Damant, Dominique, Lapierre, Simon, Kouraga, Anne, Fortin, Andree, Hamelin-Brabant, Louise, Lavergne, Chantal and Lessard, Genevieve. (2008) Taking child abuse and mothering into account - Intersectional feminism as an alternative for the study of domestic violence. Affilia, Vol.23 (No.2). pp. 123-133. ISSN 0886-1099

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Feminist scholars have been engaged in an ongoing debate to determine which theoretical perspective offers the best framework for understanding domestic violence, and this debate has been crystallized around two pole positions: radical and postmodern feminism. This article presents a journey throughout the development of a theoretical perspective for the study of domestic violence, child abuse, and mothering. It argues that the intersectional feminist perspective has much to offer these debates and that it constitutes a promising theoretical framework for understanding domestic violence that takes into account issues of child abuse and mothering.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Health and Social Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Child abuse, Family violence, Motherhood
Journal or Publication Title:	Affilia
Publisher:	Sage Publications, Inc.
ISSN:	0886-1099
Date:	2008
Volume:	Vol.23
Number:	No.2
Number of Pages:	11
Page Range:	pp. 123-133
Identification Number:	10.1177/0886109908314321
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
References:	Afshar, H., & Maynard, M. (Eds.). (1994). The dynamics of “race” and gender: Some feminist interventions. London: Taylor & Francis. Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage. Bograd, M. (1988). Introduction. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11-27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Bryson, V. (1999). Patriarchy: A concept too useful to loose? Contemporary Politics, 5, 311-324. Butler, J. (1992). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In J. Butler & J. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 3-21). New York: Routledge. Chase, S. E., & Rogers, M. F. (2001). Mothers and children: Feminist analyses and personal narratives. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Collins, P. H. (2004). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 103-126). New York: Routledge. Crenshaw, K. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299. Davies, L., & Krane, J. (2003). Critical reflections on practice with battered women: Insights from Maya’s story. Atlantis, 28(1), 63-71. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge. Evans, J. (1995). Feminist theory today: An introduction to second-wave feminism. London: Sage. Fawcett, B., & Featherstone, B. (2000). Setting the scene: An appraisal of notions of postmodernism, postmodernity and postmodern feminism. In B. Fawcett, B. Featherstone, J. Fook, & A. Rossiter (Eds.), Practice and research in social work: Postmodern feminist perspectives (pp. 5-23). London: Routledge. Featherstone, B. (1996). Victims or villains? Women who physically abuse their children. In B. Fawcett, B. Featherstone, J. Hearn, & C. Toft (Eds.), Violence and gender relations. Theories and interventions (pp. 178-190). London: Sage. Featherstone, B. (1999). Taking mothering seriously: The implications for child protection. Child and Family Social Work, 4, 43-53. Featherstone, B., & Trinder, L. (1997). Familiar subjects? Domestic violence and child welfare. Child and Family Social Work, 7, 147-159. Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. London: Women’s Press. Glenn, E. N. (1994). Social construction of mothering: A thematic overview. In E. N. Glenn, G. Chang, & L. R. Forcey (Eds.), Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 1-29). New York: Routledge. Harding, S. (Ed.). (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge. Hartsock, N. (1990). Foucault on power: A theory for women? In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 157-175). New York: Routledge. Hoff, L. A. (1988). Collaborative feminist research and the myth of objectivity. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 269-281). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Hollway, W., & Featherstone, B. (Eds.). (1997). Mothering and ambivalence. London: Routledge. hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press. Hughes, C. (2002). Key concepts in feminist theory and research. London: Sage. Jackson, S. (1998). Feminist social theory. In S. Jackson & J. Jones (Eds.), Contemporary feminist theories (pp. 12-33). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press. Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. Kelly, L. (1994). The interconnectedness of domestic violence and child abuse: Challenges for research, policy and practice. In A. Mullender & R. Morley (Eds.), Children living with domestic violence (pp. 43-56). London: Whiting & Birch. Kelly, L., & Lovett, J. (2004). What a waste: An argument for an integrated approach to violence against women. London: Child and Woman Abuse Unit, London Metropolitan University. Krane, J., & Davies, L. (2002). Sisterhood is not enough: The invisibility of mothering in shelter practice with battered women. Affilia, 17, 167-190. Krane, J., Oxman-Martinez, J., & Ducey, K. (2000). Violence against women and ethnoracial minority women: Examining assumptions about ethnicity and “race.” Canadian Ethnic Studies, 32(3), 1-18. Lavergne, C., Jacob, M., & Chamberland, C. (2001, May 15). Contributions féministes à la compréhension des mauvais traitements envers les enfants [Feminist contributions to the understanding of child maltreatment]. Paper presented at Violence envers les femmes et les enfants en contexte familial: Théories explicatives et données empirique, 69e Congrès de l’ACFAS, University of Sherbrooke. Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. Volcano, CA: Volcano Press. Maynard, M. (1994). “Race,” gender and the concept of “difference” in feminist thought. In H. Afshar & M. Maynard (Eds.), The dynamics of “race” and gender: Some feminist interventions (pp. 9-25). London: Taylor & Francis. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771-1800. Millett, K. (1969). Sexual politics. London: Virago. Mosher, J. (1998). Caught in tangled webs of care: Women abused in intimate relationships. In C. Baines, P. Evans, & S. Neysmith (Eds.), Women’s caring: Feminist perspectives on social welfare (pp. 139-159). Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press. Mullender, A., Hague, G., Imam, U., Kelly, L., Malos, E., & Regan, L. (2002). Children’s perspectives on domestic violence. London: Sage. Nicholson, L. J. (Ed.). (1990). Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge. O’Reilly, A. (2004). Introduction. In A. O’Reilly (Ed.), From motherhood to mothering: The legacy of Adrienne Rich’s Of Woman Born (pp. 1-23). Albany: State University of New York Press. Oxman-Martinez, J., Krane, J., Corbin, M. & Loiselle-Léonard, M. (2002). Competing conceptions of conjugal violence: Insights from an intersectional framework. Montreal, Canada: Centre for Applied Family Studies, McGill University. Parker, R. (1997). The production and purpose of maternal ambivalence. In W. Hollway & B. Featherstone (Eds.), Mothering and ambivalence (pp. 17-36). London: Routledge. Radford, J. (1994). History of women’s liberation movements in Britain: A reflective personal history. In B. Griffin, M. Hester, S. Rai, & S. Roseneil (Eds.), Stirring it: Challenges for feminism (pp. 40-58). London: Taylor & Francis. Radford, L., & Hester, M. (2006). Mothering through domestic violence. London: Jessica Kingsley. Radford, J., Kelly L., & Hester, M. (1996). Introduction. In M. Hester, L. Kelly, & J. Radford (Eds.), Women, violence and male power (pp. 1-16). Buckingham, England: Open University Press. Ramazanoglu, C. & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Rich, A. (1976). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. London: Virago Press. Roberts, H. (Ed.). (1981). Doing feminist research. London: Routledge. Scott, J. W. (1992). Experience. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 3-21). New York: Routledge. Sokoloff, N. J., & Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11(1), 38-64. Stark, E. & Flitcraft, A. (1988). Women and children at risk: A feminist perspective on child abuse. International Journal of Health Services, 18, 87-118. Tanesini, A. (1999). An introduction to feminist epistemologies. Oxford, England: Blackwell. Truman, C. (1994). Feminist challenges to traditional research: Have they gone far enough? In B. Humphries & C. Truman (Eds.), Re-thinking social research: Anti-discrimination in research methodology (pp. 21-36). Aldershot, England: Avebury. Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford, England: Blackwell. Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/30138

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item