Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Reporting and analysis of open-label extension studies of anti-epileptic drugs

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Maguire, Melissa J., Hemming, Karla, Hutton, Jane L. and Marson, A. G.. (2008) Reporting and analysis of open-label extension studies of anti-epileptic drugs. Epilepsy Research, Vol.81 (No.1). pp. 24-29. ISSN 0920-1211

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.04.007

Abstract

Purpose: Open-label extension studies, or follow-on randomised controlled trials (FORCTs) are widely believed to be prone to patient selection biases which may inflate effect estimates. This study investigates the reporting and analysis of efficacy outcomes in FORCTs and critically evaluates the associated underlying assumptions. We propose an alternative method of analysis, in line with that recommended in the analysis of RCTs, the intention to treat (ITT) approach, in which it is assumed that all patients who discontinue treatment are non-responders. Methods: A systematic review of FORCTs and randomised controlled trials (RCT) of topiramate, levetiracetam and gabapentin as adjuvant therapy in refractory adult epilepsy was conducted. Sample sizes and numbers of responders, along with reported outcomes were extracted. To evaluate the feasibility of the assumptions underlying the various methods of analysis, the most common causes of discontinuation were evaluated. For each FORCT, we compared the reported outcome to the proposed ITT analysis. Results: The 10 FORCT reports identified all excluded from the analysis patients who dropped out of the RCT. Adverse events or inefficacy were the main reasons for treatment discontinuation. Analysis based on the ITT method, led to smaller effect estimates than those reported. For example, a FORCT of levetiracetam reported a responder rate of 43%, which reduced to 28% under an ITT analysis, comparable to an ITT analysis outcome of 26% for the parent RCT. Conclusions: FORCTs can provide important information about tong-term efficacy and tolerability of newer therapies. However, current reporting methods are likely to be misleading as outcomes are reported for the subset of patients continuing with treatment at the end of the FORCT. Since the majority of patients who discontinue treatment do so for reasons associated with inefficacy, an analysis based on the ITT approach more closely reflects the outcomes of the patients. (C) 2008 Elsevier BX AR rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Statistics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Anticonvulsants -- Effectiveness, Clinical trials
Journal or Publication Title: Epilepsy Research
Publisher: Elsevier BV
ISSN: 0920-1211
Date: September 2008
Volume: Vol.81
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 6
Page Range: pp. 24-29
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.04.007
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Medical Research Council (Great Britain) (MRC)
Grant number: G0400642 (MRC)
References: Abou-khalil, B., Schaich, L., 2005. Long-term efficacy of levetiracetam for partial seizures. Seizure 14, 577—585. Anhut, H., Ashman, P.J., Feuerstein, T.J., Quebe-Fehling, E., Saunders, M., Baron, B.A., The International Gabapentin Study Group, 1995. Long-term safety and efficacy of gabapentin (Neurontin) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. J. Epilepsy 8 (1), 44—50. Ben-Menachem, E., 1995. Long-term follow-up of patients treated with topiramate for partial seizures. Epilepsia 36 (Suppl. 3), S152. Ben-Menachem, E., Henriksen, O., Dam, M., Mikkelsen, M., Schmidt, D., Reid, S., Reife, R., Kramer, L., Pledger, G., Karim, R., 1996. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of topiramate as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. Epilepsia 37 (6), 539—543. Betts, T., Waegemans, T., Crawford, P., 2000. A multi-centre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of two oral doses of levetiracetam, 2000 mg daily and 4000 mg daily, without titration in patients with refractory epilepsy. Seizure 9, 80—87. Cameron, N., Penovich, P.E., Ritter, F.J., Espe-Lillo, J., 1996. Openlabel study of UCB LO59 as add-on therapy in refractory partial epilepsy. Epilepsia 37 (Suppl. 5), 169. Cereghino, J.J., Biton, V., Abou-Khalil, B., Dreifuss, F., Gauer, L.J., Leppik, I., 2000. Levetiracetam for partial seizures: results of a double-blind randomised clinical trial. Neurology 55, 236—242. Dickersin, K., Scherer, R., Lefebvre, C., 1994. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 309, 1286—1291. Dowd, D., 2004. Breaching the contract: the ethics of nonpublication of research studies. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 158, 1014—1015. Elm, E.V., Altman, D.G., Egger, M., Pocock, S.J., Gøtzsche, P.C., Vandenbroucke, J.P., STROBE Initiative, 2007. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335, 806—808. Engelskjon, T., Johannessen, S.I., Kloster, R., Nakken, K., Lossius, R., Henriksen, O., 1993. Long term effect of topiramate in refractory partial epilepsy. Epilepsia 34 (Suppl. 2), 123. Fincham, R., Schottelius, D., 1995. Long term therapy with topiramate in patients with partial seizures. Epilepsia 36 (Suppl. 4), 56. Handforth, A., Treiman, D.M., 1994. Efficacy and tolerance of longterm, high-dose gabapentin: additional observations. Epilepsia 35 (5), 1032—1037. Hemming, K., Hutton, J.L., Maguire, M.J., Marson, A.G., 2008. Open-label extension studies and patient selection biases. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 14 (1), 141—144. Marson, A.G., Kadir, Z.A., Chadwick, D.W., 1997. New anti-epileptic drugs: a systematic review of their efficacy and tolerability. Epilepsia 38 (8), 859—880. Michelucci, R., Passarelli, D., Tassinari, C.A., 1996. Topiramate in the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy: a 2 year long-term follow-up. Epilepsia 37 (Suppl. 4), 70. Mikkelsen, M., Ostergaard, L., Dam, M., 1993. Topiramate as longterm treatment in refractory partial epilepsy. Epilepsia 34 (Suppl. 2), 123. Ojemann, L.M., Wilensky, A.J., Temkin, N.R., Chmelir, T., Ricker, B.A., Wallace, J., 1992. Long term treatment with gabapentin for partial epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 13, 159—165. Privitera, M., 1995. Long-term efficacy and safety of topiramate. Epilepsia 36 (Suppl. 3), S152. Privitera, M., Fincham, R., Penry, J., Reife, R., Kramer, L., Pledger, G., Karim, R., 1996. Topiramate placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial in refractory partial epilepsy using 600-, 800-, and 1,000-mg daily dosages. Neurology 46 (6), 1678—1683. Schear, M.J., Wiener, J.A., Rowan, A.J., 1991. Long term efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of partial seizures. Epilepsia 32 (Suppl. 3), 6. Sharief, M.K., Sander, J.W., Patsalos, P.N., Shorvon, S.D., 1993. Adjuvant topiramate in intractable partial epilepsy. Epilepsia 34 (Suppl. 6), 41. Sharief, M., Viteri, C., Ben-Menachem, E., Weber, M., Reife, R., Pledger, G., Karim, R., 1996. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 25, 217—224. Sivenius, J., Kalviainen, R., Ylinen, A., Riekkinen, P., 1991. Doubleblind study of gabapentin in the treatment of partial seizures. Epilepsia 32 (4), 539—542. Sivenius, J., Ylinen, A., Kalviainen, R., Riekkinen Sr., P.J., 1994. Long-term study with gabapentin in patients with drug-resistant epileptic seizures. Arch. Neurol. 51, 1047—1050. Tassinari, C.A., Michelucci, R., Chauvel, P., Chodkiewicz, J., Shorvon, S., Henriksen, O., Dam, M., Reife, R., Pledger, G., Karim, R., 1996. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate (600 mg daily) for the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy. Epilepsia 37 (8), 763—768. Taylor, G.J., Wainwright, P., 2005. Open label extension studies: research or marketing? Brit. Med. J. 331 (7516), 572—574. The US Gabapentin Study Group No 5, 1993. Gabapentin as add-on therapy in refractory partial epilepsy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Neurology 43, 2292— 2298. The US Gabapentin Study Group, 1994. The long-term safety and efficacy of gabapentin (Neurontin) as add-on therapy in drug resistant partial epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 18, 67—73.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/29192

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us