Facilitating learning and knowledge transfer through supplier development
Giannakis, Mihalis. (2008) Facilitating learning and knowledge transfer through supplier development. Supply Chain Management , Volume 13 (Number 1). pp. 62-72. ISSN 1359-8546Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540810850328
Purpose - This paper aims to explore how supplier development programmes can be adapted to create value for organisations through generation and transfer of knowledge between supply chain partners. Design/methodology/approach - Based on the existing literature on supplier development, knowledge transfer and learning and on the interaction model of the Industrial Marketing and Purchasing group, certain factors that condition learning and knowledge transfer through supplier development programmes are discussed and a conceptual framework for improving knowledge transfer is developed. Empirical research is conducted in four large multinational organisations, exploring how supply chain partners can better utilise their capabilities and facilitate knowledge transfer through these programmes. Findings - Several organisational and relational factors that affect the success of knowledge transfer in supplier development programmes are identified and discussed and several management practices are proposed to enhance the knowledge transfer process within these programmes. Research limitations/implications - The research provides evidence that knowledge transfer requires not only financial commitment and strategic decision making, but also appropriate design and execution of certain processes and a distinctive governance structure. Based on the findings a research agenda is proposed to investigate the impact of knowledge transfer on suppliers' productivity and the associated risk arising from knowledge leakages. Practical implications - A systematic methodology is proposed to explore how supplier development programmes can achieve their potential among supply chain partners, by examining how certain factors influence the knowledge transfer process. Originality/value - The paper proposes an innovative framework for analysing knowledge transfer among and between organisations and a knowledge-based perspective in the design and management of supplier development programmes, so that a learning and knowledge transfer environment can be fostered.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Industrial procurement, Knowledge management, Business logistics|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Supply Chain Management|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.|
|Number of Pages:||11|
|Page Range:||pp. 62-72|
|Access rights to Published version:||Restricted or Subscription Access|
|References:||Argote, L. (1999), Organisational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA. Argyris, C. and Schon, D.A. (1978), Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Berta, W.B. and Baker, R. (2004), “Factors that impact the transfer and retention of best practices for reducing error in hospitals”, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 90-7. Chesborough, H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA. Cox, A. (2004), “The art of the possible: relationship management in power regimes and supply chains”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 346-56. Edwards, T., Battisti, G. and Neely, A. (2004), “Value creation and the UK economy: a review of strategic options”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 5/6 Nos 3/4, pp. 191-213. Eurostat (2006), Eurostat, available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec. europa.eu/extraction/evalight/EVAlight.jsp?A¼ 1&language ¼ en&r oot ¼ /theme0/strind/ecobac/ecobac_t. Ford, D. (1997), “An interaction approach, in international marketing and purchasing of industrial goods”, in Ford, D. (Ed.), Understanding Business Markets: Interactions Relationships and Networks, The Dryden Press, London, pp. 3-22. Gilbert, M. and Cordey-Hayes, M. (1996), “Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation”, Technovation, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 301-12. Grant, R.M. (2005), Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 5th ed., Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. Gupta, A.K. and Govidarajan, V. (2000), “Knowledge flows within multinational corporations”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 4, p. 473. Handfield, R.B., Krause, D.R., Scannell, T.V. and Monczka, R.M. (2000), “Avoid the pitfalls in supplier development”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 41 No. 2, p. 37. Helper, S.R. and Sako, M. (1995), “Supplier relations in Japan and the United States: are they converging?”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 77-85. Kotabe, M., Martin, X. and Domoto, H. (2003), “Gaining from vertical partnerships: knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the US and Japanese automotive industries”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 4, p. 293. Krause, D.R. (1995), “Interorganizational cooperation in supplier development: influencing factors”, PhD thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. Krause, D.R. (1997), “Supplier development: current practices and outcomes”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, p. 12. Krause, D.R. and Ellram, L.M. (1997), “Success factors in supplier development”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 27 No. 1, p. 39. MacDuffie, J.P. and Helper, S. (1997), “Creating lean suppliers: diffusing lean production through the supply chain”, California Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 118-51. Modi, S. and Malbert, V. (2007), “Supplier development: improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 42-64. Mohr, J. and Sengupta, S. (2002), “Managing the paradox of inter-firm learning: the role governance mechanisms”, Journal of Business &and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 282-301. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Develop and Sustain Competitive Advantage, HBS Press, Boston, MA. OECD (2005), “International comparisons of labour productivity levels: estimates for 2004”, September, available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/31/7/29880166.pdf. Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R.I. (1999), “Knowing what to do is not enough: turning knowledge into action”, California Management Review, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 83-109. Polanyi, M. (1967), The Tacit Dimension, Routledge and Kegan, London. Sako, M. (2004), “Supplier development at Honda, Nissan and Toyota: comparative case studies of organisational capability enhancement”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 281-308. Stuart, I., Deckert, P., Mccutcheon, D. and Kunst, R. (1998), “Case study: a leveraged learning network”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 81-93. Teece, J.D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 509-33. Teece, D. (1998), “Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets”, California Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 55-79. Watts, C.A. and Hahn, C.K. (1993), “Supplier development programs: an empirical analysis”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 10-17. Zander, U. and Kogut, B. (1995), “Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organisational capabilities: an empirical test”, Organisation Science, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 76-92.|
Actions (login required)