The Library

Inter-cultural differences in response to a computer-based anti-bullying intervention

Tools

Watson, Scott, Vannini, Natalie, Woods, Sarah, Dautenhahn, Kerstin, Sapouna, Maria, Enz, Sibylle, Schneider, Wolfgang, Wolke, Dieter, Hall, Lynne, Paiva, Ana and André, Elisabeth, Prof. Dr.. (2010) Inter-cultural differences in response to a computer-based anti-bullying intervention. Educational Research, Vol.52 (No.1). pp. 61-80. ISSN 0013-1881

PDF
WRAP_Wolke_inter-Cultural_differences.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (329Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131881003588261

Abstract

Background and purpose: Many holistic anti-bullying interventions have been attempted, with mixed success, while little work has been done to promote a 'self-help' approach to victimisation. The rise of the ICT curriculum and computer support in schools now allows for approaches that benefit from technology to be implemented. This study evaluates the cross-cultural effects of a computer-based anti-bullying intervention on primary school-aged children's knowledge about bullying and relevant coping strategies. Programme description: FearNot! is an interactive computer-based virtual learning environment designed for use as an anti-bullying intervention. It includes interactive virtual agents who assume the most common participant roles found in episodes of bullying. FearNot! was used by children over three consecutive weeks to allow its effectiveness to be evaluated in a longitudinal in situ programme. Sample: Two comparable samples were drawn from the UK and Germany. In the UK, 651 participants (aged 8-11) were recruited from primary schools in Hertfordshire, Coventry and Warwickshire, whereas the 535 German participants (aged 7-10) were sourced from Grundschulen in the Bayern and Hessen regions. Because of lack of parental consent, late joiners and absences/missing responses, data from 908 participants (UK 493; Germany 415) were analysed. Design and methods: A quasi-experimental, pre/post-tests control group design employed pre-published and bespoke questionnaires to collect data. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted. Results: UK students possessed higher coping strategy knowledge scores than German participants, but German children's scores improved over time and as a result of the FearNot! intervention. Conclusions: Overall, while not effective at increasing children's coping strategy knowledge in this study, the FearNot! intervention could prove a useful classroom tool to approach the issue of bullying as part of a wider initiative. Cultural differences at baseline and reactions to the intervention are discussed.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1501 Primary Education B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Intercultural communication, Bullying in schools -- Great Britain -- Prevention, Bullying in schools -- Germany -- Prevention, Virtual reality in education, Virtual reality therapy, Education, Primary -- Audio-visual aids
Journal or Publication Title:	Educational Research
Publisher:	Routledge
ISSN:	0013-1881
Date:	March 2010
Volume:	Vol.52
Number:	No.1
Page Range:	pp. 61-80
Identification Number:	10.1080/00131881003588261
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Sixth Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP6)
Grant number:	IST-4-027656-STP (SFP)
References:	Arora, T. 1996. Defining bullying. School Psychology International, 17: 317-329. Aylett, R. S., S. Louchart. 2003. Towards a narrative theory of virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 7: 2-9. Aylett, R.S., S. Louchart, J. Dias, A.Paiva, and M. Vala. 2005. FearNot! An experiment in emergent narrative. Paper presented at Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA), September 12-14, in Kos, Greece. Becker, L.A. Effect size calculators. University of Colorado at Colorado Springs. http://web.uccs.edu/lbecker/Psy590/escalc3.htm. Berger, K.S. 2007. Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27: 90-126. Björkqvist, K. 1994. Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, nos. 3/4: 177-188. Bollmer, J.M., R. Milich, M.J. Harris, and M.A. Maras. 2005. A friend in need: The role of friendship quality as a protective factor in peer victimzation and bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, no. 6: 701-712. Camodeca, M., and F.A. Goossens. 2005. Children�s opinions on effective strategies to cope with bullying: The importance of bullying role and perspective. Educational Research, 47, no. 1: 93-105. Cowie, H. 2000. Bystanding or standing by: Gender issues in coping with bullying in English schools. Aggressive Behavior 26: 85-97. Craig, W., D. Pepler, and J. Blais. 2007. Responding to bullying. School Psychology International, 28, no. 4: 465-477. Crick, N.R., and J.K. Grotpeter. 1995. Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66: 710-722. Crick, N.R., and J.K. Grotpeter. 1996. Children�s treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression. Development and Psychopathology, 8: 367-380. Dias, J. 2005. FearNot! Creating emotional autonomous synthetic characters for emphatic interaction. PhD diss., Instituto Superior Técnico. Dias, J., and A. Paiva. 2005. Feeling and reasoning: a computational model for emotional agents. Paper presented at 12th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA), December 5-8, in Covilhã, Portugal. Dias, J., W.C. Ho, T. Vogt, N. Beeckman, A. Paiva, and E. André. 2007. I know what I did last summer: Autobiographic memory in synthetic characters. Paper presented at Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), September 12-14, in Lisbon, Portugal. Enz, S. et al. In preparation. Eslea, M., and P.K. Smith. 1998. The long-term effectiveness of anti-bullying work in primary schools. Educational Research 40, no. 2: 203-218. Fekkes, M., F.I.M, Pijpers, A.M. Fredriks, T. Vogels, and S.P. Verloove-Vanhorick. 2006. Do bullied children get Ill, or do Ill children get bullied? A prospective cohort study on the relationship between bullying and health-related symptoms. Pediatrics 117, no. 5:1568-1574. Gini, G. 2006. Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What�s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32: 528-539. Hall, L., S. Woods, R. Aylett, L. Newall, and A. Paiva. 2005. Achieving empathic engagement through affective interaction with synthetic characters. Paper presented at Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), October 22-24, in Beijing, China. Hanewinkel, Reiner. 2004. Prevention of bullying in German schools: An evaluation of an anti-bullying approach. In Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be?, ed. P.K. Smith, D. Pepler, and K. Rigby., 81-97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hodges, E.V.E., and D.G. Perry. 1999. Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimisation in peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76, no. 4: 677-685. Hymel, S., N. Rocke-Henderson, and R.A. Bonanno. 2005. Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue, 8:1-11. Joliffe, D., and D.P. Farrington. 2006. Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32: 540-550. Kanetsuna, T., P.K. Smith, and Y. Morita. 2006. Coping with bullying at schools: Children�s recommended strategies and attitudes to school-based interventions in England and Japan. Aggressive Behavior, 32: 570-580. Kochenderfer, B.J., and G.W. Ladd. 1997. Victimized children�s responses to peers� aggression: Behaviors associated with reduced versus continued victimization. Development and Pathology, 9: 59-73. Ledley, D.R., E.A. Storch, M.E. Coles, R.G. Haimberg, J. Moser, and E.A. Bravata. 2006. The relationship between childhood teasing and late interpersonal functioning. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 28, no. 1: 33-40. Limber, S.P., M. Nation, A.J. Tracy, G.B. Melton, and V. Vlerx. 2004. Implementation of the Olweus bullying prevention program in the Southeastern United States. In Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be?, ed. P.K. Smith, D. Pepler, and K. Rigby., 55-79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lodge, J., and E. Frydenberg. 2005. The role of peer bystanders in school bullying: Positive steps toward promoting peaceful schools. Theory into Practice 44, no. 4: 329-336. Mahady-Wilton, M., W.M. Craig, and D.J. Pepler. 2000. Emotional regulation and display in classroom bullying: Characteristic expressions of affect, coping styles, and relevant contextual factors. Social Development, 2: 226-244. Olweus, D. 1991. Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In The development and treatment of childhood aggression, ed. D.Pepler and K. Rubin., 441-448. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Olweus, D. 1995. Bullying or peer abuse at school: Facts and intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science 4, no. 6: 196-200. Olweus, D. 2004. The Olweus bullying prevention programme: Design and implementation issues and a new national initiative in Norway. In Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be?, ed. P.K. Smith, D. Pepler, and K. Rigby., 13-36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. O�Moore, M., and C. Kirkham. (2001). Self-esteem and its relationship to bullying behaviour. Aggressive Behavior, 27: 269-283. Salmivalli, C., A. Huttunen, and K.M.J. Lagerspetz. 1997. Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38: 305-312. Salmivalli, C., J. Karhunen, and K.M.J. Lagerspetz. 1996. How do the victims respond to bullying? Aggressive Behavior, 22: 99-109. Salmivalli, C., K. Lagerspetz, K. Björkqvist, K. Österman, and A. Kaukiainen. 1996. Bullying as a group process: Participants roles and their relations to social status. Aggressive Behavior 22: 1-15. Salmivalli, C., and M. Voeten. 2004. Connections between attitudes, groups norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, no. 3: 246-258. Sapouna, M., D. Wolke, N. Vannini, S. Watson, S. Woods, W. Schneider, S. Enz, L. Hall, A. Paiva, E. Andre, K. Dautenhahn, and R. Aylett. In press. Virtual learning intervention to reduce bullying victimization in primary school: A controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, in press. Smith, P.K., K. Ananiadou, and H. Cowie. 2003. Interventions to reduce bullying. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48: 591-599. Smith, P.K., H. Cowie, R. F. Olafsson, and A.P.D. Liefooghe. 2002. Definitions in bullying: A comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a fourteen-country international comparison. Child Development, 73, no. 4: 1119-1133. Smith, P.K., S. Sharp, M. Eslea, and D. Thompson. 2004. England: The Sheffield Project. In Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be?, ed. P.K. Smith, D. Pepler, and K. Rigby., 99-124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Smith, P.K., and S. Shu. 2000. What good schools can do about bullying: Findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action. Childhood 7 no. 2: 193-212. Smith, P.K., L. Talamelli, H. Cowie, P. Naylor, and P. Chauhan. 2004. Profiles of nonvictims, escaped victims, continuing victims and new victims of school bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74: 565-581. Sutton, J., and P.K. Smith. 1999. Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participants role approach. Aggressive Behavior 25, 97-111. Vannini, N., S. Enz, M. Sapouna, D. Wolke, S. Watson, S.Woods, K. Dautenhahn, L. Hall, A. Paiva, E. André, R. Aylett8, and W. Schneider. (Submitted). �FearNot!� A computerbased Anti-bullying-program designed to foster peer Intervention�. van de Vijver, F.J.R. and R.K. Hambleton. 1996. Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, no. 2: 89-99. Watson, S., N. Vannini, M. Davis, S. Woods, M. Hall, L. Hall, and K. Dautenhahn. 2007. FearNot! an anti-bullying intervention: Evaluation of an interactive virtual learning environment. Paper presented at Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour (AISB), April 2-4. Newcastle, UK. Watson, S.E.J. , N. Vannini, S. Woods, K. Dautenhahn, M. Sapouna, S. Enz, W. Schneider, D. Wolke, L. Hall, A. Paiva, E. André, and R. Aylett. In Press. Construction of a bullying-specific Coping Strategy Knowledge questionnaire for use with primary school children. Technical Report, University of Hertfordshire. Whitney, I. and P.K. Smith. 1993. A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research 35, no. 1: 3-25. Wilkins-Shurmer, A., M.J. O�Callaghan, J.M. Najman, W. Bor, G.M. Williams, and M.J. Anderson. 2003. Association of bullying with adolescent health-related quality of life. Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health 39, no. 6: 436-441. Wolke, D., and M.M. Samara. 2004. Bullied by siblings: associations with peer victimisation and behaviour problems in Israeli lower secondary school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45, no. 5: 1015-1029. Wolke, D., S. Woods, L. Bloomfield, L. Karstadt. 2001a. Bullying involvement in primary schools and common health problems. Archives of Disease in Childhood 85: 197-201. Wolke, D., S. Woods, K. Stanford, and H. Schulz. 2001b. Bullying and victimization of primary and secondary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology 92, no. 4: 673-696. Woods, S., L. Hall, D. Sobral, K. Dautenhahn, and D. Wolke. 2003. Animated characters in bullying intervention. Paper presented at Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA), September 15-17, in Irsee, Germany.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3227