Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

A study of psychiatrists’ concepts of mental illness

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Harland, Robert T., Antonova, E. (Elena), Owen, Gareth S., Broome, Matthew R., Landau, Sabine, Deeley, Quinton and Murray, Robin, MD, M Phil, MRCP, MRC Psych. (2009) A study of psychiatrists’ concepts of mental illness. Psychological Medicine, Vol.39 (No.6). pp. 967-976. ISSN 0033-2917

[img] PDF
WRAP_Broome_psychiatrist_concepts.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (141Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708004881

Abstract

Background: There are multiple models of mental illness that inform professional and lay understanding. Few studies have formally investigated psychiatrists' attitudes. We aimed to measure how a group of trainee psychiatrists understand familiar mental illnesses in terms of propositions drawn from different models. Method: We used a questionnaire study of a sample of trainees from South London and Maudsley National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust designed to assess attitudes across eight models of mental illness (e.g. biological, psychodynamic) and four psychiatric disorders. Methods for analysing repeated measures and a principal components analysis (PCA) were used. Results: No one model was endorsed by all respondents. Model endorsement varied with disorder. Attitudes to schizophrenia were expressed with the greatest conviction across models. Overall, the ‘biological’ model was the most strongly endorsed. The first three components of the PCA (interpreted as dimensions around which psychiatrists, as a group, understand mental illness) accounted for 56% of the variance. Each main component was classified in terms of its distinctive combination of statements from different models: PC1 33% biological versus non-biological; PC2 12% ‘eclectic’ (combining biological, behavioural, cognitive and spiritual models); and PC3 10% psychodynamic versus sociological. Conclusions: Trainee psychiatrists are most committed to the biological model for schizophrenia, but in general are not exclusively committed to any one model. As a group, they organize their attitudes towards mental illness in terms of a biological/non-biological contrast, an ‘eclectic’ view and a psychodynamic/sociological contrast. Better understanding of how professional group membership influences attitudes may facilitate better multidisciplinary working.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Mental Health and Wellbeing
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Psychiatrists -- Attitudes, Mental health personnel -- Great Britain, Mental illness -- Public opinion -- Great Britain, Questionnaires -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title: Psychological Medicine
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 0033-2917
Date: June 2009
Volume: Vol.39
Number: No.6
Page Range: pp. 967-976
Identification Number: 10.1017/S0033291708004881
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Institute of Social Psychiatry (ISP)
References: Bowker J (1973). The Sense of God: Sociological, Anthropological, and Psychological Approaches to the Origin of the Sense of God. Oxford University Press : Oxford. Brog MA, Guskin KA (1998). Medical students’ judgements of mind and brain in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. Academic Psychiatry 22, 229–235. Broome MR (2007). Taxonomy and ontology in psychiatry : a survey of recent literature. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 13, 303–319. Brown GW, Harris TO (1978). Social Origins of Depression : A Study of Psychiatric Disorder in Women. Tavistock : London. Clare AW (1976). Psychiatry in Dissent : Controversial Issues in Thought and Practice. Tavistock : London. Colombo A, Bendelow G, Fulford B, Williams S (2003). Evaluating the influence of implicit models of mental disorder on processes of shared decision making within community-based multi-disciplinary teams. Social Science and Medicine 56, 1557–1570. Cooper R (2007). Psychiatry and the Philosophy of Science. Acumen: Chesham. Cutting J, Shepherd M (eds) (1987). The Clinical Roots of the Schizophrenia Concept. Cambridge University Press : Cambridge. Deeley Q (2006). The cognitive anthropology of belief. In The Power of Belief (ed. P. Halligan and M. Aylward), pp. 33–54. Oxford University Press : Oxford. Engel GL (1977). The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 196, 129–136. Foucault M (1971). Madness and Civilization : A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Tavistock : London. Gellner E (1985). The Psychoanalytic Movement. Paladin : London. Ghaemi N (2003). The Concepts of Psychiatry : A Pluralistic Approach to the Mind and Mental Illness. The Johns Hopkins University Press : Baltimore. Good B (1995). Medicine, Rationality, and Experience. Cambridge University Press : Cambridge. Horwitz AV (2002). Creating Mental Illness. Chicago University Press : Chicago. Kendler KS (2008). Explanatory models for psychiatric illness. American Journal of Psychiatry 165, 695–702. Kleinman A (1998). The Illness Narratives : Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition. Basic Books: New York. Lewis A (1967). The State of Psychiatry : Essays and Addresses. Routledge & Kegan Paul : London. MacCabe J, O’Daly O, Murray RM, McGuffin P, Wright P (2006). Beyond Nature and Nurture in Psychiatry. Informa Healthcare : Abingdon, Oxon. Meyer A (1957). Psychobiology : A Science of Man (ed. E. E. Winters and A. M. Bowers). Charles C. Thomas: Springfield, IL. Miresco MJ, Kirmayer LJ (2006). The persistence of mind–brain dualism in psychiatric reasoning about clinical scenarios. American Journal of Psychiatry 163, 913–918. NICE (2008). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NHS Guidelines (http://www.nice.org.uk/ Guidance/CG/Published). Sandler S, Dare C, Holder A, Dreher AS (1992). The Patient and the Analyst. Karnac Books: London. Szasz TS (1960). The myth of mental illness. American Psychologist 15, 113–118. Thomas P, Bracken P (2004). Critical psychiatry in practice. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 10, 361–370. Thornicroft GJ (2006). Shunned: Discrimination Against People with Mental Illness. Oxford University Press : Oxford. Toone BK, Murray R, Clare A, Creed F, Smith A (1979). Psychiatrists models of mental illness and their personal backgrounds. Psychological Medicine 9, 165–178. Tyrer P, Steinberg D (2005). Models for Mental Disorder : Conceptual Models in Psychiatry. Wiley : Chichester.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3016

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us