Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Evaluating local strategic partnerships : theory and practice of change

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Geddes, Mike, 1943-, Davies, Jonathan, 1966- and Fuller, C. (Crispian). (2007) Evaluating local strategic partnerships : theory and practice of change. Local Government Studies, Vol.33 (No.1). pp. 97-116. ISSN 0300-3930

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Davies_Evaluating_0770216-lb-150611-ssrn-id1813748.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (485Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03003930601081358

Abstract

Local Strategic Partnerships (LSPs) are a major recent innovation in English local governance. As the 'partnership of partnerships' in a locality, the ability of the LSP to provide an arena for community leadership and joined up service delivery is vital to the Local Government Modernisation Agenda. Drawing on material from the national evaluation of LSPs, this paper assesses their progress. A theory of change (ToC) approach was adopted in the evaluation, and the paper shows how this approach was developed and utilised. The main findings from the evaluation are then presented and discussed. In conclusion, the article draws some wider conclusions both about the strengths and weaknesses of the ToC approach and about LSPs themselves.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: J Political Science > JS Local government Municipal government
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Local government -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title: Local Government Studies
Publisher: Routledge Journals, Taylor and Fancis Ltd
ISSN: 0300-3930
Date: 2007
Volume: Vol.33
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 20
Page Range: pp. 97-116
Identification Number: 10.1080/03003930601081358
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
References: Aulakh, S., Woolford, J., Smith, M. and Skelcher. C (2002) Accreditation of Local Strategic Partnerships (2001/02): An analysis and review of documentation. London: Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, Research Report 4. Bailey, N. (2003) Strategic partnerships in England: The continuing search for collaborative advantage, leadership and strategy in urban governance. Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 4 (4), 443-457. Balloch, S. and Taylor, M. (Eds) (2001) Partnership Working: Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press. Chen HT, 1990, Theory driven evaluations, London: Sage. Clarke and Newman (1997) The Managerial State. London: Sage Connell JP and Kubisch AC, 1998, Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects and problems, in Fulbright-Anderson K et al (Eds) New approaches to evaluating community initiative, Vol 2, Theory, measurement and analysis, Aspen Institute, Washington DC, 15-44. Davies J S, 2004, Conjuncture or Disjuncture? An Institutionalist Analysis of Local Regeneration Partnerships in the UK. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(3) 570-585 Davies J S, 2005, The antinomies of „third way‟ institution building: the case of local strategic partnerships. 35th Annual Meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Salt Lake City, Utah, April 2005. Davies J S, 2006, The limits of partnership for democratic inclusion and the case for exit. 36th Annual Meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, 19-22 April 2006, Montreal, Quebec. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 2001 Local Strategic Partnerships, Government Guidance, London: DETR. Fuller, C. (2006) State rescaling, multi-level governance and the search for joined-up local governance. Geoforum, (Under review). Fuller, C. and Geddes, M. 'Local governance under neo-liberalism: Local state restructuring and processes of scalar transformation in England', Antipode, (Preparing for resubmission). Geddes M (2006) Theories of Change: Issues Paper. London: ODPM Geddes, M. (2006) Partnership and the limits of local Governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 30: 1. Geddes M and Benington J, 2001, Local partnership and social exclusion in the European Union: New modes of local governance? London: Routledge. Hastings, A. (2003) Strategic, multi-level neighbourhood regeneration: an outward-looking approach at last? In R. Imrie and M. Raco Urban Renaissance? New Labour, community and urban policy. Bristol: Policy Johnson, C. and Osbourne, S. (2003) Local strategic partnerships, neighbourhood renewal and the limits of co-governance. Public Money and Management, July, 147-154. Jones and Ward (2002) Excavating the logic of British Urban Policy: Neoliberalism as the “crisis of crisis-management.” In N. Brenner and N. Theodore (2002) Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell. Mackenzie M and Blamey A, 2005, The practice and the theory: Lessons from the application of a theories of change approach, Evaluation, 11, 151-168. Marsh D and Rhodes R A W, 1992, Implementing Thatcherite policies: an audit of an era. Philadelphia, Open University Press. ODPM, 2006, Local Strategic Partnerships: Shaping their future. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Pierson P, 2000, Increasing returns, path dependency and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94(2), 251-267. Sanderson I, 2000, Evaluation in complex policy systems, Evaluation, 6, 4, 433-454. Skelcher C, Mathur N and Smith M, 2005, The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public administration 83(3) 573-596 Skelcher C, 2005, Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism, and the design of democratic governance. Governance. 18(1) 89-110 Sorensen E and Torfing J, 2005, The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandanavian political studies 28(3) 195-218 Stoker G, 2002, „Life is a Lottery: New Labour‟s Strategy for the Reform of Devolved Governance‟ in Public Administration 80(3), 417-434 Sullivan H, Barnes M and Matka E, 2002, Building collaborative capacity through theories of change: Early lessons from the evaluation of Health Action Zones in England, Evaluation, 8, 205-226. Sullivan H, Gillanders G, Goss S and Steele J, 2003, Developing a ‘Theory of Change’ to evaluate Local Public Service Agreements, LPSA Evaluation Working Paper, London, ODPM. Sullivan H and Stewart M, 2006, Who owns the theory of change? Evaluation, 12, 2, forthcoming. Sullivan H and Skelcher C, 2002, Working across boundaries: Collaboration in the public services. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Weiss C, 1995, Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families, in Connell JP et al (Eds) New approaches to community initiatives, Vol 1 Contents, methods and context, Washington DC, Aspen Institute.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/32124

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us