The Library
From strategy to action involvement and influence in top level decisions
Tools
Miller, Susain, Hickson, David John and Wilson, David C. (David Charles), 1951-. (2008) From strategy to action involvement and influence in top level decisions. Long Range Planning, Vol.41 (No.6). pp. 606-628. ISSN 0024-6301
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.09.005
Abstract
Who are the key people involved in making and implementing the big decisions that set the strategic direction for a firm? Do those who decide also see things through to implementation - and who amongst them wields the most influence? Drawing on data from a study of the making and implementing of 55 decisions in 14 UK public and private sector organizations, this research aims to discover who is involved in creating and who in maintaining organisations' strategic initiatives, and who has most - and least - influence. The findings are that who is most often in, and who is most often out, is remarkably constant across every kind of organization. There is a core and periphery of strategic actors: in most organisations production/service delivery and marketing, together with the CEO, are the heavyweights, but finance and suppliers also help set the direction. This article therefore identifies the group that bears much of the responsibility for the success, or otherwise, of strategic decisions in organisations.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Marketing & Strategic Management Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Business planning, Marketing -- Management, Management -- Decision making |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Long Range Planning |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| ISSN: | 0024-6301 |
| Date: | December 2008 |
| Volume: | Vol.41 |
| Number: | No.6 |
| Number of Pages: | 23 |
| Page Range: | pp. 606-628 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.lrp.2008.09.005 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Publication Status: | Published |
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
| Funder: | U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences |
| Grant number: | DAJA 45-89-C-0037 (ARI) |
| References: | 1. A. Pye and A. Pettigrew, Strategizing and organizing: change as a political learning process enabled by leadership, Long Range Planning 39(6), 583e590 (2006). 2. P. C. Nutt, Surprising but true: half the decisions in organizations fail, Academy of Management Executive 13(4), 75e90 (1999). 3. D. J. Hickson, S. J. Miller and D. C. Wilson, Planned or prioritized? Two options in managing the implementation of strategic decisions, Journal of Management Studies 40(7), 1803e1836 (2003); S. Miller, D. C. Wilson and D. J. Hickson, Beyond planning: strategies for successfully implementing strategic decisions, Long Range Planning 37(3), 201e218 (2004). 4. P. Pitcher and A. D. Smith, Top management team heterogeneity: personality, power and proxies, Organization Science 12(1), 1e18 (2001) The quote is from p.1. 5. D. C. Hambrick and P. A. Mason, Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers, Academy of Management Review 9, 193e206 (1984); R. E. Freeman, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Harper and Collins, New York (1984); J. L. Cotton, Employee Involvement, Sage, London (1993). 6. S. Finkelstein and D. C. Hambrick, Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion, Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 484e503 (1990); R. E. Freeman and D. L. Reed, Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance, California Management Review 25(3), 88e106 (1983); J. Mohr and R. Spekman, Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior and conflict resolution techniques, Strategic Management Journal 15(2), 135e152 (1994); P. Brews and D. Purohit, Strategic planning in unstable environments, Long Range Planning 40(1), 9e29 (2007). 7. D. P. Ashmos, D. Duchon, R. R. McDaniel and J. W. Huonker, What a mess! Participation as a simple managerial rule to ‘complexify’ organizations, Journal of Management Studies 39(2), 189e206 (2002). 8. A. Pettigrew, E. Ferlie and L. McKee, Shaping Strategic Change, Sage Publications, London (1992). 9. C. R. Hinings, D. J. Hickson, J. M. Pennings and R. E. Schneck, Structural conditions of intraorganizational power, Administrative Science Quarterly 19(1), 22e44 (1974). 10. C. Moorman and A. S. Miner, Organizational improvisation and organizational memory, Academy of Management Review 23(4), 698e724 (1998). 11. M. A. Cohen, J. G. March and J. P. Olsen, The garbage can model of organizational choice, Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 1e25 (1972). 12. R. Cyert and J. G. March, A Behavioural Theory of the Firm, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.Y. (1963). 13. P. Regne´r, Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy making, Journal of Management Studies 40(1), 57e82 (2003). 14. J. W. J. Dean and M. P. Sharfman, Procedural rationality in the strategic decision making process, Journal of Management Studies 30, 607e630 (1993); K. M. Eisenhardt and M. J. Zbaracki, Strategic decision making, Strategic Management Journal 13(Winter), 17e37 (1992); P. C. Nutt, Leverage, resistance and the success of implementation approaches, Journal of Management Studies 35(2), 213e240 (1998). 15. See the original study D. J. Hickson et al. (2003) op. cit at Ref 3. Success was conceptualized as achievement and the scale (see Table 1) was developed by the researchers through an iterative process of case comparison to ascertain the conceptualization of success and the placing of each case on the scale. 16. D. Katz and R. L. Kahn, The Social Psychology of Organizations, Wiley, New York (1966). 17. K. M. Eisenhardt, J. L. Kahwajy and L. J. I. Bourgeois, Conflict and strategic choice: how top management teams disagree, California Management Review 39(2), 42e62 (1997). 18. D. Knights and G. Morgan, Corporate strategy, organizations and subjectivity, Organization Studies 12(2), 251e273 (1991). 19. C. R. Hinings et al., op. cit. (1974). 20. D. Miller, What happens after success: the perils of excellence, Journal of Management Studies 31(3), 325e358 (1994). 21. D. J. Hickson, R. J. Butler, D. Cray, G. R. Mallory and D. C. Wilson, Top Decisions: Strategic Decision Making in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, (1986) The quote is from p. 247. 22. S. Clegg, C. Carter, M. Kornberger and Get up, I feel like being a strategy machine, European Management Review 1(1), 21e28 (2004). 23. J. Balogun, Managing change: steering a course between intended strategies and unanticipated outcomes, Long Range Planning 39(1), 29e49 (2006). 24. P. Jarzabkowski, Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change, Journal of Management Studies 40, 23e55 (2003). 25. T. Watson, In Search of Management: Culture, Chaos and Control in Managerial Work, Routledge, London (1994). 26. D. C. Wilson, Electricity and resistance: a case study of innovation and politics, Organization Studies 3(2), 119e140 (1982); S. Miller, Implementing strategic decisions: four key success factors, Organization Studies 18(4), 577e602 (1997); S. B. Rodrigues and D. J. Hickson, Success in decision making: different organizations, differing reasons for success, Journal of Management Studies 32(5), 655e678 (1995). |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/28795 |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

