Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

OR and systems - some comments on Checkland's reply to Eden and Ackerman

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Ormerod, R. J. (2008) OR and systems - some comments on Checkland's reply to Eden and Ackerman. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.59 (No.1). pp. 139-142. ISSN 0160-5682

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602483

Abstract

In the JORS Special Issue on Problem Structuring Methods, Eden and Ackermann (2006) offer a Viewpoint and Checkland (2006) replies. This echoes a previous JORS Special Issue on ‘Systems in OR’, which featured full articles by both Eden and Checkland.

Item Type: Journal Item
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): System analysis, Problem solving, Operations research, Systems theory
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of the Operational Research Society
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
ISSN: 0160-5682
Date: January 2008
Volume: Vol.59
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 5
Page Range: pp. 139-142
Identification Number: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602483
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Version or Related Resource: Checkland P (2006). Reply to Eden and Ackermann: Any future for problem structuring methods? J Opl Res Soc 57: 769–771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602111. Eden, C. and Ackermann, C. (2006). Where next for problem structuring methods. J Opl Res Soc 57, 766–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602090
References: Checkland P (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley: Chichester. Checkland P (1983). OR and the systems movement: Mappings and conflicts. J Opl Res Soc 34: 661–676. Checkland P (2006). Reply to Eden and Ackermann: Any future for problem structuring methods? J Opl Res Soc 57: 769–771. Eden C and Ackermann F (2006). Where next for problem structuring methods. J Opl Res Soc 57: 766–768. | Article | Eden C and Graham R (1983). Halfway to infinity: Systems theorizing for the practitioners? J Opl Res Soc 34: 723–728. Keys P (1989). OR as technology: Some issues and implications. J Opl Res Soc 40: 753–759. Ormerod RJ (1995). The role of methodologies in systems strategy development: Reflections on experience. In: Stowell F.A. (ed). Information Systems Provision: The Contribution of Soft System Methodology. McGraw-Hill: Maidenhead, pp. 75–101. Ormerod RJ (2006). The history and ideas of pragmatism. J Opl Res Soc 57: 892–909. Probert SK (1998). A critical analysis of soft systems analysis and its (theoretical and practical) relationship with phenomenology. Systemist 20: 187–207. Taket A and White L (1996). Pragmatic pluralism: An explication. Systemic Pract 9: 571–585. Wallace RA and Wolf A (2006). Contemporary Sociological Theory, 6th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/30855

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us