Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Bounds and robust hedging of the American option

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Neuberger, Anthony (2009) Bounds and robust hedging of the American option. Working Paper. Warwick Business School, Coventry.

[img] PDF
WRAP_Neuberger_Bounds_Robust.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (376Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/subjects/fin...

Abstract

The value of an American option depends on the information that the holder will acquire over the option’s life. Much of the literature makes restrictive assumptions about information revelation – for example that the underlying price process is Markov. With a richer information structure, the American feature becomes more valuable. This paper identifies the least upper bound on the price of an American option, placing no assumptions on the information structure. It shows that the American premium in standard models is a small fraction of its upper bound, and shows what features make the American feature most valuable. The bounds can be tightened by excluding implausible processes, and these bounds are enforced by a hedging strategy that is robust to model error.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Financial Econometrics Research Centre
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Finance Group
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Options (Finance) -- United States, Functions of bounded variation, Markov processes, Options (Finance) -- Mathematical models
Publisher: Warwick Business School
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: August 2009
Number of Pages: 40
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Andersen, L., and J. Andreasen, 2001, “Factor Dependence of Bermudan Swaptions: fact or fiction?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 62(1), 3–37. Andersen, L., and M. Broadie, 2004, “Primal-Dual Simulation Algorithm for Pricing Multidimensional American Options”, Management Science, 50(9), 1222–1234. Avellaneda, M., A. Levy, and A. Paras, 1995, “Pricing and hedging derivative securities in markets with uncertain volatilities”, Applied Mathematical Finance, 2, 73–88. Bernardo, A.E., and O. Ledoit, 2000, “Gain, Loss, and Asset Pricing”, Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 144–172. Britten-Jones, M., and A. Neuberger, 2000, “Option Prices, Implied Price Processes and Stochastic Volatility”, Journal of Finance, 55(2), 839-866. Broadie, M., and J. B. Detemple, 2004, “Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications” , Management Science, 50(9), 1145–1177. Brown, H., Hobson, D. and L.C.G. Rogers, 2001, “Robust Hedging of Barrier Options”, Mathematical Finance, 11, 285–314. Buraschi, A., and F. Corielli, 2005, “Risk management implications of timeinconsistency: Model updating and recalibration of no-arbitrage models”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 29(11), 2883-2907. Cochrane, J. H., and J. Saá-Requejo, 2000, “Beyond Arbitrage: Good-Deal Asset Price Bounds in Incomplete Markets”, Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 79-119. Davis, M. H. A., and D. G. Hobson, 2007, “The Range of Traded Option Prices”, Mathematical Finance, 17(1), 1-14. Derman, E., and I. Kani, 1994, “Riding on a Smile”, Risk, 7, 32-39. Derman, E., D. Ergener, and I. Kani, 1995, “Static Options Replication,” Journal of Derivatives, 2, 78-95. Dupire, B., 1994, “Pricing with a smile”, Risk, 7, 18-20. Green T, C., and S. Figlewski, 1999, “Market Risk and Model Risk for a Financial Institution Writing Options”, Journal of Finance, 54, 1465-1499. Haugh, M., and L. Kogan, 2004, “Pricing American Options: A Duality Approach”, Operations Research, 52(2), 258-270. Heston, S., 1993, “A closed-form solutions for options with stochastic volatility”, Review of Financial Studies, 6, 327–343. . Longstaff, F., P. Santa-Clara and E. Schwartz, 2001, “Throwing away a billion dollars: the cost of suboptimal exercise strategies in the swaption market”, Journal of Financial Economics, 62(1), 39-66. Merton, R. C., 1973, “The Theory of Rational Option Pricing”, Bell Journal of Economics, 4, 141-183. Rogers, L. C. G., 2002, “Monte Carlo Valuation of American options”, Mathematical Finance, 12 (3), 271-286. Rumsfeld, D., 2002, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld Press Conference at NATO Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium, 6 June 2002, http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/ transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3490 Svenstrup, M., 2005, “On the suboptimality of single-factor exercise strategies for Bermudan swaptions”, Journal of Financial Economics, 78(3), 651-684.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2936

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us