The Library

Crossing the interdisciplinary divide : political science and biological science

Tools

Greaves, Justin and Grant, Wyn. (2010) Crossing the interdisciplinary divide : political science and biological science. Political Studies, Vol.58 (No.2). pp. 320-339. ISSN 0032-3217

	PDF (Article Main Text) WRAP_Greaves_0381539-pais-210310-crossing_the_interdisciplinary_divide_complete.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (369Kb)
	PDF (Blackwell policy) WRAP_Greaves_Elf.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (33Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00828.x

Abstract

This article argues that interdisciplinary collaboration can offer significant intellectual gains to political science in terms of methodological insights, questioning received assumptions and providing new perspectives on subject fields. Collaboration with natural scientists has been less common than collaboration with social scientists, but can be intellectually more rewarding. Interdisciplinary work with biological scientists can be especially valuable given the history of links between the two subjects and the similarity of some of the methodological challenges faced. The authors have been involved in two projects with biological scientists and this has led them critically to explore issues relating to the philosophy of science, in particular the similarities and differences between social and natural science, focusing on three issues: the problem of agency, the experimental research design and the individualistic fallacy. It is argued that interdisciplinary research can be fostered through shared understandings of what constitutes 'justified beliefs'. Political science can help natural scientists to understand a more sophisticated understanding of the policy process. Such research brings a number of practical challenges and the authors explain how they have sought to overcome them.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	J Political Science > JA Political science (General) Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Interdisciplinary research -- Great Britain, Biology -- Research, Political science -- Research, Policy networks
Journal or Publication Title:	Political Studies
Publisher:	Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN:	0032-3217
Date:	March 2010
Volume:	Vol.58
Number:	No.2
Page Range:	pp. 320-339
Identification Number:	10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00828.x
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Alker, H. Jr. (1965) Mathematics and Politics. New York: the Macmillan Company. Ashworth, L.M. (2009) „Interdisciplinarity and international relations‟, European Political Science, 8 (1), 16-25. Axelrod, R. (2008) „Political Science and Beyond: Presidential Address to the American Poliical Science Association‟, Perspectives on Politics, 6 (1), 3-9. Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Blyth, M. (2002) „Institutions and Ideas‟, in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds), Theory and Methods in Political Science (2nd edition). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 292-310. Boari, M. (2005) „Biology and Political Science. Foundational Issues of Political Biology. Working Paper‟. Available at http://econtent.essec.fr/mediaBank/Research/Entrepot-doc/Papers/m.boari/Dr_internet_05006.pdf [accessed 03/02/2009). Bracken, L.J. and Oughton, E.A. (2006) „”What do you mean?”‟ The importance of language in interdisciplinary research‟, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS 31, 371-82. Burnham, P., Gilland Lutz, K., Grant, W. and Layton-Henry, Z. (2008) Research Methods in Politics (2nd edition). Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Chandler, D. and Grant, W. . (2007) „Working Together Across Disciplines: Challenges for the Natural and Social Sciences‟. British Association for the Advancement of Science, Festival of Science, York. Available from: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/biopesticides/papers/york_grant_chandler.ppt [accessed 24/07/2009). Cohen, J and Medley, G. (2005) Stop Working and Start Thinking: A Guide to Becoming a Scientist (2nd edition). Abindon: Taylor & Francis. Collins, H., Evans, R, and Gorman, M. (2007) „Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise‟, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 38 (4), 657-666. Cook, T. and Campbell, D. (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis for Field Settings. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin. Druckman, J, Green, P., Kuklinski, J. and Lupia, A. (2006) „The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Research‟, American Political Science Review, 100 (4), 627-635. ESRC (2007) International Benchmarking Review of UK Politics and International Studies ESRC/PSA/BISA. ESRC (2009) ESRC Strategic Plan 2009-2014: Delivering Impact Through Social Science. ESRC. Available from: http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/strategicplan [accessed 29/07/2009]. Fowler, J and Schreiber, D. (2008) „Biology, Politics and the Emerging Science of Human Nature‟, Science, 322 (7th Nov), 912-914. Grant, W. (2010) „Intractable Policy Failure: the Case of Bovine TB and Badgers‟, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, forthcoming. Greaves, J. (2009) „Biopesticides, Regulatory Innovation and the Regulatory State‟, Public Policy and Administration, Vol 24 (3), 245-264. Greaves, J. and Grant, W. (2010) „Underperforming Policy Networks: the Biopesticides Network in the UK‟, British Politics, forthcoming. Griffin, G., Medhurst, P. and Green, T. (2006) Interdisciplinarity in Interdisciplinary Research Programmes in the UK. Available at http://www.york.ac.uk/res/researchintegration/Interdisciplinarity_UK.pdf [accessed 14/01/2009] Harvey, D. (2006) „RELU Special Issue. Editorial Reflections, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 27 (2), 329-326. Hay, C. (2002) Political Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Hayward, J. (1999) „British Approaches to Politics: the Dawn of a Self-Deprecating Discipline‟, in J. Hayward, B. Barry and A. Brown (eds), The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-35. Hodgson, G.M. (2007) „Meanings of Methodological Individualism‟, Journal of Economic Methodology, 14 (2), 211-26. Johnston, R. (2009) „Where There are Data – Quantifying the Unquantifiable‟, Political Studies Review, 7 (1), 50-62. Keating, M. „Putting European Political Science Back Together Again‟. European Political Science Review, 1 (2), 297-316. Kelly, J. (2009) „What can Interdisciplinarity Offer to Policy Problems? Understanding the Public Policy of Obesity‟, European Political Science, 8 (1), 47-56. King, G. Keohane, R and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, N.J, Princeton University Press. Kneale, W. (1949) Probability and Induction. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Lawton, J.H. (2007) „Ecology, politics and policy‟, Journal of Applied Ecology, 44 (3), 465-74. Lewis, D. (1986) Philosophical Papers (Vol 2) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lijphart, A. (1971) „Comparative Politics and the Comparative Methods‟, American Political Science Review, Vol. 65 (3), 682-93. Lowe, P. (2008) „The Rural North: Landscapes of Endeavour and Enquiry‟. The 2008 Cameron-Gifford Lecture. Lowe, P. and Phillipson, J. (2006) „Reflexive Interdisciplinary Research: The Making of a Research Programme on the Rural Economy and Land Use‟, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57 (2), 165-84. Lowe, P. Phillipson, J and Lee, R. (2008) „Socio-Economic Innovation for Sustainable Food Chains: Roles for Social Science‟, Trends in Food Science and Technology, 19 (5), 226-233. Lowell, A.L. (1910) „The Physiology of Politics‟, American Political Science Review, 4 (Feb), 1-15. Lucas, J. (1991) The Concept of Probability. Oxford: Clarendon Press McIntyre, L.J. (2005) Need to Know: Social Science Research Methods. New York: McGraw Hill. Mackenzie, W.J.M. (1967) Politics and Social Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin. McKenzie, K. (2007) „Comments on Moran‟s “Interdisciplinarity and Political Science”‟, Politics 27 (2), 119-122. Marzano, M., Carss, D. N. & Bell, S. (2006). „Working to make interdisciplinarity work: investing in communication and interpersonal relationships‟ Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57 (2), 185 – 197. Merton (1967) On Theoretical Sociology. New York: Free Press. Moran, M. (2006) „Interdisciplinarity and Political Science‟, Politics 26 (2), 73-83. Morton, R. and Williams, K. (2008) „Experimentation in Political Science‟, in J. Box-Steffenmeiser, D. Colier and H Brady (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 339-356. Moses, J. and Knutsen, T. (2007) Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Newell, J.L. and Bull, M.J. (2009) „Editorial: Truth, Conventional Wisdoms and Interdisciplinarity in Political Science‟, European Political Science, 8 (1), 1-3. Oren, I. (2006) „Can Political Science Emulate the Natural Sciences? The Problem of Self-Refuting Analysis‟, Polity, 38 (1), 72-100. Peters, G.P. (1999) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’ London: Pinter. Phillipson, J. and Lowe, P. (2006) „Special Issue Guest Editorial: the Scoping of an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda‟, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57 (2), 163-164. Pierce, R. (2008) Research Methods in Politics: a Practical Guide. London: SAGE. Pigliucci, M. (2009) „Strong Inference and the Distinction Between Soft and Hard Science‟. (Parts I and II). Available from: http://www.scientificblogging.com/rationally_speaking/strong_inference_and_distinction_between_soft_and_hard_science [accessed 13/07/2009]. Popper, K. (2002) Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography (Routledge Classics, 2nd Edition). London: Routledge. Richards, D. (2009) „Symposium on Assessing Research Quality: Preface, Political Studies Review, 7 (1), 1-2. Russell, A (2009) „Retaining the Peers: How Peer Review Triumphs Over League Tables and Faulty Accounting in the Assessment of Political Science Research‟, Political Studies Review, 7, (1), 63-72. Scruton, R. (2004) Modern Philosophy: an Introduction and Survey. London: Pimlico. Segal, R. „Crossing Borders Can Lead to Gold – But So Can Digging Deep‟, in Times Higher Education, 18 June 2009. Available from: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=407028&c=1 [accessed 01/07/2009]. Shadish, W., Cook, T., and Campbell, D. (2002) Experimental and Quazi-Experimental Designs for Generalised Causal Inference. Bolton: Houghton Mifflin. Smith, M. (2007) „A Tale of two Charlies: Political science, History, and Civic Reform, 1890-1940‟, in R. Adcock, M. Bevir and S Stimson (eds) Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges Since 1880. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 118-136. Smolin, L. (2006) The Trouble with Physics. London: Penguin. Stableford, B. (2006) Science Fact and Science Fiction. New York: Routledge. Available from: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=uefwmdROKTAC&dq=oedipus+effect+popper&source=gbs_navlinks_s [accessed 8/07/2008] Warleigh-Lack, A. and Cini, M. (2008) „Interdisciplinarity and the Study of Politics‟, European Political Science, 8 (1), 4-15. Wellington, J. and Szczerbinski, M. (2007) Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Trowbridge, Wiltshire: Cromwell Press.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2974