Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Transforming audit technologies: business risk audit methodologies and the audit field

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Robson, Keith, Humphrey, Christopher, Khalifa, Rihab and Jones, Julian. (2007) Transforming audit technologies: business risk audit methodologies and the audit field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.32 (No.4-5). pp. 409-438. ISSN 0361-3682

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.002

Abstract

Business Risk Audit (BRA) methodologies have been promoted by a number of the large audit firms in response, they claim, to the challenges of the information age and corporate clients' needs for assurance. This paper subjects their claim to critical scrutiny, drawing on the perspectives of neo-institutional theories of legitimacy, the sociology of professional knowledge and the sociology of science and technology. To bring into play new Business Risk Audit methodologies a number of the larger firms have sought, through their auditing practice, to renegotiate the bases of their professional identity and status within audit firms and to widen their jurisdictional claims over other areas of expertise. These moves have been accompanied by the legitimation and embedding of Business Risk Audit in revised constructions of the market for audit, in abstract academic knowledges, reforms of professional education, and professional regulations. In providing a constructivist account of Business Risk Audit technologies, we argue for a theory of audit change that recognises (i) the centrality of legitimation processes and (ii) the co-construction of audit technology and the audit field. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Journal or Publication Title: Accounting, Organizations and Society
Publisher: Pergamon
ISSN: 0361-3682
Date: May 2007
Volume: Vol.32
Number: No.4-5
Number of Pages: 30
Page Range: pp. 409-438
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.002
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Title of Event: HEC Meeting 2006
Type of Event: Other
Location of Event: Paris, France
Date(s) of Event: May, 2006
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/32116

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us