Goodall, Amanda. (2008) Why have the leading journals in management (and other social sciences) failed to respond to climate change? Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol.17 (No.4). pp. 408-420. ISSN 1056-4926

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The effect of climate change on business is likely to be substantial. It might be expected, therefore, that the scholarly field of business and management would be centrally engaged with the challenges that global warming will bring. Yet, in this article, the author shows that the most cited management journals have barely published an article on the topic. Similarly, low numbers of articles appear in the prestigious journals in economics, sociology, and political science. Why have the top journals failed to respond? The author proposes five possible explanations. Among these five explanations, the author emphasize the existence of an undesirable delay between ideas appearing first in peripheral publications and then in the elite journals.

[error in script] [error in script]

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Climatic changes -- Economic aspects, Global warming -- Economic aspects, Industrial management -- Periodicals, Management -- Periodicals, Business -- Periodicals, Social sciences -- Periodicals
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Management Inquiry
Publisher:	Sage Publications, Inc.
ISSN:	1056-4926
Date:	December 2008
Volume:	Vol.17
Number:	No.4
Number of Pages:	13
Page Range:	pp. 408-420
Identification Number:	10.1177/1056492607311930
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/29010

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item