Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2006). Doing qualitative field
studies: Positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting,
Organizations and Society, 31(8), 819–841.
Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2007a). Theorizing practice in
management accounting research. In C. S. Chapman, A. G.
Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.). Handbook of management
accounting research (Vol. 1, pp. 299–318). Oxford:
Elsevier Publishing.
Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2007b). Management accounting
as practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1–
2), 1–27.
Ahrens, T., & Dent, J. F. (1998). Accounting and organisations:
Realizing the richness of field research. Journal of Management
Accounting Research, 10, 1–39.
Briers, M., & Chua, W. F. (2001). The role of actor-networks
and boundary objects in management accounting change: A
field study of an implementation of activity-based costing.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(3), 237–269.
Burchell, S., Clubb, C., & Hopwood, A. G. (1985). Accounting
in its social context: Towards a history of value-added in the
United Kingdom. Accounting, Organizations and Society,
10(4), 381–413.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and
organisational analysis. London: Heinemann.
Chua, W. F. (1986). Radical developments in accounting
thought. The Accounting Review, LXI(4), 601–632.
Dent, J. F. (1991). Accounting and organisational cultures: A
field study of the emergence of a new organisational reality.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(8), 705–732.
Denzin, N. K. (1983). Interpretice interactionism. Newbury
Park: Sage.
Dyer, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better
constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to
Eisenhardt. The Academy of Management Review, 16,
613–619.
Headland, T. N. (1990). Introduction: A dialogue between
Kenneth Pike and Marvin Harris. In T. N. Headland, K. L.
Pike, & M. Harris (Eds.), Emics and etics: The insider/
outsider debate (pp. 13–27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hopper, T., & Powell, A. (1985). Making sense of research into
the organizational and social aspects of management
accounting: A review of its underlying assumptions. Journal
of Management Studies, 22(5), 429–465.
Hoskin, K., & Macve, R. (1988). The genesis of accountability:
The West Point connections. Accounting, Organizations and
Society, 13(1), 37–73.
Hoskin, K. W., & Macve, R. H. (1986). Accounting and the
examination: A genealogy of disciplinary power. Accounting,
Organizations and Society, 11(2), 105–136.
Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M.-L., Lukka, K., & Kuorikoski, J. (2008).
Straddling between paradigms: A naturalistic philosophical
case study on interpretive research in management accounting.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2–3),
267–291. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and
engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard
(Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 15–25). Oxford:
Blackwell.
Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1994). Accounting, ‘‘economic
citizenship’’ and the spatial reordering of manufacture.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(1), 15–43.
Pike, K. L. (1954). Emic and etic standpoints for the description
of behavior. In K. L. Pike (Ed.), Language in relation to a
unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Pt. 1
(Preliminary ed.) (pp. 8–28). Glendale, CA: Summer
Institute of Linguistics.
Tomkins, C., & Groves, R. (1983). The everyday accountant
and researching his reality. Accounting, Organizations and
Society, 8(4), 361–374.