The Library
Open versus closed advertising texts and interpretive communities
Tools
Yannopoulou, Natalia and Elliott, Richard H.. (2008) Open versus closed advertising texts and interpretive communities. International Journal of Advertising, Vol.27 (No.1). pp. 9-36. ISSN 0265-0487
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
This paper examines the interpretation of print advertising by different interpretive communities, and explores how audiences interpret open-text vs closed-text advertisements. A reader-response/reception theory approach was adopted and conducted through depth interviews. Our findings reveal that there are meaningful differences in interpretation based on the social class and gender of the participants. The study demonstrates how interpretive communities use different interpretive strategies, and explores the implications for designing marketing communications.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Arts > Theatre, Performance and Cultural Policy Studies > Centre for Cultural Policy Studies |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Advertising, Consumers -- Research, Advertising -- Social aspects, Communication in marketing |
| Journal or Publication Title: | International Journal of Advertising |
| Publisher: | World Advertising Research Center Ltd. |
| ISSN: | 0265-0487 |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Volume: | Vol.27 |
| Number: | No.1 |
| Number of Pages: | 28 |
| Page Range: | pp. 9-36 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Publication Status: | Published |
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
| References: | Ang, I. (1996) Living Room Wars, Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World. London: Routledge. Bernstein, B.B. (1973) Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Bleich, D. (1986) Gender interests in reading and language, in Flynn, E.A. & Schweickart, P.P. (eds) Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University. Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Buttle, F. (1991) What do people do with advertising? International Journal of Advertising, 10(2), pp. 95–110. Clark, H.H. (1996) Communities, commonalities and communication, in Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. (eds) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 324–355. Dittmar, N. (1976) Sociolinguistics: A Critical Survey of Theory and Application. Birkenhead: Edward Arnold Ltd/Willmer Brothers Ltd. Durgee, J.F. (1986) How consumer sub-cultures code reality: a look at some code types. Advances in Consumer Research, 13(1), pp. 332–337. Eco, U. (1979) The Role of the Reader; Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press. Elliott, R. & Elliott, C. (2005) Idealised images of the male body in advertising: a reader-response exploration. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11(1), pp. 3–20. Elliott, R. & Jankel-Elliott, N. (2003) Using ethnography in strategic consumer research. Qualitative Marketing Research: An International Journal, 6(4), pp. 215–223. Elliott, R. & Jones, A. (1995) Overt sexuality in advertising: a discourse analysis of gender responses. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18 (June), pp. 187–217. Elliott, R. & Ritson, M. (1995) Practicing existential consumption: the lived meaning of sexuality in advertising. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, pp. 740–745. Elliott, R. & Ritson, M. (1997) Post-structuralism and the dialectics of advertising: discourse, ideology, resistance, in Brown, S. & Turley, D. (eds) Consumer Research: Postcards from the Edge. London: Routledge, pp. 190–219. Elliott, R., Eccles, S. & Hodgson, M. (1993) Re-coding gender representations: women, cleaning products, and advertising’s new man. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(3), pp. 311–324. Firat, A.F. & Venkatesh, A. (1995) Liberatory postmodernism and the reenchantment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(December), pp. 239–267. Fish, S.E. (1980) Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Fishman, P. (1983) Interaction: the work women do, in Thorne, B., Kramarae, C. & Henley, N. (eds) Language, Gender and Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 89–102. Fiske, J. (1987) Television Culture. London: Methuen. Harding, D. (1968) Psychological processes in the reading of fiction, in Harold, O. (ed.) Aesthetics in the Modern World. London: Methuen. Hirschman, E. & Thompson, C. (1997) Why media matter: toward a richer understanding of consumers’ relationships with advertising and mass media. Journal of Advertising, 16, pp. 43–60. Holland, N. (1975) 5 Readers Reading. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Holt, D. (1998) Does cultural capital structure American consumption? Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (June), pp. 1–25. Holt, D. (2002) Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (June), pp. 70–90. Iser, W. (1991) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Jespersen, O. (1922) The Woman. Language: Its Nature, Origin and Development. London: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 237–254. Kardes, F. (1988) Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: the effects of conclusion omission and involvement on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (September), pp. 225–233. Kates, S. (2002) Doing brand and subcultural ethnographies: developing the interpretive community concept in consumer research. Advances in Consumer Research, 29(1), pp. 43–65. Labov, W. (1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Laclau, E. (1991) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso. Lakoff, R. (1975) Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row. Le Page, R. & Tabouret-Keller, A. (1985) Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Maltz, D. & Borker R. (1982) A cultural approach to male–female misunderstanding, in Gumperz, J. (ed.) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–216. Markus, H. & Nurius, P. (1986) Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), pp. 954–969. McQuarrie, E. & Mick, D. (1992) On response: a critical pluralistic inquiry into advertising rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (September), pp. 180–197. McQuarrie, E. & Mick, D. (1996) Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (March), pp. 424–438. McQuarrie, E. & Mick, D. (1999) Visual rhetoric in advertising: text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (June), pp. 37–54. Mick, D. & Buhl, K. (1992) A meaning based model of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (December), pp. 317–338. Mick, D. & Politi, L. (1989) Consumers’ interpretations of advertising imagery: a visit to the hell of connotation, in Hirschman, E. (ed.) Interpretive Consumer Research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 85–96. Mothersbaugh, D., Huhmann, A. & Franke, G. (2002) Combinatory and separative effects of rhetorical figures on consumers’ efforts and focus in ad processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (March), pp. 589–602. O’Donohoe, S. (2001) Living with ambivalence: attitudes to advertising in postmodern times. Marketing Theory, 1, pp. 91–108. Peracchio, L. & Meyers-Levy, J. (1994) How ambiguous cropped objects in ad photos affect product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (June), pp. 190–204. Phillips, B. (2000) The impact of verbal anchoring on consumer responses to images ads. Journal of Advertising, 29(1), pp. 15–24. Phillips, B. & McQuarrie, E. (2002) The development, change, and transformation of rhetorical style in magazine advertisements 1954–1999. Journal of Advertising, 16(4), pp. 1–13. Sapir, E. (1949) Culture, Language and Personality: Selected Essays, ed. D.G. Mandelbaum. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Schrøder, K. (1994) Audience semiotics, interpretive communities and the ethnographic turn in media research. Media Culture & Society, 16, pp. 337–346. Schrøder, K., Drotner, K., Kline, S. & Murray, C. (2003), Researching Audiences. London: Arnold. Scott, L. (1994a) The bridge from text to mind: adapting reader-response theory to consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (December), pp. 461–480. Scott, L. (1994b) Images in advertising: the need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (September), pp. 252–273. Slatoff, W.J. (1970) With Respect to Readers: Dimensions of Literary Response. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Spiggle, S. (1994) Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (December), pp. 491–503. Stern, B. (1989) Literary criticism and consumer research: overview and illustrative analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (December), pp. 322–334. Stern, B. (1992) Feminist literary theory and advertising research: a new ‘reading’ of the text and the consumer. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 14(1), pp. 9–21. Trudgill, P. (1972) Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1, pp. 179–195. Trutz, T. & Brown, R.H. (1982) Sociolinguistics and the politics of helping: language use in the political mobilization of low-income groups. Acta Sociologica, 25, pp. 373–387. Ustuner, T. & Holt, D. (2003) Toward a cultural theory of class consumption: the social consumption of the Turkish hand-knitted sweater. Advances in Consumer Research, 30, pp. 282–283. Warlaumont, H. (1995) Advertising images: from persuasion to polysemy. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 17(1), pp. 19–31. Whorf, B.L. (1956) Language, Thought and Reality (ed. J.B. Carroll). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Zimmerman, D. & West, C. (1975) Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation, in Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (eds) Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 105–129. |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/30569 |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

