Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Remarks on drift estimation for diffusion processes

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Pokern, Yvo, Stuart, A. M. and Vanden-Eijnden, Eric. (2009) Remarks on drift estimation for diffusion processes. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, Vol.8 (No.1). pp. 69-95. ISSN 1540-3459

[img] PDF
WRAP_Pokern_remarks_drift.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (356Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/070694806

Abstract

In applications such as molecular dynamics it is of interest to fit Smoluchowski and Langevin equations to data. Practitioners often achieve this by a variety of seemingly ad hoc procedures such as fitting to the empirical measure generated by the data, and fitting to properties of auto-correlation functions. Statisticians, on the other hand, often use estimation procedures which fit diffusion processes to data by applying the maximum likelihood principle to the path-space density of the desired model equations, and through knowledge of the properties of quadratic variation. In this note we show that these procedures used by practitioners and statisticians to fit drift functions are, in fact, closely related and can be thought of as two alternative ways to regularize the (singular) likelihood function for the drift. We also present the results of numerical experiments which probe the relative efficacy of the two approaches to model identification and compare them with other methods such as the minimum distance estimator.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Mathematics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Diffusion processes, Langevin equations, Parameter estimation, Molecular dynamics
Journal or Publication Title: Multiscale Modeling & Simulation
Publisher: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
ISSN: 1540-3459
Date: 2009
Volume: Vol.8
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 27
Page Range: pp. 69-95
Identification Number: 10.1137/070694806
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
References: [1] F. M. Bandi and P. C. B. Phillips, Fully nonparametric estimation of scalar diffusion models, Econometrica, 71 (2003), pp. 241–283. [2] F. Comte, V. Genon-Catalot and Y. Rozenholc, Penalized Nonparametric Mean Square Estimation of the Coefficients of Diffusion Processes, Prpublication MAP5 n2005-21, to appear in Bernoulli. [3] R. Durrett, Stochastic Calculus – A practical Introduction, CRC Press, London (1996). [4] L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, AMS (1998). [5] C. W. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods, Springer, Berlin (1985). [6] E. Gobet, M. Hoffmann and M. Reiss, Nonparametric estimation of scalar diffusions based on low frequency data, Ann. Stat., 32 (2004), pp. 2223–2253. [7] H.Grubm¨uller, P.Tavan, Molecular dynamics of conformational substates for a simplified protein model, J.Chem.Phys., 101 (1994), pp. 5047–5057. [8] G. Hummer, Position-dependent diffusion coefficients and free energies from Bayesian analysis of equilibrium and replica molecular dynamics simulations, New Journal of Physics, 7:34 (2005). [9] J. P. Kahane, Some random series of functions, CUP (1985). [10] O. Kallenberg, Foundations of Modern Probability, Springer (1997). [11] Y. A. Kutoyants, Statistical Inference for Ergodic Diffusion Processes, Springer (2004). [12] A.J. Majda and I. Timofeyev and E. Vanden-Eijnden, A mathematical framework for stochastic climate models, Comm. Pure App. Math., 54 (2001), pp. 891–974. [13] X. Mao, Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications, Norwood, second Edition (2007). [14] J. Mattingly, A. M. Stuart, D. J. Higham, Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise. Stoch. Proc. and Applics, 101 (2002), pp. 185- 232. [15] W. Nadler, A. T. Br¨unger, K. Schulten and M. Karplus, Molecular and stochastic dy- namics of proteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 84 (1987), pp. 7933-7937. [16] O. Papaspiliopoulos, Y. Pokern, G. O. Roberts, A. M. Stuart, Bayesian Nonparametric Drift Estimation and Finite Elements, in preparation, 2007. [17] G. Pavliotis, A. M. Stuart, Parameter Estimation for Multiscale Diffusions, J. Stat. Phys., 127 (2007), pp. 741-781. [18] N.Privault, A.R´eveillac, Superefficient drift estimation on the Wiener Space, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I, 343 (2006), pp. 607–612. [19] B.L.S. Prakasa Rao, Statistical Inference for Diffusion Type Processes, Arnold Publishers, London (1999). [20] H. Risken, The Fokker Planck Equation, Springer (1984). [21] G. O. Roberts, Exact Simulation and Inference for Diffusions, Presentation and lecture notes, SemStat (2007). [22] J. E. Straub, M. Borkovec, B. J. Berne, Calculation of Dynamic Friction on Intramolecular Degress of Freedom, J. Phys. Chem., 91:19, (1987), pp. 4995-4998. [23] D. Williams, Probability with Martingales, CUP (1991).
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3058

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us