Muslim religious accommodation in public institutions: an exploration of religious equality in principle and practice
Suckle, Elsa (2009) Muslim religious accommodation in public institutions: an exploration of religious equality in principle and practice. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b2334551~S15
This thesis assesses fairness for Muslim religious value claims in liberal institutions
aspiring to public neutrality. This is achieved though critically examining neutrality
and religious equality in liberal political theory, national models of secularism, and
instantiations at the local level of schools and workplaces.
Through adopting a contextual approach to political theory, I argue for the situated
nature of fairness. The aim of this approach is to utilise ideal theory to arrive at
realistic guidelines fit for real (non-ideal) worlds. I therefore both address the limits
of theory to practice and show how empirical contextualisation might inform revised
theories better equipped to account for contextual variables.
In order to address the shortcomings in existing models of neutrality and in existing
ways of theorising about religious exemptions in contemporary liberal political
theory, two arguments for accommodation are advanced: corrective grounds and
reasonable access grounds. Corrective grounds stress the need to correct for existing
inequities already in place privileging majoritarian groups, as we face the task of
responding fairly to minority requests for accommodation. Reasonable access
grounds emphasise the significance of environmental factors in exploring entitlement
to religious exemptions from general rules and regulations. Both these accounts build
on empirical contextualisation.
Evidence supporting these arguments is derived from two national contexts – the U.S. and Sweden – and takes the form of semi-structured elite interviews with a range of individuals with expertise on questions of Muslim religious accommodation.
Through this analysis, the thesis contends that the ‘costs’ associated with Muslim value claims in liberal institutions should not exclusively be attributed to inherent factors. On these grounds I argue for the remodelling of public institutions in order to facilitate the ease with which religious commitments are combined with access to, and participation in, public institutions aspiring to neutrality.
|Item Type:||Thesis or Dissertation (PhD)|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Public institutions -- United States, Public institutions -- Sweden, Equality -- Religious aspects -- Islam, Fairness|
|Official Date:||November 2009|
|Institution:||University of Warwick|
|Theses Department:||Department of Politics and International Studies|
|Supervisor(s)/Advisor:||Reeve, Andrew ; Clayton, Matthew, 1966- ; Beckford, James ; Carter, Robert|
|Sponsors:||Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)|
|Extent:||408 leaves : charts|
Actions (login required)