Newell, Susan and Edelman, Linda F. (2008) Developing a dynamic project learning and cross-project learning capability : synthesizing two perspectives. Information Systems Journal, Volume 18 (Number 6). pp. 567-591. ISSN 1350-1917

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Driven by the complexity of new products and services, project work has become increasingly common in all types of organizations. However, research on project learning suggests that often project teams do not meet their stated objectives and, moreover, there is limited organizational learning from the experiences of project work. We use the dynamic capabilities framework to argue that building a dynamic project learning capability is useful for organizations that make extensive use of projects. We use both survey and interview data to discuss the key ways in which such a dynamic capability can be built. Our survey data demonstrate the importance of documenting project learning, but our interview data show that teams are often remiss at documenting their learning. The results from the two different approaches are synthesized using Boland & Tenkasi's notions of perspective-making and perspective-taking. Importantly, combining the results from the two sets of data suggests that organizations need to emphasize the benefits from project reviews and documentation and explore ways in which the documents produced can be made more useful as boundary objects to encourage the sharing of learning across projects.

Item Type:	Journal Item
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Innovation, Knowledge & Organisational Networks Research Unit Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Information Systems & Management Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Organizational learning -- Case studies, Knowledge management, Structural equation modeling
Journal or Publication Title:	Information Systems Journal
Publisher:	John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISSN:	1350-1917
Date:	November 2008
Volume:	Volume 18
Number:	Number 6
Number of Pages:	25
Page Range:	pp. 567-591
Identification Number:	10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00242.x
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Afifi, A.A. & Elashoff, R.M. (1966) Missing observations in multivariate statistics. Part 1. Review of the literature. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61, 595– 604. Ayas, K. & Zeniuk, N. (2001) Project-based learning: building communities of reflective practitioners. Management Learning, 32, 61–76. Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 51, 1173– 1182. Berends, H., Boerstna, K. & Weggeman, M. (2003) The structuration of organizational learning. Human Relations, 56, 1035–1057. Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K. (1992) Qualitative Research for Education. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, USA. Boland, R. & Tenkasi, R. (1995) Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6, 350–372. Carlile, P. (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13, 442–455. Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A. (1990) Absorptive-capacity – a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. Cozijnsen, A., Vrakking, W. & van Ijzerloo, M. (2000) Success and failure of 50 innovation projects in Dutch companies. European Journal of Innovation Management, 3, 150–159. Crossan, M. & Berdrow, I. (2003) Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1087–1105. DeFillippi, R. & Arthur, M.B. (1998) Paradox in projectbased enterprise: the case of film making. California Management Review, 40, 125–139. Dillman, D.A. (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Wiley, New York, NY, USA. Edelman, L.F. (2000) Facilitators and impediments to the internal transfer of team-embodied competencies in firms operating in dynamic environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, MA, USA. Eisenhardt, K. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532– 550. Fulwiler, T. (1987) The Journal of Book. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH, USA. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. Hansen, M. (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 92– 111. von Hippel, E. (1994) Sticky information and the locus of problem solving. Implications for Innovation Management Science, 40, 429–439. Irani, Z. & Love, P.E.D. (2000) The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 161–177. Jick, T.D. (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods. Triangulation in Action Administration Science Quarterly, 24, 602–610. Kearns, G.S. (2004) A multi-objective, multi-criteria approach for evaluating IT investments: results from two case studies. Information Resources Management Journal, 17, 37–62. Keegan, A. & Turner, R. (2001) Quantity versus quality in project-based learning practices. Management Learning, 32, 77–98. Kline, R.B. (1998) Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling. Guildford, New York, NY, USA. Kock, N. & McQueen, R. (1998) Groupware support as a moderator of interdepartmental knowledge communication in process improvement groups: an action research study. Information Systems Journal, 8, 183–198. Kotnour, T. (1999) A learning framework for project management. Project Management Journal, 30, 32–38. Leonard-Barton, D. (1990) The intraorganizational environment: point-to-point versus diffusion. In: Technology Transfer: A Communication Perspective, Williams, F. & Gibson, D.V. (eds), pp. 43–62. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. Locke, K.D. (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. Lyytinen, K. & Robey, D. (1999) Learning failure in information systems development. Information Systems Journal, 9, 85–101. March, J. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–86. Matta, N. & Ashkenas, R. (2003) Why good projects fail anyway. Harvard Business Review, 81, 109–115. Newell, S., Edelman, L., Scarbrough, H., Swan, J. & Bresnen, M. (2003) ‘Best practice’ development and transfer in the NHS: the importance of process as well as product knowledge. Journal of Health Services Management, 16, 1–12. Orlikowski, W. (1993) CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17, 309–324. Prencipe, A. & Tell, F. (2001) Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30, 1373– 1394. Project Management Institute (2002) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. PMI Publishing Division, Sylva, NC, USA. Raelin, J.A. (2001) Public reflection as the basis of learning. Management Learning, 32, 11–30. Salas, E., Burke, C.S. & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2000) Teamwork: emerging principles. International Journal of Management Review, 2, 339–356. Scarbrough, H. & Swan, J. (2001) Explaining the diffusion of knowledge management: the role of fashion. British Journal of Management, 12, 3–12. Schindler, M. & Eppler, M. (2003) Harvesting project knowledge: a review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 219–229. Senge, P. (1990) The Fifth Discipline. Bantam Doubleday Dell, New York, NY, USA. Sharp, D. (2003) Knowledge management today. Challenges and Opportunities Information Systems Management, 20, 32–37. Star, S. (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Huhns M. & Glasser L. (eds), pp. 37–54. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, USA. Szulanski, G. (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43. Teece, D., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533. Van der Gerben, P., van Beers, C. & Kleinknecht, A. (2002) Success and failure of innovation: a literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 309–338. Von Zedtwitz, M. (2002) Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R & D. R & D Management, 32, 255–268. Williamson, A. & Iliopoulos, C. (2001) The learning organization information system: looking for the next generation. Information Systems Journal, 11, 23–41. Winter, S. (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 991–995. Wolcott, H. (1994) Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis and Interpretation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. Yin, R. (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Revised). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. Zollo, M. & Winter, S. (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 339–351.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/29228

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item