Afshar, H., & Maynard, M. (Eds.). (1994). The dynamics of “race” and gender: Some feminist interventions.
London: Taylor & Francis.
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
Bograd, M. (1988). Introduction. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11-27).
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bryson, V. (1999). Patriarchy: A concept too useful to loose? Contemporary Politics, 5, 311-324.
Butler, J. (1992). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In J. Butler & J. Scott
(Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 3-21). New York: Routledge.
Chase, S. E., & Rogers, M. F. (2001). Mothers and children: Feminist analyses and personal narratives. New
Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Collins, P. H. (2004). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought.
In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 103-126).
New York: Routledge.
Crenshaw, K. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of
color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
Davies, L., & Krane, J. (2003). Critical reflections on practice with battered women: Insights from Maya’s story.
Atlantis, 28(1), 63-71.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge.
Evans, J. (1995). Feminist theory today: An introduction to second-wave feminism. London: Sage.
Fawcett, B., & Featherstone, B. (2000). Setting the scene: An appraisal of notions of postmodernism, postmodernity
and postmodern feminism. In B. Fawcett, B. Featherstone, J. Fook, & A. Rossiter (Eds.), Practice and
research in social work: Postmodern feminist perspectives (pp. 5-23). London: Routledge.
Featherstone, B. (1996). Victims or villains? Women who physically abuse their children. In B. Fawcett, B.
Featherstone, J. Hearn, & C. Toft (Eds.), Violence and gender relations. Theories and interventions (pp. 178-190).
London: Sage.
Featherstone, B. (1999). Taking mothering seriously: The implications for child protection. Child and Family
Social Work, 4, 43-53.
Featherstone, B., & Trinder, L. (1997). Familiar subjects? Domestic violence and child welfare. Child and Family
Social Work, 7, 147-159.
Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. London: Women’s Press.
Glenn, E. N. (1994). Social construction of mothering: A thematic overview. In E. N. Glenn, G. Chang, &
L. R. Forcey (Eds.), Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 1-29). New York: Routledge.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. New
York: Routledge.
Hartsock, N. (1990). Foucault on power: A theory for women? In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism
(pp. 157-175). New York: Routledge.
Hoff, L. A. (1988). Collaborative feminist research and the myth of objectivity. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.),
Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 269-281). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hollway, W., & Featherstone, B. (Eds.). (1997). Mothering and ambivalence. London: Routledge.
hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Hughes, C. (2002). Key concepts in feminist theory and research. London: Sage.
Jackson, S. (1998). Feminist social theory. In S. Jackson & J. Jones (Eds.), Contemporary feminist theories
(pp. 12-33). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Kelly, L. (1994). The interconnectedness of domestic violence and child abuse: Challenges for research, policy
and practice. In A. Mullender & R. Morley (Eds.), Children living with domestic violence (pp. 43-56). London:
Whiting & Birch.
Kelly, L., & Lovett, J. (2004). What a waste: An argument for an integrated approach to violence against women.
London: Child and Woman Abuse Unit, London Metropolitan University.
Krane, J., & Davies, L. (2002). Sisterhood is not enough: The invisibility of mothering in shelter practice with battered
women. Affilia, 17, 167-190.
Krane, J., Oxman-Martinez, J., & Ducey, K. (2000). Violence against women and ethnoracial minority women:
Examining assumptions about ethnicity and “race.” Canadian Ethnic Studies, 32(3), 1-18.
Lavergne, C., Jacob, M., & Chamberland, C. (2001, May 15). Contributions féministes à la compréhension des
mauvais traitements envers les enfants [Feminist contributions to the understanding of child maltreatment].
Paper presented at Violence envers les femmes et les enfants en contexte familial: Théories explicatives et données
empirique, 69e Congrès de l’ACFAS, University of Sherbrooke.
Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. Volcano, CA: Volcano Press.
Maynard, M. (1994). “Race,” gender and the concept of “difference” in feminist thought. In H. Afshar &
M. Maynard (Eds.), The dynamics of “race” and gender: Some feminist interventions (pp. 9-25). London:
Taylor & Francis.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771-1800.
Millett, K. (1969). Sexual politics. London: Virago.
Mosher, J. (1998). Caught in tangled webs of care: Women abused in intimate relationships. In C. Baines,
P. Evans, & S. Neysmith (Eds.), Women’s caring: Feminist perspectives on social welfare (pp. 139-159).
Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
Mullender, A., Hague, G., Imam, U., Kelly, L., Malos, E., & Regan, L. (2002). Children’s perspectives on domestic
violence. London: Sage.
Nicholson, L. J. (Ed.). (1990). Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
O’Reilly, A. (2004). Introduction. In A. O’Reilly (Ed.), From motherhood to mothering: The legacy of Adrienne
Rich’s Of Woman Born (pp. 1-23). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Oxman-Martinez, J., Krane, J., Corbin, M. & Loiselle-Léonard, M. (2002). Competing conceptions of conjugal
violence: Insights from an intersectional framework. Montreal, Canada: Centre for Applied Family Studies,
McGill University.
Parker, R. (1997). The production and purpose of maternal ambivalence. In W. Hollway & B. Featherstone (Eds.),
Mothering and ambivalence (pp. 17-36). London: Routledge.
Radford, J. (1994). History of women’s liberation movements in Britain: A reflective personal history. In
B. Griffin, M. Hester, S. Rai, & S. Roseneil (Eds.), Stirring it: Challenges for feminism (pp. 40-58). London:
Taylor & Francis.
Radford, L., & Hester, M. (2006). Mothering through domestic violence. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Radford, J., Kelly L., & Hester, M. (1996). Introduction. In M. Hester, L. Kelly, & J. Radford (Eds.), Women, violence
and male power (pp. 1-16). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Ramazanoglu, C. & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rich, A. (1976). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. London: Virago Press.
Roberts, H. (Ed.). (1981). Doing feminist research. London: Routledge.
Scott, J. W. (1992). Experience. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 3-21). New
York: Routledge.
Sokoloff, N. J., & Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges
and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence
Against Women, 11(1), 38-64.
Stark, E. & Flitcraft, A. (1988). Women and children at risk: A feminist perspective on child abuse. International
Journal of Health Services, 18, 87-118.
Tanesini, A. (1999). An introduction to feminist epistemologies. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Truman, C. (1994). Feminist challenges to traditional research: Have they gone far enough? In B. Humphries &
C. Truman (Eds.), Re-thinking social research: Anti-discrimination in research methodology (pp. 21-36).
Aldershot, England: Avebury.
Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.