Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The effect of spatial frequency content on parameters of eye movements

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Groner, Marina, Groner, Rudolf and von Muehlenen, Adrian. (2008) The effect of spatial frequency content on parameters of eye movements. Psychological Research, Vol.72 (No.6). pp. 601-608. ISSN 0340-0727

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0167-1

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine the influence of the spatial frequency content of natural images on saccadic size and fixation duration. In the first experiment 10 pictures of natural textures were low-pass filtered (0.04-0.76 cycles/deg) and high-pass filtered (1.91-19.56 cycles/deg) and presented with the unfiltered originals in random order, each for 10 s, to 18 participants, with the instruction to inspect them in order to find a suitable name. The participants' eye movements were recorded. It was found that low-pass filtered images resulted in larger saccadic amplitudes compared with high-pass filtered images. A second experiment was conducted with natural stimuli selected for different power spectra which supported the results outlined above. In general, low-spatial frequencies elicit larger saccades associated with shorter fixation durations whereas high-spatial frequencies elicit smaller saccades with longer fixation durations.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Q Science > QP Physiology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Eye -- Movements -- Psychological aspects, Vision perception, Image processing, Saccadic eye movements
Journal or Publication Title: Psychological Research
Publisher: Springer
ISSN: 0340-0727
Date: November 2008
Volume: Vol.72
Number: No.6
Number of Pages: 8
Page Range: pp. 601-608
Identification Number: 10.1007/s00426-008-0167-1
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Funder: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung [Swiss National Science Foundation] (SNSF)
References: Andrews, T. J., & Coppola, D. M. (1999). Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing diVerent visual environments. Vision Research, 39, 2947–2953. Becker, W. R., & Jürgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic eye movement system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19, 967–983. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1975). Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of the transient and sustained channels. Vision Research, 15, 1411–1412. Buswell, G. (1935). How people look at pictures. A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Deubel, H., & Elsner, T. (1986). Threshold perception and saccadic eye movements. Biological Cybernetics, 54, 351–358. Di Lollo, V., & Woods, E. (1981). Duration of visible persistence in relation to range of spatial frequencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 754–769. Findlay, J. M. (1982). Global processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 22, 1033–1045. Groner, R., & Menz C. (1985) The eVects of stimulus characteristics, task requirements and individual diVerences on scanning patterns. In R. Groner, G. W. McConkie & C. Menz (Eds.), Eye movements and human information processing (pp. 239–250). Amsterdam: North Holland. Heller, D., & Müller, H. (1983). On the relationship between saccadic size and Wxation duration in reading. In R. Groner, C. Menz, D. F. Fisher & R. A. Monty (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological functions: International views (pp. 287–302). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 269–293). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., Jr., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). EVects of semantic consistency on eye movements during scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210–228. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506. Krieger, G., Rentschler, I., Hauske, G., Schill, K., & Zetzsche, C. (2000). Object and scene analysis by saccadic eye-movements: An investigation with higher-order statistics. Spatial Vision, 13, 201–214. Land, M. F., & Hayhoe, M. (2001). In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Research, 41, 3559– 3565. Lupp, U., Hauske, G., & Wolf, W. (1976). Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research, 16, 969–972. Mannan, S., Ruddock, K. H., & Wooding, D. S. (1995). Automatic control of saccadic eye-movements made in visual inspection of brieXy presented 2-D images. Spatial Vision, 9, 363–385. Mannan, S. K., Ruddock, K. H., & Wooding, D. S. (1996). The relationship between the locations of spatial features and those of Wxations made during visual examination of brieXy presented images. Spatial Vision, 10, 165–188. Mannan, S. K., Ruddock, K. H., & Wooding, D. S. (1997). Fixation patterns made during brief examination of two-dimensional images. Perception, 26, 1059–1072. Menz, C., & Groner, R. (1986) Saccadic programming with multiple targets under diVerent task conditions. In K. O’Regan & A. Levy- Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 95–103). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland. Parkhurst, D. J., & Niebur, E. (2003). Scene content selected by active vision. Spatial Vision, 16, 125–154. Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42, 107–123. Peterzell, D. H., & Teller, D. Y. (1996). Individual diVerences in contrast sensitivity functions: The lowest spatial frequency channels. Vision Research, 36, 3077–3085. Salthouse, T. A., & Ellis, C. L. (1980). Determinants of eye-Wxation duration. American Journal of Psychology, 93, 207–234. Tatler, B. W., Baddeley, R. J., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2005). Visual correlates of Wxation selection: EVects of scale and time. Vision Research, 45, 643–659. Turano, K. A., Geruschat, D. R., & Baker, F. H. (2003). Oculomotor strategies for the direction of gaze tested with a real-world activity. Vision Research, 43, 333–346. Walther-Müller, P. U. (1993). Zur Messung von Augenbewegungen: Beschreibung der Software zur Analyse von Augenbewegungsdaten. Research Report 1993-3, Department of Psychology, University of Bern. Wilson, H. R., & Bergen, J. R. (1979). A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision. Vision Research, 19, 19–32. Yarbus, L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/29115

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us