Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

A validation study of the new Zealand score for hip and knee surgery

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Toye, Francine, Barlow, Julie, Wright, Chris and Lamb, S. E. (Sallie E.). (2007) A validation study of the new Zealand score for hip and knee surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (No.464). pp. 190-195. ISSN 0009-921X

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e31815725d9

Abstract

In the absence of consensus over criteria for performing total knee arthroplasty, the variability of symptom burden, and limited resources, some ways to prioritize whether and when to treat would be useful. In the UK, some payers use the New Zealand score to determine access to an orthopaedic surgeon despite limited validation. We tested convergent validity of this score and ascertained its ability to discriminate between groups of patients with high or low disease burden as determined by a validated disease-specific measure. The sample included patients being considered for total knee arthroplasty at one hospital. Convergent validity was tested against the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The ability of the New Zealand score to discriminate between high and low disease burdens was tested by plotting a receiver operating characteristic curve. Correlations between the New Zealand score and WOMAC pain and function were moderate (0.5 and 0.54, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77, suggesting the New Zealand score was able to discriminate. This study supports the validity of the New Zealand score. However, additional multisite and extended evaluations are needed before we would recommend widespread implementation.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
R Medicine > RD Surgery
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ISSN: 0009-921X
Date: November 2007
Number: No.464
Number of Pages: 6
Page Range: pp. 190-195
Identification Number: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31815725d9
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Related URLs:
  • http://journals.lww.com/corr/Abstract/20...
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/31206

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us