Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Treatment of depression in primary care: socio-economic status, clinical need and receipt of treatment

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Weich, Scott, Nazareth, Irwin, Morgan, Louise and King, Michael. (2007) Treatment of depression in primary care: socio-economic status, clinical need and receipt of treatment. British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol.191 (No.2). pp. 164-169. ISSN 0007-1250

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.032219

Abstract

Background Depression is prevalent, costly and often undertreated. Aims To test the hypothesis that people with low socio-economic status are least likely to receive and adhere to evidence-based treatments for depression, after controlling for clinical need. Method Individuals with an ICD-10 depressive episode in the past 12 months (n=866) were recruited from 7271 attendees in 36 general practices in England and Wales. Depressive episodes were identified using the 12-month Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Treatment receipt and adherence were assessed by structured interview, and rated using evidence-based criteria. Results We identified 332 individuals (38.3%) who received and adhered to evidence-based treatment. There were few socio-economic differences in treatment allocation. Although those without educational qualifications were least likely to receive psychological treatments (OR=0.55,95% Cl 0.34-0.89, P=0.02), this association was not statistically significant after adjusting for depression severity Conclusions We found no evidence of inverse care in the treatment of moderate and severe depression in primary care in England and Wales.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: British Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher: Royal College of Psychiatrists
ISSN: 0007-1250
Date: August 2007
Volume: Vol.191
Number: No.2
Number of Pages: 6
Page Range: pp. 164-169
Identification Number: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.032219
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/31416

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us