Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Richard Rorty's philosophical legacy

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Fuller, Steve, 1959- (2008) Richard Rorty's philosophical legacy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol.38 (No.1). pp. 121-132. ISSN 0048-3931

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0048393107311457

Abstract

Richard Rorty's recent death has unleashed a strikingly mixed judgment of his philosophical legacy, ranging from claims to originality to charges of charlatanry. What is clear, however, is Rorty's role in articulating a distinctive American voice in the history of philosophy. He achieved this not only through his own wide-ranging contributions but also by repositioning the pragmatists, especially William James and John Dewey, in the philosophical mainstream. Rorty did for the United States what Hegel and Heidegger had done for Germany-to portray his nation as philosophy's final resting place. He was helped by postwar German philosophers like Jurgen Habermas who were happy to defer to their American conquerors. Rorty's philosophical method can be understood as a sublimation of America's world-historic self-understanding: a place suspicious of foreigners unless they are willing to blend into the "melting pot." In retrospect, the breadth and confidence of Rorty's writing will come to symbolize the moment when the United States, for better or worse, came to be the world's dominant philosophical power.

Item Type: Journal Item
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Rorty, Richard -- Criticism and interpretation, Rorty, Richard -- Influence, Pragmatism, Logical positivism, Analysis (Philosophy)
Journal or Publication Title: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 0048-3931
Date: March 2008
Volume: Vol.38
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 12
Page Range: pp. 121-132
Identification Number: 10.1177/0048393107311457
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Version or Related Resource: Turner, C. (2008). Stop the pidgin - a reply to Steve Fuller. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38(3), pp. 379-382. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/29534. ; Fuller, S. (2008). The coroner is not for turning. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38(3), 383-387. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/29535
Related URLs:
  • Related item in WRAP
  • Related item in WRAP
References: Brandom, R. 1994. Making it explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ———. 2000. Vocabularies of pragmatism: Synthesizing naturalism and historicism, In Rorty and His Critics, edited by R. Brandom, 156-90. Oxford: Blackwell. Buchdahl, G. 1969. Metaphysics and the philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Creath, R., ed. 1990. Dear Carnap, Dear Van. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Friedman, M. 1999. Reconsidering logical positivism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Fuller, S. 1982. Recovering philosophy from Rorty. In PSA 1982, Vol. 1, edited by T. Nickles and P. Asquith, 373-83. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association. ———2000. Thomas Kuhn: A philosophical history for our times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ———. 2006. The philosophical buck stops here. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36:355-66. Holbo, J. 2007. Rorty’s rhetoric of anticipatory retrospective. Crooked Timber. http:// crookedtimber.org/2007/06/13/rortys-rhetoric-of-anticipatory-retrospective/. Nozick, R. 1981. Philosophical explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reisch, R. 2005. How the Cold War transformed the philosophy of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Rorty, R. 1965. Mind-body identity, privacy and categories. Review of Metaphysics 19:25-54. ———, ed. 1967. The linguistic turn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ———. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ———. 1998. Achieving our country: Leftist thought in twentieth century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ———. 1999. Philosophy and social hope. Baltimore, MD: Penguin. ———. 2002. Against bosses, against oligarchies. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/30551

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us