity: an existential-analytic approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1964). An experimental study in existentialism: the psychometric approach to Frankl‟s concept of noögenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical 15 Psychology, 20, 200-207. Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1969). Manual of instructions for the Purpose in Life test. Brookport, Ill.: Psychological Associates. Dufton, B. D., & Perlman, D. (1986). The association between religiosity and the Purpose-in-Life test: does it reflect purpose or satisfaction? Journal of Psychology and Theology, 14, 42-48. Ebersole, P., & Quiring, G.(1989). Social desirability in the Purpose-in-Life Test. Journal of Psychology, 123, 305-307. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton. Fabry, J. B. (1968). The pursuit of meaning. Boston: Beacon Press. Francis, L. J. (2007). Introducing the New Indices of Religious orientation (NIRO): conceptualisation and measurement. Mental Health, Religion and Culture (in press). Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B., & Phillipchalk, R. (1992). The development of an abbreviated form of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-A): its use among students in England, Canada, The USA and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 443-449. Frankl, V. E. (1955). The doctor and the soul. New York: Knopf. Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself; an enquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York: Rinehart. Gerwood, J. B., LeBlanc, M., & Piazza, N (1998). The Purpose-in-Life Test and religious denomination: Protestant and Catholic scores in an elderly population. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 49-53. Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Positive psychology in practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Maslow, A. M. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row. Meier, A., & Edwards, H. (1974). Purpose-in-Life Test and sex differences, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 384-386. Molcar, C. C., & Stümpfig, D. W. (1988). Effects of world view on purpose in life. Journal of Psychology, 122, 365-371. Paloutzian, R. F., Jackson, S. L., & Crandall, J. E. (1978). Conversion experience, belief systems and personal ethical attitudes. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 6, 266-275. Pearson, P. R., & Sheffield, B. F. (1974). Purpose in life and the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 562-564. Pearson, P. R., & Sheffield, B. F. (1989). Psychoticism and purpose in life. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1321-1322. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14. Shek, D. T. L. (1988). Reliability and factorial validity of the Chinese version of the purpose in life questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 384-392. Shostrom, E. L. (1965). A test for the measurement of self-actualisation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 24, 207-218. Soderstrom, D., & Wright, E. W. (1977). Religious orientation and meaning in life. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 65-68. Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. (2001). Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. Weinstein, L., & Cleanthous, C. C. (1996). A comparison of protestant ministers and parishioners on expressed purpose in life and intrinsic religious motivation. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 33, 26-29.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2863

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us