Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Campbell, Neil C., Murray, Elizabeth, Darbyshire, Janet, Emery, Jon, Farmer, Andrew, Griffiths, Frances, Guthrie, Bruce, Lester, Helen, Wilson, Phil and Kinmonth, A.-L. (2007) Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ, Vol.334 . pp. 455-459. doi:10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE ISSN 0959-535X.

[img] PDF
WRAP_Griffiths_complex_interventions.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (210Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Complex interventions are “built up from a number of components, which may act both independently and interdependently.”1 2 Many health service activities should be considered as complex. Evaluating complex interventions can pose a considerable challenge and requires a substantial investment of time. Unless the trials illuminate processes and mechanisms they often fail to provide useful information. If the result is negative, we are left wondering whether the intervention is inherently ineffective (either because the intervention was inadequately developed or because all similar interventions are ineffective), whether it was inadequately applied or applied in an inappropriate context, or whether the trial used an inappropriate design, comparison groups or outcomes. If there is a positive effect, it can be hard to judge how the results of the trial might be applied to a different context (box 1).

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Social Science & Systems in Health (SSSH)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Medical care
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ
Publisher: BMJ Group
ISSN: 0959-535X
Official Date: 3 March 2007
Dates:
DateEvent
3 March 2007Published
Volume: Vol.334
Page Range: pp. 455-459
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us