Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Comparing Imperfection Ratio and Imperfection Index for Graph Classes

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Koster, Arie M. C. A. and Wagler, Annegret K. (2008) Comparing Imperfection Ratio and Imperfection Index for Graph Classes. In: 5th ALIO/EURO Workshop on Applied Combinatorial Optimization, Paris, France, Oct 26-28, 2005. Published in: RAIRO - Operations Research, Vol.42 (No.4). pp. 485-500.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ro:2008030

Abstract

Perfect graphs constitute a well-studied graph class with a rich structure, reflected by many characterizations with respect to different concepts. Perfect graphs are, for instance, precisely those graphs G where the stable set polytope STAB(G) coincides with the fractional stable set polytope QSTAB(G). For all imperfect graphs G it holds that STAB(G). QSTAB(G). It is, therefore, natural to use the difference between the two polytopes in order to decide how far an imperfect graph is away from being perfect. We discuss three different concepts, involving the facet set of STAB(G), the disjunctive index of QSTAB(G), and the dilation ratio of the two polytopes. Including only certain types of facets for STAB(G), we obtain graphs that are in some sense close to perfect graphs, for example minimally imperfect graphs, and certain other classes of so-called rank-perfect graphs. The imperfection ratio has been introduced by Gerke and Mc-Diarmid [12] as the dilation ratio of STAB(G) and QSTAB(G), whereas Aguilera et al. [1] suggest to take the disjunctive index of QSTAB(G) as the imperfection index of G. For both invariants there exist no general upper bounds, but there are bounds known for the imperfection ratio of several graph classes [7,12]. Outgoing from a graph-theoretical interpretation of the imperfection index, we prove that there exists no upper bound on the imperfection index for those graph classes with a known bounded imperfection ratio. Comparing the two invariants on those classes, it seems that the imperfection index measures imperfection much more roughly than the imperfection ratio; we, therefore, discuss possible directions for refinements.

Item Type: Conference Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Mathematics
Journal or Publication Title: RAIRO - Operations Research
Publisher: E D P Sciences
ISSN: 0399-0559
Date: October 2008
Volume: Vol.42
Number: No.4
Number of Pages: 16
Page Range: pp. 485-500
Identification Number: 10.1051/ro:2008030
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Title of Event: 5th ALIO/EURO Workshop on Applied Combinatorial Optimization
Type of Event: Workshop
Location of Event: Paris, France
Date(s) of Event: Oct 26-28, 2005
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/29166

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us