Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

An evaluation of objective feedback in basic life support (BLS) training

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Spooner, Brendan B., Fallaha, Jon F., Kocierz, Laura, Smith, Christopher Matthew, Smith, Sam C. L. and Perkins, Gavin D. (2007) An evaluation of objective feedback in basic life support (BLS) training. Resuscitation, Vol.73 (No.3). pp. 417-424. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.017 ISSN 0300-9572.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10....

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Background: Studies show that acquisition and retention of BLS skills is poor, and this may contribute to low survival from cardiac arrest. Feedback from instructors during BLS training is often lacking. This study investigates the effects of continuous feedback from a manikin on chest compression and ventilation techniques during training compared to instructor feedback atone.

Materials and methods: A prospective randomised controlled trial. First-year healthcare students at the University of Birmingham were randomised to receive training in standard or feedback groups. The standard group were taught by an instructor using a conventional manikin. The feedback group used a 'Skillreporter' manikin, which provides continuous feedback on ventilation volume and chest compression depth and rate in addition to instructor feedback. SkiR acquisition was tested immediately after training and 6 weeks later.

Results: Ninety-eight participants were recruited (conventional n = 49; Skillreporter n=49) and were tested after training. Sixty-six students returned (Skillreporter n = 34; conventional n = 32) for testing 6 weeks later. The Skillreporter group achieved better compression depth (39.96 mm versus 36.71 mm, P < 0.05), and more correct compressions (58.0% versus 40.4%, P < 0.05) at initial testing. The Skillreporter group also achieved more correct compressions at week 6 (43.1% versus 26.5%, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that objective feedback during training improves the performance of BILS skills significantly when tested immediately after training and at re-testing 6 weeks later. However, CPR performance declined substantiary over time in both groups. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. AR rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: Resuscitation
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd
ISSN: 0300-9572
Official Date: June 2007
Dates:
DateEvent
June 2007Published
Volume: Vol.73
Number: No.3
Number of Pages: 8
Page Range: pp. 417-424
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.017
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us