Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The effect of using a sprung stripper in sheet metal cutting

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Bing, G. J. A. and Wallbank, J.. (2008) The effect of using a sprung stripper in sheet metal cutting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.200 (No.1-3). pp. 176-184. ISSN 0924-0136

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.018

Abstract

Sheet metal cutting with punch and die is one of most fundamental processes in sheet metal presswork, and in many modern tools such as progression tooling a sprung stripper is used to help the punch withdraw from the strip after separation. The vast quantity of practical information which is available about the cutting process does not document whether the use of a spring stripper affects the cutting process. In this work, a tool with a sprung stripper was modified so that the sprung stripper was held back from the strip. Burr height readings were taken before and after the modification, as were electron micrographs of the cut edge. These were compared to determine the effect, if any, that a sprung stripper would have on the proportions of shear and tensile fracture and the burr height formed. When a sprung stripper was used, maximum burr was half as high as without. Process consistency was over twice as good with a sprung stripper. When a sprung stripper was used,, burr was found to protrude into the hole which did not happen otherwise. With a sprung stripper, there were more patches of secondary shear fracture than with no stripper contact. It is suggested that the use of a sprung stripper altered the path of tensile fracture and the amount of drawing in of the strip during cutting, thus altering the burr height and width. (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
T Technology > TS Manufactures
Divisions: Faculty of Science > WMG (Formerly the Warwick Manufacturing Group)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Sheet-metal work, Sheet metal working machinery, Metal-cutting, Blanking (Metal-work)
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Materials Processing Technology
Publisher: Elsevier S.A.
ISSN: 0924-0136
Date: 8 May 2008
Volume: Vol.200
Number: No.1-3
Number of Pages: 9
Page Range: pp. 176-184
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.018
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Samuel Taylor Ltd. (Redditch, UK)
References: American Machinist, 1982. Fundamentals in fine blanking. In: Stocker Jr., W.M., Heiberg, D. (Eds.), Metalforming: Modern Machines, Methods and Tooling for Engineers and Operating Personnel. American Machinist/McGraw-Hill, USA, pp. 80–98. Anon., 1961. Blanking and Piercing—a metallographic study of the mechanism of constrained shear. PERA Report no. 93. Production Engineering Research Association of Great Britain, Melton Mowbray, 1961. ASM, 1988. Blanking and piercing of steel sheet, strip, and plate. In: ASM Metals Handbook – vol 14 – Forming and Forging, 9th ed. ASM, Ohio, pp. 459–468. American Society of Tool and Manufacturing Engineers (ASTME), 1965. Die Design Handbook, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, pp. 4-1–4- 19. Dayton Progress Corporation, 1987. Dayton Progress, Die Clinic—The Tooling. Dayton Progress Corporation. Hambli, R., 2001. Blanking tool wear modeling using the finite element method. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 41, 1815– 1829. Hambli, R., Potiron, A., 2000. Finite element modeling of sheet-metal blanking operations with experimental verification. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 102, 257– 265. Jimma, T., Sekine, F., 1990. On high speed precision blanking of IC lead-frames using a progressive die. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 22, 291–305. Lange, K., 1985. Handbook of Metals Forming. McGraw-Hill, USA, pp. 24.3–24.42. Maeda, T., Nakagawa, T., 1968. Experimental Investigation on Fine Blanking, Scientific Papers of the Institute of Physical and Chemical Research 62, pp. 65–86. Murdoch, J., Barnes, J.A., 1998. Statistical Tables, 4th ed. Macmillan Press, London. Rachik, M., Roelandt, J.M., Maillard, A., 2002. Some phenomenological and computational aspects of sheet metal blanking simulation. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 128, 256–265. Schuler, L., 1966. Metal Forming Handbook, 4th ed. Louis Schuler, Goppingen (Wuertt.). Taupin, E., Breitling, J., Wu, W.T., Altan, T., 1996. Material fracture and burr formation in blanking—results of FEM simulations and comparison with experiments. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 59, 68–78. Tilsley, R., Howard, F., 1958. Recent investigations into the blanking and piercing of sheet materials. In: Conference on Techniques of Engineering Manufacture (Institution of Mechanical Engineers), pp. 41–47. Vaz Jr., M., Bressan, J.D., 2002. A computational approach to blanking processes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 125/126, 206–212.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/30264

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us