Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Innovation persistence : survey and case-study evidence

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Roper, Stephen and Hewitt-Dundas, Nola. (2008) Innovation persistence : survey and case-study evidence. Research Policy, Vol.37 (No.1). pp. 149-162. ISSN 0048-7333

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.005

Abstract

Evidence on the persistence of innovation sheds light on the nature of the innovation process and can guide appropriate policy development. This paper examines innovation persistence in Ireland and Northern Ireland using complementary quantitative and case-study approaches. Panel data derived from innovation surveys is used, and suggests very different results to previous analyses of innovation persistence primarily based on patents data. Product and process innovation are found to exhibit strong general persistence but we find no evidence that persistence is stronger among highly active innovators. Our quantitative evidence is most strongly consistent with a process of cumulative accumulation at plant level. Our case-studies highlight a number of factors which can either interrupt or stimulate this process including market volatility, plants' organisational context and regulatory changes. Notably, however, the balance of influences on product and process innovation persistence differs, with product innovation persistence linked more strongly to strategic factors and process changes more often driven by market pressures. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Centre for Small & Medium-Sized Enterprises
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Organizational change -- Ireland, Organizational change -- Northern Ireland, Creative ability in business -- Case studies, Organizational effectiveness -- Ireland, Organizational effectiveness -- Northern Ireland, Quantitative research
Journal or Publication Title: Research Policy
Publisher: Elsevier BV
ISSN: 0048-7333
Date: February 2008
Volume: Vol.37
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 14
Page Range: pp. 149-162
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.005
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
References: Borch, O.J., Arthur, M.B., 1995. Strategic Networks Among Small Firms—implications for strategy research methodology. Journal of Management Studies 32 (4), 419–441. Cefis, E., 2003. Is there persistence in innovative activities? International Journal of Industrial Organisation 21 (4), 489–515. Cefis, E., Espa, G., 1998. Assessing Accuracy in Transition Probability Matrices,Working Paper, Department of Economics, Trento University. Cefis, E., Orsenigo, L., 2001. The persistence of innovative activities; a cross country and cross-sectors comparative analysis. Research Policy 30, 1139–1158. Chesborough, H., 2003. Open Innovation—The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press. Cooke, P., Roper, S., Wylie, P., 2003. The Golden Thread of Innovation and Northern Ireland’s Evolving Regional Innovation System. Regional Studies 37 (4), 365–380. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J., 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York. Fritsch, M., Franke, G., 2004. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers andR&Dcooperation. Research Policy 33 (2), 245–255. Geroski, P.A., Van Reenen, J., Walters, C.F., 1997. How persistently do firms innovate? Research Policy 26, 33–48. Gruber, H., 1990. Product Innovation and Persistence of Leadership: Theory with Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry, Discussion Paper EI/2, Toyota Centre, LSE, June. Hall, L.A., Bagchi-Sen, S., 2002. A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry. Technovation 22 (4), 231–244. Hewitt-Dundas, N., Andreosso-Callaghan, B., Crone, M., Murray, J., Roper, S., 2002. Learning from the Best: Knowledge Transfers from Multi-national Plants in Ireland: A North-South Comparison, NIERC/Euro-Asia Centre, University of Limerick. Iansiti, M., Levien, R., 2004. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review 82 (3), 68–76. Kraft, K., 1990. Are product and process innovations independent of each other? Applied Economics 22 (8), 1029–1038. Kurokawa, S., Tong-Ngok, W., Yamada, H., 2002. Determinants of organisational R&D persistence: a case of semiconductor laser diodes in the USA and Japan. International Journal of Technology Management 23 (7–8), 813–835. Lissack, M., Roos, J., 2001. Be coherent, not visionary. Long Range Planning 34 (1), 53–70. Love, J.H., Roper, S., 2001. Networking and innovation success: a comparison of UK, German and Irish companies. Research Policy 30, 643–661. Love, J.H., Ashcroft, B., Dunlop, S., 1996. Corporate structure, ownership and the likelihood of innovation. Applied Economics 28 (6), 737–746. Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., 1999. Technological entry, exit and survival. Research Policy 28, 643–660. Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., Peretto, P., 1997. Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of innovation and international technological specialisation. International Journal of Industrial Organisation 15, 801–826. Martinez-Ros, E., 2000. Explaining the decision to carry out product and process innovations: the Spanish case. Journal of High Technology Management Research 10 (2), 223–242. O’Malley, E., Roper, S., 2003. The Basis for Trade—A Cross-border Comparison of Trade and Productivity. InterTradeIreland, Newry. O’Malley, E., Hewitt-Dundas, N., Roper, S., 2006. High growth and innovation with low R&D: the case of Ireland. In: Edquist, C., Hommen, L. (Eds.), Innovation Systems in Small Countries. Edward Elgar. Roper, S., Anderson, J., 2000. Innovation and E-Commerce—a crossborder comparison of Irish manufacturing plants, NIERC Research Report 17. Roper, S., Frenkel, A., 2000. Different paths to success? The electronics industry in Israel and Ireland. Environment and Planning C 18, 651–665. Roper, S., Hewitt-Dundas, N., 1998. Innovation, Networks and the Diffusion of Manufacturing Best Practice,NIERCResearch Report 14, NIERC, Belfast, April. Roper, S., Hewitt-Dundas, N., 2006. International innovation comparisons: insight or illusion? Environment and Planning C 24 (3), 385–401. Roper, S., Love, J.H., 2002. Internal versus external R&D: a study of R&D cost among innovating plants. International Journal of the Economics of Business 9 (2), 239–255. Roper, S., Thanki, R., 1995. Innovation 2000 – Northern Ireland’s RTD Strategy. Regional Studies 29 (1), 81–86.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/30538

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us