Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Systematic review of accuracy of screening instruments for predicting fall risk among independently living older adults

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Gates, Simon, Smith, Lesley A., OTR, Fisher, Joanne D. and Lamb, S. E. (Sallie E.) (2008) Systematic review of accuracy of screening instruments for predicting fall risk among independently living older adults. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol.45 (No.8). pp. 1105-1116. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2008.04.0057

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2008.04.0057

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to summarize the evidence on the accuracy of screening tools for predicting falling risk in community-living older adults. This study was designed as a systematic review. Prospective studies of clinical fall risk prediction tools that provided data on the number of participants who sustained falls during follow-up were included. We searched six electronic databases and reference lists Of Studies and review articles. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently, and methodological quality assessment was performed with a modified version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies checklist. Twenty-five studies were included. These studies evaluated 29 different screening tools, but only 6 of the tools were evaluated by more than one study. Methodological quality was variable, and many studies were small. No meta-analyses were performed because of heterogeneity. Most tools discriminated poorly between fallers and nonfallers. We found that existing Studies are methodologically variable and the results are inconsistent. Insufficient evidence exists that any screening instrument is adequate for predicting falls.

Item Type: Journal Item
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Systematic reviews (Medical research), Older people -- Health risk assessment, Falls (Accidents) in old age, Medical screening
Journal or Publication Title: The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Publisher: Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration
ISSN: 0748-7711
Official Date: 2008
Dates:
DateEvent
2008Published
Volume: Vol.45
Number: No.8
Number of Pages: 12
Page Range: pp. 1105-1116
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2008.04.0057
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Great Britain. National Health Service (NHS)
Grant number: SDO/139/2006 (NHS)

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us