Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Psychological type and the pulpit : an empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Francis, Leslie J., Robbins, Mandy and Village, Andrew. (2009) Psychological type and the pulpit : an empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics. Hervormde Teologiese Studies, Vol.65 (No.1). pp. 171-177. ISSN 0259-9422

[img] PDF
WRAP_Francis_0673558-ie-170210-psychological_type.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (268Kb)
Official URL: http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_art...

Abstract

A sample of 389 experienced preachers completed a measure of psychological type. They then read Mark 1:29-39 and recorded their evaluations of the four reflections on this passage proposed by Francis (1997) and which were derived from the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics and liturgical preaching. Three main conclusions are drawn from these data. First, compared with the United Kingdom population norms, preachers within this sample were significantly more likely to prefer introversion, intuition, feeling and judging. Second, preachers were four times more likely to prefer a sensing interpretation of the text rather than a thinking interpretation, emphasising the richness of the narrative rather than facing the theological questions posed by it. Third, there was little evidence to suggest that preachers were less likely to appreciate interpretations consonant with their less preferred or inferior function than those consonant with their most preferred or dominant function. In this sense, the richness of the SIFT method should be accessible to preachers of all psychological types.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BS The Bible
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Bible. N.T. Mark, Typology (Psychology) -- Religious aspects -- Christianity, Bible -- Hermeneutics, Preaching -- Research
Journal or Publication Title: Hervormde Teologiese Studies
Publisher: University of Pretoria
ISSN: 0259-9422
Date: 2009
Volume: Vol.65
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 7
Page Range: pp. 171-177
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Baab, L. M. (1998). Personality type in congregations: How to work with others more effectively. Washington, DC: Alban Institute. Bassett, R. L., Mathewson, K., & Gailitis, A. (1993). Recognising the person in biblical interpretation: An empirical study. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 12, 38-46. Bigelow, E. D., Fitzgerald, R., Busk, P., Girault, E., & Avis, J. (1988). Psychological characteristics of Catholic sisters: Relationships between the MBTI and other measures. Journal of Psychological Type, 14, 32-36. Cabral, G. (1984). Psychological types in a Catholic convent: Applications to community living and congregational data. Journal of Psychological Type, 8, 16-22. Craig, C. L., Duncan, B., & Francis, L. J. (2006). Psychological type preferences of Roman Catholic priests in the United Kingdom. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 27, 157-164. Craig, C., Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2004). Psychological type and sex differences among church leaders in the United Kingdom. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 25, 3-13. Craig, C. L. Horsfall, T., & Francis, L. J. (2005). Psychological types of male missionary personnel training in England: a role for thinking type men? Pastoral Psychology, 53, 475-482. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. Duncan, B. (1993). Pray your way: Your personality and God. London: Darton, Longman and Todd. Francis, L. J. (1997). Personality type and scripture: Exploring Marks’ gospel. London: Mowbray. Francis, L. J. (2003). Psychological type and biblical hermeneutics: SIFT method of preaching. Rural Theology, 1, 13-23. Francis, L. J. (2005). Faith and psychology: Personality, religion and the individual. London: Darton, Longman and Todd. Francis, L. J. (2006a). Psychological type and liturgical preaching: The SIFT method. Liturgy, 21(3), 11-20. Francis, L. J. (2006b). Mark and psychological type. In J. Vincent (Ed.) Mark’s Gospel of action: Personal and community responses (pp. 98-108). London: SPCK. Francis, L. J. (2007). Psychological types. In F. Watts (Ed.) Jesus and psychology (pp. 137-154). London: Darton, Longman and Todd. Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2000). Exploring Luke’s Gospel: A guide to the gospel readings in the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Mowbray. Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2001). Exploring Matthew’s Gospel: A guide to the gospel readings in the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Mowbray. Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2002). Exploring Mark’s Gospel: An aid for readers and preachers using year B of the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Continuum. Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., & Butler, A. (2007). Psychological types of male evangelical Anglican seminarians in England. Journal of Psychological Type, 67, 11-17, 2007. Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., Horsfall, T., & and Ross, C. F. J. (2005). Psychological types of male and female evangelical lay church leaders in England, compared with United Kingdom population norms. Fieldwork in Religion, 1, 69-83. Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., Whinney, M., Tilley, D., & Slater, P. (2007). Psychological profiling of Anglican clergy in England: Employing Jungian typology to interpret diversity, strengths, and potential weaknesses in ministry. International Journal of Practical Theology, 11, 266-284. Francis, L. J., Gubb, S., & Robbins, M. (in press). Psychological type profile of Lead Elders within the Newfrontiers network of churches in the United Kingodm. Francis, L. J., & Jones, S. H. (1999). The scale properties of the MBTI Form G (Anglicised) among adult churchgoers. Pastoral Sciences, 18, 107-126. Francis, L. J., Nash, P., Nash, S., & Craig, C. L. (2007). Psychology and youth ministry: Psychological type preferences of Christian youth workers in the United Kingdom. Journal of Youth Ministry, 5(2), 73-90. Francis, L. J., Payne, V. J., & Jones, S. H. (2001). Psychological types of male Anglican clergy in Wales. Journal of Psychological Type, 56, 19-23. Francis, L. J., Penson, A. W., & Jones, S. H. (2001). Psychological types of male and female Bible College students in England. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 4, 23-32. Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2002). Psychological types of male evangelical church leaders. Journal of Belief and Values, 23, 217-220. Francis, L. J., & Village, A. (2008). Preaching with all our souls: A study in hermeneutics and psychological type. London: Continuum. Goldsmith, M., & Wharton, M. (1993). Knowing me knowing you. London: SPCK. Greenfield, M. (1969). Typologies of persisting and non-persisting Jewish clergymen. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 16, 368-372. Harbaugh, G. L. (1984). The person in ministry: psychological type and the seminary. Journal of Psychological Type, 8, 23-32. Holsworth, T. E. (1984). Type preferences among Roman Catholic seminarians. Journal of Psychological Type, 8, 33-35. Irvine, A. R. (1989). Isolation and the parish ministry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of St Andrews. Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types: The collected works, volume 6. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Kay, W. K., & Francis, L. J. (2008). Psychological type preferences of female Bible College students in England. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 29, 101-105. Kay, W. K., Francis, L. J., & Craig, C. L. (2008). Psychological type preferences of male British Assemblies of God Bible College students: Tough minded or tender hearted? Journal of the European Pentecostal Theological Association, 28, 6-20. Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. (1978). Please understand me. Del Mar, California: Prometheus Nemesis. Kendall, E. (1998). Myers-Briggs type indicator: Step 1 manual supplement. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press. Leech, K. (Ed.) (1996). Myers-Briggs: Some critical reflections. Croydon: The Jubilee Group. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55. Lloyd, J. B. (2007). Opposition from Christians to Myers-Briggs personality typing: An analysis and evaluation. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 28, 111-123. Macdaid, G. P., McCaulley, M. H., & Kainz, R.I. (1986). Myers-Briggs type indicator: Atlas of type tables. Gainesville, Florida: Centre for Application of Psychological Type Inc. Michael, C. P., & Norrisey, M. C. (1984). Prayer and temperament: Different prayer forms for different personality types. Charlottesville, Virginia: The Open Door. Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press. Osborn, L., & Osborn, D. (1991). God's diverse people. London: Daybreak. Ryland, A., Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (in press). Called for leadership: Psychological type profile of leaders within the Newfrontiers network of churches in the United Kingdom. Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2005). The relationship of psychological type preferences to biblical interpretation. Journal of Empirical Theology, 18, 74-89.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2873

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us