Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The effects of long-day lighting and removal of young leaves on tomato yield

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Valdes, V. M., Woodward, G. C. and Adams, S. R. (Steven R.). (2010) The effects of long-day lighting and removal of young leaves on tomato yield. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, Vol.85 (No.2). pp. 119-124. ISSN 1462-0316

[img] PDF
WRAP_Valdes_0380313-hr-090310-jhsb_no_298-08_removal_of_young_leaves_revised_version.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (159Kb)
Official URL: http://www.jhortscib.org/Vol85/85_2/6.htm

Abstract

While low intensity long-day (LD) lighting has been shown to enhance the growth of young plants under low light levels, its effect on the yield of a long-season glasshouse tomato crop has not been previously examined. LD were provided by the use of tungsten lamps (2.8 μmol m-2 s-1 at approx. 0.5 m from the ground) between 04.00 h to sunrise and from sunset until 20.00 h (GMT). LD lighting increased leaf chlorophyll contents, and the numbers of flowers and fruits set per truss when the plants were young. However, this treatment did not affect the total yield of tomatoes. Different leaf removal treatments were applied within each glasshouse compartment. A previous experiment had shown that reducing the leaf area index (LAI) from 5.2 to 2.6, by removing old leaves, did not affect yield. It was also thought that removal of young leaves reduced the total vegetative sink-strength and favoured assimilate partitioning into the fruit. Therefore, removal of young leaves could increase fruit yield. In the present experiments, one-third of the leaves were removed in March (those immediately below each truss) and, subsequently, every third leaf was removed at an early stage of its development. This reduced the LAI from 4.1 to 2.9 and resulted in a loss of yield from 3 – 4 weeks after leaf removal until the end of the experiment, at which point there was an 8% loss of cumulative yield due to a reduction in the average number of fruits set per truss and in mean fruit weight. We postulate that the light which would have been intercepted by young photosynthetically-efficient leaves at the top of the canopy was intercepted instead by older leaves which were less efficient, reducing overall net canopy photosynthesis.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: S Agriculture > SB Plant culture
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Warwick HRI (2004-2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Tomatoes -- Growth -- Research, Plants -- Effect of light on -- Research, Plant propagation -- Research, Crop yields -- Research, Seedlings -- Growth -- Research
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology
Publisher: Headley Brothers Ltd.
ISSN: 1462-0316
Date: March 2010
Volume: Vol.85
Number: No.2
Page Range: pp. 119-124
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Great Britain. Dept. for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
Grant number: HH1329SPC (DEFRA), HH3603SPC (DEFRA)
References: ACOCK, B., CHARLES-EDWARDS, D. A., FITTER, D. J., HAND, D. W., LUDWIG, L. J., WARREN WILSON, J. and WITHERS, A. C. (1978). The contribution of leaves from different levels within a tomato crop to canopy net photosynthesis: an experimental examination of two canopy models. Journal of Experimental Botany, 29, 815-827. ADAMS, S. R. and LANGTON, F. A. (2005). Photoperiod and plant growth: a review. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 80, 2-10. ADAMS, S. R., VALDÉS, V. M. and LANGTON, F. A. (2008). Why does low intensity, long-day lighting promote growth in Petunia, Impatiens and tomato? Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 83, 609-615. ADAMS, S. R., WOODWARD, G. C. and VALDÉS, V. M. (2002). The effects of leaf removal and modifying temperature set-points with solar radiation on tomato yields. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 77, 733-738. ANDRIOLO, J. L., FALCAO, L. L., DUARTE, T. S. AND SKREBSKY, E. C. (2001). Defoliation of greenhouse tomato plants and its effects on dry matter accumulation and distribution to fruits. Acta Horticulturae, 559, 123-126. BOLAÑOS, J. A. and HSIAO, T. C. (1991). Photosynthetic and respiratory characterization of field grown tomato. Photosynthesis Research, 28, 21-32. DUECK, TH. A., GRASSHOFF, C., BROEKHUIJSEN, G. and MARCELIS, L. F. M. (2006). Efficiency of light energy used by leaves situated in different levels of a sweet pepper canopy. Acta Horticulturae, 711, 201-206. GABRIELSEN, E. K. (1948). Effects of different chlorophyll concentrations on photosynthesis in foliage leaves. Physiologia Plantarum, 1, 5–37. HAMER, P. J. C., ADAMS, S. R. and VALDÉS, V. M. (2004). The design and evaluation of a shade screen to overcome within-row variability of tomato crops grown in small experimental glasshouse compartments. Acta Horticulturae, 633, 67-73. HEUVELINK, E., BAKKER, M. J., ELINGS, A., KAARSEMAKER, R. and MARCELIS, L. F. M. (2005). Effect of leaf area on tomato yield. Acta Horticulturae, 691, 43-50. HOGEWONING, S. W., TROUWBORST, G., ENGBERS, G. J., HARBINSON, J., VAN IEPEREN, W., RUIJSCH, J., VAN KOOTEN, O., SCHAPENDONK, A. H. C. M. and POT, C. S. 2007. Plant physiological acclimation to irradiation by light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Acta Horticulturae, 761, 183-191. HURD, R. G. (1973). Long-day effects on growth and flower initiation of tomato plants in low light. Annals of Applied Biology, 73, 221-228. THOMAS, B. and VINCE-PRUE, D. (1997). Photoperiodism in Plants (2nd Edition). Academic Press, London. VAN DE VOOREN, J., WELLES, G. W. H. and HAYMAN, G. (1986). Glasshouse crop production. In: The Tomato Crop. A Scientific Basis for Improvement (Atherton, J. G. and Rudich, J., Eds.). Chapman and Hall, London, UK. 581-623. XIAO, S., VAN DER PLOEG, A., BAKKER, M. J., and HEUVELINK, E. (2004). Two instead of three leaves between tomato trusses: measured and simulated effects on partitioning and yield. Acta Horticulturae, 654, 303-308. XU, H. L., GAUTHIER, L., DESJARDINS, Y. and GOSSELIN, A. (1997). Photosynthesis in leaves, fruits, stem and petioles of greenhouse-grown tomato plants. Photosynthetica, 33, 113-123.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2912

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us