Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Identifying undiagnosed diabetes: cross-sectional survey of 3.6 million patients' electronic records

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Holt, Tim A., Stables, David, Hippisley-Cox, Julia, O'Hanlon, Shaun and Majeed, Azeem. (2008) Identifying undiagnosed diabetes: cross-sectional survey of 3.6 million patients' electronic records. British Journal of General Practice, Vol.58 (No.548). pp. 192-196. ISSN 0960-1643

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X277302

Abstract

Background Around 1% of the UK population has diabetes that is either undiagnosed or unrecorded on practice disease registers. Aim To estimate the number of people in UK primary care databases with biochemical evidence of undiagnosed diabetes. To develop simple practice-based search techniques to support early recognition of diabetes. Design of study Cross-sectional survey of 3 630 296 electronic records. Setting Four hundred and eighty UK practices contributing to the QRESEARCH database. Method Electronic searches to identify people with no diabetes diagnosis in one of two categories (A and B), using the most recently recorded blood glucose measurement: random blood glucose level >= 11.1 mmol/l or fasting blood glucose level >= 7.0 mmol/l (A); either a random or a fasting blood glucose level >= 7.0 mmol/l (B). An additional outcome measure was the proportion of the., population with at least one blood glucose measurement in the record. Results The number (percentage) identified in category A was 3758 (0.10% of the total population); the number in category B was 32 785 (0.90%). Projected to a practice of 7000 patients, around eight patients have biochemical evidence of undiagnosed diabetes, and 68 have results suggesting the need for further follow-up. One-third of people aged over 40 years without diabetes have a blood glucose measurement in the past 2 years in their record. Conclusion People with possible undiagnosed diabetes are readily identifiable in UK primary care databases through electronic searches using blood glucose data. People with borderline levels, who may benefit from interventions to reduce their risk of progression to diabetes, can also be identified using practice-based software.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: British Journal of General Practice
Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners
ISSN: 0960-1643
Date: March 2008
Volume: Vol.58
Number: No.548
Number of Pages: 5
Page Range: pp. 192-196
Identification Number: 10.3399/bjgp08X277302
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/30238

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us