Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Seeing is not enough : manipulating choice options causes focusing and preference change in multiattribute risky decision-making

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Vlaev, Ivo, Chater, Nick and Stewart, Neil (2008) Seeing is not enough : manipulating choice options causes focusing and preference change in multiattribute risky decision-making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol.21 (No.5). pp. 556-574. doi:10.1002/bdm.601 ISSN 0894-3257.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.601

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

We show that preferences depend on the attributes that can be directly manipulated when people need to integrate multiple sources of information because direct manipulation causes focusing bias. This effect appears even when all relevant information is simultaneously and explicitly presented at the time the decisions are made. Participants decided how much to save, what investment risk to take and observed the future financial consequences in terms of the mean and variability of the expected retirement income. Participants who manipulated only the future income distribution saved more and took less risk. This effect disappears when the risk-related variables are removed. which indicates that task complexity is a mediator of such focusing effects. A more balanced trade-off between the choice attributes was selected when all attributes were manipulated. However, when there is a dichotomy between manipulating versus observing choice attributes, then decisions were based mostly on the manipulated attributes. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons. Ltd.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > HG Finance
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Behavioural Science
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Corporations -- Finance -- Management, Finance -- Decision making, Business enterprises -- Finance -- Management, Saving and investment, Risk
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISSN: 0894-3257
Official Date: December 2008
Dates:
DateEvent
December 2008Published
Volume: Vol.21
Number: No.5
Number of Pages: 19
Page Range: pp. 556-574
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.601
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us