Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Photography and causation: responding to Scruton's scepticism

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Phillips, Dawn M. (2009) Photography and causation: responding to Scruton's scepticism. British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol.49 (No.4). pp. 327-340. doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayp036 ISSN 0007-0904.

[img] PDF
WRAP_Phillips_110410-07_photography_and_causation.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (275Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayp036

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

According to Roger Scruton, it is not possible for photographs to be representational art. Most responses to Scruton's scepticism are versions of the claim that Scruton disregards the extent to which intentionality features in photography; but these cannot force him to give up his notion of the ideal photograph. My approach is to argue that Scruton has misconstrued the role of causation in his discussion of photography. I claim that although Scruton insists that the ideal photograph is defined by its ‘merely causal’ provenance, in fact he fails to take the causal provenance of photographs seriously enough. To replace Scruton's notion of the ideal photograph, I offer a substantive account of the causal provenance of photographs, centred on the distinctive role of ‘the photographic event’. I conclude that, with a proper understanding of the photographic process, we have good reason to re-open the question of photography as a representational art.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BH Aesthetics
T Technology > TR Photography
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Scruton, Roger, Photography, Artistic -- History and criticism, Causation, Aesthetics, Representation (Philosophy)
Journal or Publication Title: British Journal of Aesthetics
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0007-0904
Official Date: October 2009
Dates:
DateEvent
October 2009Published
Volume: Vol.49
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 327-340
DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayp036
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us