Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Attitude toward Muslim Proximity Index (AMPI): a measure of social distance

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Brockett, Adrian, Village, Andrew and Francis, Leslie J.. (2009) Internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Attitude toward Muslim Proximity Index (AMPI): a measure of social distance. British Journal of Religious Education, Vol.31 (No.3). pp. 241-249. ISSN 0141-6200

[img] PDF
WRAP_Francis_0673558-ie-170210-attitude_toward_muslim_proximity_index.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (204Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01416200903112417

Abstract

The Attitude toward Muslim Proximity Index (AMPI) is a six-item scale that uses tolerance to different degrees of social distance to assess prejudice towards Muslims. It was tested on 1777 teenage school children from northern England who indicated their religion as either 'Christian' or 'no religion', and demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .81). The index was higher among pupils who supported the views of the British National Party and among those who believed that British Muslims should adopt Western culture; but lower among those who knew Muslims or had Muslim friends. The AMPI is a useful measure of Islamophobic attitudes that does not rely on responses to specific events or on detailed knowledge of the Muslim religion.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Social distance, Islamophobia -- England, Adolescent psychology -- England, Likert scale -- England, Teenagers -- Religious life -- England
Journal or Publication Title: British Journal of Religious Education
Publisher: Routledge
ISSN: 0141-6200
Date: September 2009
Volume: Vol.31
Number: No.3
Number of Pages: 9
Page Range: pp. 241-249
Identification Number: 10.1080/01416200903112417
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Alexander, L., and B. Link. 2003. The impact of contact on stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness. Journal of Mental Health 12, no. 3: 271-289. Angermeyer, M.C., and H. Matschinger. 1997. Social distance towards the mentally ill: Results of representative surveys in the Federal Republic of Germany. Psychological Medicine 27, no. 1: 131-141. Bogardus, E.S. 1928. Immigration and race attitudes. Lexington, MA: Heath. ———. 1959. Social distance. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press. Brinkerhoff, M.B., and J.C. Jacob. 1994. Racial, ethnic and religious social distance in Surinam: An exploration of the 'Strategic Alliance Hypothesis' in a Caribbean community Ethnic and Racial Studies 17, no. 4: 636-661. Brockett, A.A., N. Noret, S. Harenwall, P.D. Baird, and I. Rivers. 2007. Adolescent attitudes in York toward Muslims and Islam. In Community identity: Dynamics of religion in context, edited by S. C. H. Kim and P. Kollontai. London: T & T Clark. Brockman, J., and C. D'Arcy. 1978. Correlates of attitudinal social distance toward the mentally ill: A review and re-survey Journal Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 13, no. 2: 69-77. Corrigan, P.W., A.B. Edwards, A. Green, S.L. Thwart, and D.L. Perm. 2001. Prejudice, social distance, and familiarity with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin 27, no. 2: 219-225. Cronbach, L.J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297-334. Duriez, B., and D. Hutsebaut. 2000. The relation between religion and racism: The role of post-critical beliefs. Mental Health, Religion and Culture 3, no. 1: 85-102. Eisinga, R., J. Billiet, and A. Felling. 1999. Christian religion and ethnic prejudice in cross-national perspective: A comparative analysis of the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium) International Journal of Comparative Sociology 40, no. 3: 375-393. Ethington, P.J. 2007. The intellectual construction of "Social Distance": Toward a recovery of Georg Simmel’s social geometry. European Journal of Geography, http://www.cybergeo.eu/index227.html. Field, C.D. 2007. Islamophobia in contemporary Britain: The evidence of the opinion polls, 1988-2006. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 18, no. 4: 447-477. Hughes, M., and S.A. Tuch. 2003. Gender differences in whites' racial attitudes: Are women's attitudes really more favorable? . Social Psychology Quarterly 66, no. 4: 384-401. Jacobson, C.K. 1998. Religiosity and prejudice: An update and denominational analysis. Review of Religious Research 39, no. 3: 264-272. Johnson, M.K., and M.M. Marini. 1998. Bridging the racial divide in the United States: The effect of gender. Social Psychology Quarterly 61: 247-58. Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. New York: Columbia University Press. McLaren, L.M. 2003. Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces 81, no. 3: 909-936. Office for National Statistics. 2003. Key statistics for England and Wales. London: HMSO. Pettigrew, T.F. 1998. Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology 49, no. 1: 65-85. Pettigrew, T.F., J.S. Jackson, J.B. Brika, G. Lemaine, R.W. Meertens, U. Wagner, and A. Zick. 1997. Outgroup prejudice in Western Europe. European Review of Social Psychology 8, no. 1: 241-273. Pettigrew, T.F., and R.W. Meertens. 1995. Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology 25, no. 1: 57-75. Pettigrew, T.F., and L.R. Tropp. 2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90, no. 5: 751-83. Smith, D.L., and W.K. Kay. 2000. Religious terms and attitudes in the classroom (part 2). British Journal of Religious Education 22, no. 3: 181-191. Stephan, W.G., O. Ybarra, and G. Bachman. 1999. Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29, no. 11: 2221-2237. Westie, F.R. 1953. A technique for the measurement of race attitudes. American Sociological Review 18, no. 1: 73-78.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2872

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us