Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Structure and NMR assignment in calcined and as-synthesized forms of AlPO-14 : a combined study by first-principles calculations and high- resolution Al-27-P-31 MAS NMR correlation

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Ashbrook, Sharon E., Cutajar, Marica, Pickard, Chris J., Walton, Richard I. and Wimperis, Stephen. (2008) Structure and NMR assignment in calcined and as-synthesized forms of AlPO-14 : a combined study by first-principles calculations and high- resolution Al-27-P-31 MAS NMR correlation. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol.10 (No.37). pp. 5754-5764. ISSN 1463-9076

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b805681a

Abstract

The high-resolution Al-27 and P-31 NMR spectra of two as-synthesized forms of the microporous aluminophosphate AlPO-14 and the corresponding calcined -dehydrated form were assigned using both "first-principles'' calculations of NMR parameters (GIPAW, as implemented in NMR-CASTEP) and a Al-27-P-31 heteronuclear correlation NMR experiment (MQ-J-HETCOR) that exploits Al-27 multiple-quantum coherences and J couplings to identify Al-O-P linkages. NMR parameters calculated from published AlPO-14 crystal structures, which are derived from powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data, are in poor agreement with experiment and it was necessary to optimize the structure geometry using energy minimization before satisfactory agreement was obtained. Comparison of simulated powder XRD patterns from the experimental and the energy-minimized structures shows that the changes in relative atomic positions in the optimized structure are relatively small and yield only minor adjustments in the Bragg peak intensities. These results indicate that a combination of NMR spectroscopy and first-principles calculation of NMR parameters may soon be considered a generally useful step in the refinement of the structures of microporous materials derived from powder diffraction data.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QD Chemistry
Q Science > QC Physics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Chemistry
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Phosphates, Porous materials -- Structure, Nuclear magnetic resonance, X-rays -- Diffraction, Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Journal or Publication Title: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry
ISSN: 1463-9076
Date: 2008
Volume: Vol.10
Number: No.37
Number of Pages: 11
Page Range: pp. 5754-5764
Identification Number: 10.1039/b805681a
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Funder: Royal Society (Great Britain), Research Councils UK (RCUK), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant number: GR/S96579 (EPSRC)
References: 1 S. T. Wilson, B. M. Lok, C. A. Messina, T. R. Cannan and E. M. Flanigen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 1146. 2 C. Baerlocher, L. B. McCusker and D. H. Olson, Atlas of Zeolite Framework Types, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 6th edn, 2007. 3 B. Zibrowius, U. Lohse and J. Richter-Mendau, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1991, 87, 1433. 4 J. Rocha, J. Klinowski, P. J. Barrie, R. Jelinek and A. Pines, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson., 1992, 1, 217. 5 C. Fernandez, J. P. Amoureux, J. M. Chezeau, L. Delmotte and H. Kessler, Microporous Mater., 1996, 6, 331. 6 C. A. Fyfe, H. M. zu Altenschildesche, K. C. Wong-Moon, H. Grondey and J. M. Chezeau, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson., 1997, 9, 97. 7 J. P. Amoureux, C. Huguenard, F. Engelke and F. Taulelle, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2002, 356, 497. 8 L. Delevoye, C. Fernandez, C. M. Morais, J. P. Amoureux, V. Montouillout and J. Rocha, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson., 2002, 22, 501. 9 J.W.Wiench and M. Pruski, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson., 2004, 26, 51. 10 J. W. Wiench, G. Tricot, L. Delevoye, J. Trebosc, J. Frye, L. Montagne, J. P. Amoureux and M. Pruski, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 144. 11 J. P. Amoureux, J. Trebosc, J. Wiench and M. Pruski, J. Magn. Reson., 2007, 184, 1. 12 L. Frydman and J. S. Harwood, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 5367. 13 S. P. Brown and S. Wimperis, J. Magn. Reson., 1997, 128, 42. 14 Z. Gan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 3242. 15 S. E. Ashbrook and S. Wimperis, J. Magn. Reson., 2002, 156, 269. 16 S. E. Ashbrook and S. Wimperis, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 2004, 45, 53. 17 S. E. Ashbrook, S. Antonijevic, A. J. Berry and S. Wimperis, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2002, 364, 634. 18 S. Antonijevic, S. E. Ashbrook, S. Biedasek, R. I. Walton, S. Wimperis and H. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 8054. 19 C. J. Pickard and F. Mauri, Phys. Rev. B, 2001, 63, 245101. 20 M. D. Segall, P. J. D. Lindan, M. J. Probert, C. J. Pickard, P. J. Hasnip, S. J. Clark and M. C. Payne, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 2002, 14, 2717. 21 R. W. Broach, S. T. Wilson and R. M. Kirchner, in Proceedings of the 12th International Zeolite Conference, ed. M. M. J. Treacy, B. C. Marcus, M. E. Bisher and J. B. Higgins, Materials Research Society, Warrendale, 1999, vol. 3, p. 1715. 22 R. W. Broach, S. T. Wilson and R. M. Kirchner, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2003, 57, 211. 23 G. Bodenhausen, H. Kogler and R. R. Ernst, J. Magn. Reson., 1984, 58, 370. 24 S. P. Brown, S. J. Heyes and S. Wimperis, J. Magn. Reson. A, 1996, 119, 280. 25 Z. Gan and H. T. Kwak, J. Magn. Reson., 2004, 168, 346. 26 T. J. Ball and S. Wimperis, J. Magn. Reson., 2007, 187, 343. 27 D. J. States, R. A. Haberkorn and D. J. Ruben, J. Magn. Reson., 1982, 48, 286. 28 K. J. Pike, R. P. Malde, S. E. Ashbrook, J. McManus and S. Wimperis, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson., 2000, 16, 203. 29 G. A. Morris, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 428. 30 S. J. Clark, M. D. Segall, C. J. Pickard, P. J. Hasnip, M. J. Probert, K. Refson and M. C. Payne, Z. Kristallogr., 2005, 220, 567. 31 J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865. 32 J. R. Yates, C. J. Pickard and F. Mauri, Phys. Rev. B, 2007, 76, 024401. 33 J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, ‘‘FullProf: A Program, for Rietveld Refinement and Pattern Matching Analysis’’, Abstracts of the Satellite Meeting on Powder Diffraction of the XV Congress of the IUCr, Toulouse, France, 1990, p. 127. 34 R. J. Hill and R. X. Fischer, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1990, 23, 462. 35 L. Delevoye, J. Trebosc, Z. Gan, L. Montagne and J. P. Amoureux, 2007, 186, p. 94. 36 G. Engelhardt and W. Veeman, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1993, 622. 37 D. Mu¨ ller, E. Jahn, G. Ladwig and U. Haubenreisser, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1984, 109, 332. 5764
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/29324

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us