Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Democratization, sequencing, and state failure in Africa: lessons from Kenya

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Branch, Daniel, 1978- and Cheeseman, Nic. (2009) Democratization, sequencing, and state failure in Africa: lessons from Kenya. African Affairs, Vol.108 (No.430). pp. 1-26. ISSN 0001-9909

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adn065

Abstract

In order to complement ongoing current empirical research, this article draws wider lessons from the crisis that grew out of the disputed Kenyan presidential election of December 2007. Looking beyond the immediate trigger for the subsequent violence - namely, the election itself - the paper instead locates the roots of the crisis within three historical trends: elite fragmentation, political liberalization, and state informalization.The origins of each can be traced to the style of rule employed by Daniel arap Moi. Even though his first government of 2002-5 perpetuated these trends, President Mwai Kibaki failed to recognize their implications for national unity and the exercise of power in 2007. The article then addresses the sequencing debate within the literature on democratization, identifying the lessons that can be taken from the Kenyan case for other states. Kenya has shown again that political liberalization is a high-risk activity that can produce unintended side-effects. Drawing on examples from other African states, we argue that the processes of democratization and reform can be undertaken simultaneously, but that this twin-tracked approach requires institutional reforms not yet undertaken by a large number of African polities.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: D History General and Old World > DT Africa
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
J Political Science > JC Political theory
Divisions: Faculty of Arts > History
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Kenya -- Politics and government -- 2002-, Democratization -- Kenya, Presidents -- Kenya -- Election, Democratization -- Africa, Kenya. National Assembly -- Elections, Democracy -- Kenya, Democracy -- Africa
Journal or Publication Title: African Affairs
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0001-9909
Date: January 2009
Volume: Vol.108
Number: No.430
Number of Pages: 26
Page Range: pp. 1-26
Identification Number: 10.1093/afraf/adn065
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/28782

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us