Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Electrical performance evaluation of low-concentrating non-imaging photovoltaic concentrator

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Mallick, Tapas K. and Eames, Philip C.. (2008) Electrical performance evaluation of low-concentrating non-imaging photovoltaic concentrator. Progress in Photovoltaics, Volume 16 (Number 5). pp. 389-398. ISSN 1062-7995

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.819

Abstract

Second generation prototype photovoltaic facades of reduced costs incorporating devices with optically concentrating elements (PRIDE) incorporate 6 mm wide 'Saturn' solar cells at the absorber of the dielectric concentrator. The concentrators were made using injection moulding technique with potential to manufacture in large-scale applications. Four different concentrator panels have been experimentally verified at outdoors to identify the non-identical current-voltage (I-V) curves. The I-V curve, fill factor and solar to electrical conversion efficiency of four PRIDE concentrator modules have been evaluated from the 24 manufactured in the 'IDEOCONTE' project. The maximum solar to electrical conversion efficiency and the fill factor of the PRIDE concentrator were 9.1 and 70%, respectively. The mismatch loss of the 'unit concentrators' has been identified that occurred due to the lack of bonding between the concentrator unit and the solar cell and the rear glass. The average power concentration ratio of PRIDE concentrators manufactured by the improved method was 2.10 compared to a similar non-concentrating panel and the optical efficiency of the PRIDE system was 83%. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QC Physics
T Technology > TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Engineering
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Photovoltaic power generation
Journal or Publication Title: Progress in Photovoltaics
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISSN: 1062-7995
Date: August 2008
Volume: Volume 16
Number: Number 5
Number of Pages: 10
Page Range: pp. 389-398
Identification Number: 10.1002/pip.819
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: European Commission (EC)
Grant number: ENK5-CT-2002-00617 (EC)
References: 1. Zacharopoulos A, Eames PC, McLarnon D, Norton B. Linear dielectric non-imaging concentrating covers for PV integrated building fac¸ades. Solar Energy 2000; 68: 439–452. 2. Morilla MC, Fernandez JM, Anto´n I, Pacho´n D, Sala G. Buried contact cell design optimisation for concentration system. 20th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Spain, 2005; 1149–1151. 3. Mallick TK, Eames PC. Design and fabrication of low concentrating second generation pride concentrator. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2007; 91: 597–608. 4. Eames PC, Smyth M, Norton B. The experimental validation of a comprehensive unified model for optics and heat transfer in line-axis solar energy systems. Solar Energy 2001; 71: 121–133. 5. Mallick TK, Eames PC, Norton B. Using air flow to alleviate temperature elevations in solar cells within asymmetric compound parabolic concentrators. Solar Energy 2007; 81: 173–184. 6. Mallick TK, Eames PC, Norton B. Non-concentrating and asymmetric compound parabolic concentrating building fac¸ade integrated photovoltaics: an experimental comparison. Solar Energy 2006; 80(7): 834– 849. 7. Mallick TK, Eames PC. ICSC-4, Optical performance predictions for a high concentration point focus photovoltaic system. International Conference on Solar Concentrators-4, Spain, 2007. 8. Topicˇ M, Brecl K, Sites J. Effective efficiency of PV modules under field conditions. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2007; 15: 19–26. 9. Duffie JA, Beckman WA. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. John Wiley & Sons: New York, New Jersey, USA, 1991. 10. Ulbrich Ireland, Westlink Commercial Park, Galway, Ireland.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/29495

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us