Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Exploring the remuneration ‘black box’: establishing an organizational learning insight into changing remuneration committee ‘social worlds’

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Rowe, Andrew D. and Liu, Lisa Shifei (2010) Exploring the remuneration ‘black box’: establishing an organizational learning insight into changing remuneration committee ‘social worlds’. Working Paper. Warwick Business School, Coventry.

[img] PDF
WRAP_Liu_Exploring_renumeration.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (286Kb)
Official URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id...

Abstract

Current executive compensation research posits a need to extend analysis beyond principalagent theory in order to explore the complex social influences and processes implicated in Remuneration Committee (RemCo) decision-making (e.g. Bender, 2007; Kakabadse et al, 2006; Main et al., 2007), particularly given the current uproar surrounding reported levels and structuring of executive remuneration. We respond to this international need by highlighting how innovative organizational learning theorizing can be integrated into further investigations of the remuneration ‘Black Box’, in order to focus attention upon the nuances of what and how organizational learning takes place in the remuneration process. Additionally, we note the importance of investigating the main actors and particularly their performance of complex roles within their rapidly evolving ‘social worlds’. By exploring the organizational learning phenomena implicated in executive remuneration, we argue that practitioners, regulatory bodies etc. can appreciate further the implications of their respective decision-making.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Accounting, Markets & Organisations
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Organizational learning -- Research, Wage bargaining -- Research, Knowledge management, Decision making
Publisher: Warwick Business School
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: 19 February 2010
Number of Pages: 26
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Adams, R. and Ferreira, D. (2007) ‘A Theory of Friendly Boards’, Journal of Finance 62: 217-250. Adams, R. and Ferreira, D. (2009) ‘Strong Managers, Weak Boards?’ SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1409833&rec=1&srcabs=1421549 date accessed 22nd January 2010. Antonacopoulou, E. (2001) ‘The Paradoxical Nature of the Relationship between Training and Learning’, Journal of Management Studies 38(3): 327-350. Antonacopoulou, E. (2006) ‘Learning-in-Practise: The Social Complexity of Learning in Working Life’, AIM Working Paper Series: 033-February-2006. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Baker, G. P., Jensen, M. C., and Murphy, K. J. (1988) ‘Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs. Theory’, Journal of Finance 43(3): 593-616 Bender, R. (2007) ‘Onwards and Upwards: Why Companies Change Their Executive Remuneration Schemes, and Why This Leads to Increases In Pay’, Corporate Governance-An International Review 15(5): 709-723. Boland R. J. Jr. and Tenkasi, R. V. (1995) ‘Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing’, Organizational Science 6(4): 350–72. Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1994), “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation”, in H. Tsoukas (ed.) New Thinking in Organizational Behaviour: From Social Engineering to Reflective Action. p p165-87. Butterworth/Heinemann: Oxford. Burgoyne, J. (1995) ‘Learning From Experience: From Individual Discovery to Meta- Dialogue via the Evolution of Transitional Myths’, Personnel Review 24(6): 61-72. Carter, M. and Zamora, V. (2009) ‘Shareholder Remuneration Votes and CEO Compensation Design’, SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1004061. Accessed 4th January 2010 Contu, A. and Willmott, H. (2003) ‘Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory’, Organization Science 14(3):283-296. Cuijpers, R. and Buijink, W. (2005) ‘Voluntary Adoption of Non-local GAAP in the European Union: A Study of Determinants and Consequences’, European Accounting Review 14(3): 487 - 524 Dulewick, V. and Herbert, P. (2008) ‘Current practice of FTSE 350 Boards concerning the appointment, evaluation and development of directors, boards and committees post the Combined Code’, International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4(1): 99 – 115. Dunne, P. and Morris, G. (2006) The Non-executive Director's Handbook, International Financial Publishing Ltd. Elkjaer, B. (2004) ‘Organizational Learning: “The Third Way”’, Management Learning 35(4): 419-434. Ezzamel, M. and Watson, R. (1997) ‘Wearing Two Hats: The Conflicting Control and Management Roles of Non-Executive Directors’, in K. Keasey, S. Thompson and M. Wright (ed.) Corporate Governance, pp. 54-79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. Ferri, F. and Maber, D. (2008) ‘Say on Pay Vote and CEO Compensation: Evidence from the U’, Working Paper. http://efmaefm.org/0EFMSYMPOSIUM/CGC%202009/papers/ Ferri.pdf, accessed 10th January 2010. Fox, S. (2000) ‘Communities of Practice, Foucault and Actor-Network Theory’, Journal of Management Studies 37(6): 853-867. Froud, J. Leaver, A. Tampubolon, G. and Williams, K. (2008) ‘Everything for sale: how nonexecutive directors make a difference’, Sociological Review 56(1): 162 -186 Garratt, B. (2003) ‘Building and developing high performance boards’, 6th International Conference on Corporate Governance and Board Leadership, Henley Management College. Geiger, D. (2009) ‘Revisiting the Concept of Practice: Toward an Argumentative Understanding of Practicing’, Management Learning Vol. 40(2): 129–144 Gherardi, S. (1999) ‘Learning as Problem-driven or Learning in the Face of Mystery?’ Organization Studies 20 (1): 101–24. Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2002) ‘Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: canon or dissonance?’, Journal of Management Studies 39, 4. Greenbury. R. (1995). Report on Directors’ Pay. London: Gee Publishing Ltd. Higgs, D. (2003) Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors, DTI, London. Huysman, M. and Elkjaer, B. (2006) ‘Organizations as arenas of social worlds; towards an alternative perspective on organizational learning?’, paper presented at OLKC Conference at the University of Warwick, Coventry 20-26 March. International Accounting Standard Board (2004) ‘Share-based Payment’, International Financial Reporting Standards 2. Issacs, W. (1993) ‘Taking Flight: Dialogue, Collective Thinking & Organizational Learning’, Organizational Dynamics 22(2): 24-39. Jensen, Michael C., Murphy, Kevin J. and Wruck, E. (2004) ‘'Remuneration: Where We've Been, How We Got to Here, What Are the Problems, and How to Fix them', ECGI-Finance Working Paper No. 44/2004 Jones, O. and Macpherson, A. (2006) ‘Inter-Organizational Learning and Strategic Renewal in SMEs: Extending the 4I Framework’, Long Range Planning 39: 155-175. Kakabadse, A. Kakabadse, N. and Barratt, R. (2006) ‘Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO): that Sacred and Secret Relationship’, Journal of Management Development 25(2): 134-150. Kang, E. and Tan, B. (2008) ‘Accounting Choices and Director Interlocks: A Social Network Approach to the Voluntary Expensing of Stock Option Grants’ Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(9-10): 1079-1102. Kovacevic, S. (2009) ‘Disclosed: An exploration of board remuneration committee challenges’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 47(2): 201-218. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lincoln, D. Young, D. Wilson, T. and Whiteley, P. (2006) ‘The Role of the Board Remuneration Committee. How Remcos function in determining top executive pay’. Parc: Performance and Reward Centre, Research Report (PARC 2006) March. Liu, L. S., Chan, A. L-C. and Jiang, W. (2010) ‘The Impact of Accounting for Share-based Payment on Executive Compensation Plans: The Case of FTSE 350 Firms’, Unpublished working paper, Warwick Business School. Long, T. (2008) ‘Diving for pearls: the importance of Board induction and re-induction’, International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4(1): 40-50. Main, B. (2006) ‘The ABI Guidelines for Share-based Incentive Schemes: Setting the Hurdle Too High’, Accounting and Business Research, 36 (3): 191-205. Main, B. Jackson, C. Pymm, J and Wright, V. (2007) ‘Questioning the Remuneration Committee Process’, Working Paper 21 February 2007 McNulty T., Roberts J., and Stiles P. (2005) ‘Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the Non-Executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom’. British Journal of Management, 16 (Special Issue): S5-S26 Myerson, G. (1994) Rhetoric, Reason and Society: Rationality as Dialogue. London: Sage. Neck, C. and Manz, C. (1994) ‘From Groupthink to Teamthink: Toward the Creation of Constructive Thought Patterns in Self-Managing Work Teams’, Human Relations 47(8): 9292-952. Nicolini, D. and Meznar, M. (1995) ‘The Social Construction of Organizational Learning – Conceptual and Practical Issues in the Field’, Human Relations, 48(7): 727-746. O’Donnell, D and O’Regan, P. (2006) ‘Exploring Critical Dialogue in the Boardroom: Getting Inside the Empirical Black Box of Board Dynamics’, Working Paper, March 2006. Ogden, S. and Watson, R. (2008) ‘Executive Pay and the Search for Legitimacy: An Investigation into How UK Remuneration Committees Use Corporate Performance Comparisons in Long-term Incentive Pay Decisions’, Human Relations 61(5): 711-739 O’Reilly, C. and Main, B. (2007) ‘Setting the CEO’s Pay: It’s More Than Simple Economics’, Organizational Dynamics 36(1): 1-12 Orlikowski, W.J. (2002) ‘Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing’, Organization Science 13 (3): 249-273. Oswick, C. Anthony, P. Keenoy, T. Mangham, I. Grant, D. (2000) ‘A Dialogic Analysis of Organizational Learning’, Journal of Management Studies 37(6): 887-902 Pass, C. (2006) ‘The Revised Combined Code and Corporate Governance: An Empirical Survey of 50 Large UK Companies’, Working Paper No. 06/12, Bradford University School of Management. Pedler, M., Boydell, T. and Burgoyne, J. (1989) ‘Towards the Learning Company’, Management Education and Development 20(1): 1-8. Perkins, S.J. and Hendry C. (2005) ‘Ordering top pay: interpreting the signals’, Journal of Management Studies 42(7): 1443-1468 Pettigrew, A. M. (1992) ‘On studying managerial elites’, Strategic Management Journal 13: 163–182. Pye, A. and Pettigrew, A. (2005) ‘Studying Board Context, Process and Dynamics: Some Challenges for the Future’, British Journal of Management 16(1): 27-38. Rifkin, W. and Fulop, L. (1997) ‘A review and case study on learning organizations’, The Learning Organization 4(4): 135 – 148. Roberts, J. (2001) ‘Trust and Control in Anglo-American systems of corporate governance: The individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability’, Human Relations 54(12): 1547-1572. Roberts, J. (2006) ‘Limits to Communities of Practice’, Journal of Management Studies 43(3): 623-639. Rowe, A. and Smart, P. (2008) ‘Making Dance: Learning & Designing Issues in Biotechnology Networks’, Aesthesis: An International Journal of Art and Aesthetics in Management and Organizational Life 2(3): 75-84. Saka-Helmhout, A. (2010) ‘Organizational learning as a situated routine-based activity in international settings’, Journal of World Business 45(1):41-48. Sandberg J. (2000) ‘Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach’ Harvard Business Review 43(1): 9-25 Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books. Senge P. (1992), The Fifth Discipline. New York: Doubleday. Senge, P. Kleiner, A. Roberts, C. Ross, R. Roth, G. and Smith, B. (1999) The Dance of Change: The Challenges of Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations. A Fifth Discipline Resource. London: Nicholas Brearley. Sfard, A. (1998) ‘On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One’ Educational Researcher 27(2): 4-13 Singh, V. (2007) ‘Ethnic diversity on top corporate boards: a resource dependency perspective’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management 18(12): 2128-2146. Spira, L. F. (2002) The Audit Committee: Performing Corporate Governance. Norwell: Kluwer. Spira, L.F. and Bender, R. (2004) ‘Compare and Contrast: perspectives on board committees’ Corporate Governance 12 (4): 489-499. Swan, J and Scarbrough, H. (2005) ‘The politics of networked innovation’, Human Relations 58(7): 913–943 Vince, R. and Saleem, T. (2004) ‘The Impact of Caution and Blame on Organizational Learning’, Management Learning 35(2): 133-154. Vince, R. (2002) ‘Organizing Reflection’, Management Learning 33(1): 63–78. Walker (2009) ‘A review of corporate governance in UK banks and other financial industry entities: Final recommendations’, HM Treasury Report Published 26 November 2009 Watkins, K. and Marsick, V. (2001) ‘Informal and Incidental Learning’, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89. Wenger, E. (2000) ‘Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems’, Organization 7(2): 225-246. Westphal, J., Seidel, M. and Stewart, K. (2001) ‘Second-Order Imitation: Uncovering Latent Effects of Board Network Ties’, Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 717-747.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2938

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us