Finn, Margot C. (2005) Law’s empire : English legal cultures at home and abroad [Review Article]. Historical Journal, Vol.48 (No.1 ). pp. 295-303. doi:10.1017/S0018246X04004315

Preview

PDF WRAP_Finn_LAWS_EMPIRE_ENGLISH_LEGAL_CULTURES_AT_.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (78Kb)

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The past few decades have witnessed a welcome expansion in historians’ understanding of
English legal cultures, a development that has extended the reach of legal history far
beyond the boundaries circumscribed by the Inns of Court, the central tribunals of
Westminster, and the periodic provincial circuits of their judges, barristers, and attorneys.
The publication of J. G. A. Pocock’s classic study, The ancient constitution and the feudal law, in
1957 laid essential foundations for this expansion by underlining the centrality of legal
culture to wider political and intellectual developments in the early modern period.1
Recent years have seen social historians elaborate further upon the purchase exercised by
legal norms outside the courtroom. Criminal law was initially at the vanguard of this
historiographical trend, and developments in this field continue to revise and enrich our
understanding of the law’s pervasive reach in British culture.2 But civil litigation – most
notably disputes over contracts and debts – now occupies an increasingly prominent
position within the social history of the law. Law’s empire, denoting the area of dominion
marked out by the myriad legal cultures that emanated both from parliamentary statutes
and English courts, is now a far more capacious field of study than an earlier generation of
legal scholars could imagine. Without superseding the need for continued attention to
established lines of legal history, the mapping of this imperial terrain has underscored the
imperative for new approaches to legal culture that emphasize plurality and dislocation
rather than the presumed coherence of the common law.

1 J. G. A. Pocock, The ancient constitution and the feudal law: a study of English legal thought in the seventeenth
century (Cambridge, 1957).
2 See esp. David Cairns, Advocacy and the making of the adversarial criminal trial, 1800–1865 (Oxford,
1998), and John Langbein, The origins of the adversary criminal trial (Oxford, 2003).

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Arts > History
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Common law -- History , Common law -- English influences
Journal or Publication Title:	Historical Journal
Publisher:	Cambridge University Press
ISSN:	0018-246X
Book Title:	Baker, J.H. (2000). The common law tradition : lawyers, books and the law. London: Hambledon.
Official Date:	21 March 2005
Dates:	Date Event 21 March 2005 Published
Volume:	Vol.48
Number:	No.1
Number of Pages:	9
Page Range:	pp. 295-303
DOI:	10.1017/S0018246X04004315
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads