Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Managing through projects in knowledge-based environments : special issue introduction by the guest editors

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Lampel, Joseph, Scarbrough, Harry, 1955- and Macmillan, Sebastian. (2008) Managing through projects in knowledge-based environments : special issue introduction by the guest editors. Long Range Planning, Vol.41 (No.1). pp. 7-16. ISSN 0024-6301

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2007.11.007

Abstract

Knowledge-based competitive advantage erodes if it is not continually refreshed. Organisations increasingly rely on projects to enhance their knowledge-base through specific project deliverables such as new products and technologies. But, to do this, projects must go beyond the specific deliverables for which they are designed, and also become sites and opportunities for the creation, mobilisation and integration of knowledge. In this article we argue that projects interact with the organisation's knowledge base primarily through three key activities: (a) by mobilising knowledge that is needed to meet project objectives; (b) by creating knowledge within and through the project; and (c) by integrating knowledge during the project. We further argue that these knowledge-related activities take place at multiple levels of the organisation. Specifically, they occur at the interorganisational level when multiple organisations work together, at the intraorganisational level where different functions and business units are called to support and collaborate on projects, at the interproject level where populations of projects share and exchange knowledge, and at the intraproject level where knowledge is bound up with team and leadership dynamics. We use examples from the Special Issue to illustrate different project-related knowledge activities and different organisational levels at which these activities take place. This analysis helps to illuminate the wider range of roles which projects may play in exploiting knowledge within and between firms. A number of practical implications flow from this analysis. We conclude with reflections on the evolution of projects as key sites for improving the competitive performance of the organisation. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Innovation, Knowledge & Organisational Networks Research Unit
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Knowledge economy, Project management, Interorganizational relations
Journal or Publication Title: Long Range Planning
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0024-6301
Date: February 2008
Volume: Vol.41
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 10
Page Range: pp. 7-16
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.lrp.2007.11.007
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
References: 1. B. Chakravarthy, S. Mcevily, Y. Doz and D. Rau, Knowledge management and competitive advantage, Handbook of organizational learning & knowledge management, 305e323 (2003). 2. M. H. Zack, Rethinking the knowledge-based organization, Sloan Management Review 44(4), 67e71 (2003). 3. M. A. Cusumano, Thinking Beyond Lean: How Multi-Project Management is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Other Companies, The Free Press, New York (1998). 4. A. Davies and M. Hobday, The Business of Projects: Managing Innovations in Complex Products and Systems, Cambridge University Press (2005). 5. J. Lampel, The core competencies of effective project execution: the challenge of diversity, International Journal of Project Management 19(8), 471e483 (2001). 6. M. B. Arthur, R. DeFillippi and C. Jones, Project-based learning as the interplay of career and company non-financial capital, Management Learning 32(1), 99e117 (2001). 7. I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford University Press, New York (1995); A. Schulze and M. Hoegl, Knowledge creation in new product development projects, Journal of Management 32(2), 210e236 (2006). 8. R. Grant, Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration, Organization Science 7(4), 375e387 (1996); H. Scarbrough, J. Swan, S. Laurent, M. Bresnen, L. Edelman and S. Newell, Project-Based Learning and the Role of Learning Boundaries, Organization Studies 25(9), 1579e1600 (2004). 9. A. Prencipe and F. Tell, Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms, Research Policy 30, 1373e1394 (2001). 10. B. Wai Fong, R. Yuqing, S. Kiesler and R. Bussjaeger, Expertise and collaboration in the geographically dispersed organization, Organization Science 18(4), 595e612 (2007).11. C. Enberg, L. Lindkvist and F. Tell, Exploring the dynamics of knowledge integration: acting and interacting in project teams, Management Learning 37(2), 143e165 (2006). 12. C. Shepherd and P. K. Ahmed, From product innovation to solutions innovation: a new paradigm for competitive advantage, European Journal of Innovation Management 2, 100e106 (2000). 13. A. Demaid and P. Quintas, Knowledge across cultures in the construction industry: sustainability, innovation and design, Technovation 26(5/6), 603e610 (2006). 14. R. J. DeFillippi and M. B. Arthur, Paradox in project-based enterprise: the case of film making, California Management Review 40(2), 125e139 (1998). 15. G. Szulanski, Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter Special Issue), 27e43 (1996). 16. J. Faulconbridge, Stretching tacit knowledge beyond a local fix? Global spaces of learning in advertising professional service firms, Journal of Economic Geography 6(4), 517e540 (2006). 17. B. Uttal, The lab that ran away from Xerox, Fortune 97e102 (November 28 1983). 18. L. Markus, Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success, Journal of Management Information Systems 18, 57e93 (2001). 19. D. A. Levinthal and J. G. March, The myopia of learning, Strategic Management Journal 14, 95e112 (1993).
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/30261

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us