Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Abuse of the disabled child: a systematic review of population-based studies

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Govindshenoy, M. and Spencer, Nick (2007) Abuse of the disabled child: a systematic review of population-based studies. Child: Care, Health and Development, Vol.33 (No.5). pp. 552-558. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00693.x

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00693.x

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Objective To ascertain the strength of the association between childhood disability and abuse and neglect.

Methods Systematic review of population- based studies published between 1966 and January 2006. Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane library, National Research Register, Social Sciences database and PsychInfo databases were searched for potentially relevant studies. Inclusion criteria: populationbased cohort, case - control or cross- sectional studies of children < 18 years of age that reported empirical data on the association of abuse with disability. Risk estimates were expressed as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals ( CI) where possible. Meta- analysis was not undertaken because of heterogeneity of studies.

Results Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Two were longitudinal studies, one was a retrospective birth cohort and the remaining study was a cross- sectional survey. Types of disability studied varied widely as did methods used to ascertain abuse and neglect. Two studies accounted for potential confounding. Three studies reported an association between psychological and emotional disabilities and abuse. Two studies reported an association of learning disability with abuse. Only one study examined the association of physical disability ( cerebral palsy) with abuse reporting an adjusted odds ratio for all forms of abuse of 1.79 ( 95% CI 0.96, 3.36) and for physical abuse of 3.00 ( 95% CI 1.29, 6.78).

Conclusions The evidence base for an association of disability with abuse and neglect is weak. Psychological and emotional problems, and learning difficulties appear to be associated with abuse but this association might arise because these conditions share a common aetiological pathway with abuse. There is limited evidence that physical disability predisposes to abuse.

Item Type: Journal Item
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RJ Pediatrics
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Health and Social Studies
Journal or Publication Title: Child: Care, Health and Development
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 0305-1862
Official Date: September 2007
Dates:
DateEvent
September 2007Published
Volume: Vol.33
Number: No.5
Number of Pages: 7
Page Range: pp. 552-558
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00693.x
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us